Ahmed Kamel Deraz

Dr. Ahmed Kamel Deraz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 July 2026 in Dentistry Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPier Edoardo Maltagliati
Pier Edoardo Maltagliati
Ahmed Kamel DerazAhmed Kamel Deraz
Ahmed Kamel Deraz
AMAlberto Maltagliati
Alberto Maltagliati
GMGiovanni Messina
Giovanni Messina
YIYashar Imenpour
Yashar Imenpour
SBStefano Benedicenti
Stefano Benedicenti
Background/Objectives: Single-retainer Maryland adhesive restorations provide a minimally invasive fixed option for replacing missing anterior teeth in young patients. When congenital absence of a maxillary lateral incisor is associated with a contralateral conoid lateral incisor, the clinical problem extends beyond tooth replacement to bilateral symmetry management. This case report describes a digital-restorative workflow combining a single-retainer lithium disilicate Maryland adhesive restoration with a pontic-derived stamp technique for contralateral symmetry correction. Methods: A medically healthy 13-year-old patient presented with congenital absence of the maxillary left lateral incisor (FDI 22; Universal 10) after orthodontic treatment and had been wearing a removable appliance to replace the single missing tooth. The contralateral maxillary right lateral incisor (FDI 12; Universal 7) presented with conoid morphology, further compromising anterior symmetry. Clinical assessment confirmed ideal mesiodistal space at FDI 22, a vital and unrestored FDI 21 with intact enamel and healthy periodontal support, and the absence of abnormal overjet, overbite, or excursive contact pattern. Based on the findings, a single-retainer Maryland adhesive restoration was fabricated from lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD) and bonded to the maxillary left central incisor (FDI 21; Universal 9) using an enamel-only preparation and adhesive cementation protocol. The fixed restoration was combined with a pontic-derived stamp workflow to guide direct composite reshaping of the contralateral conoid lateral incisor. Results: At 1-year follow-up, no debonding, sensitivity, marginal discoloration, or soft-tissue inflammation was observed. The contralateral composite reshaping remained clinically stable, and the patient and guardian reported improved comfort and esthetic satisfaction compared with the previous removable appliance. Conclusions: This case suggests the short-term clinical feasibility of combining a single-retainer lithium disilicate Maryland adhesive restoration with a pontic-derived stamp workflow to achieve minimally invasive tooth replacement and contralateral symmetry correction. Longer follow-up and broader case series are required to confirm the long-term predictability and reproducibility of this approach.