(1) Background: Poisonings in children are common reasons for addressing ED and can potentially have serious complications. Our research aims to review risk factors leading to poisoning in children. (2) Methods: A retrospective review of all pediatric poisoning cases addressing the Children’s emergency department of St Mary Hospital over a two-year period was performed. (3) Results: We collected data on 797 children admitted for acute poisoning. The highest incidence identified was in the 12–18 and 1–3-year-old age groups. The distribution of voluntary versus unintentional poisonings was relatively balanced: 50.19% versus 47.43% (for some cases the type of intoxication remained unknown). Exposure to the toxic substance by ingestion was significant compared to the other routes, with an incidence of 87.1%. Acute poisoning happened at home in 70.4% of cases. A known risk factor before reaching the ED was present in 13.04%. (4) Conclusions: Our study showed a greater risk for acute poisoning in children between 1–3 years of age, and adolescents over 12 years. Identifying and documenting epidemiological aspects and other variables is important for establishing preventive measures and for therapeutic conduct. Adequate risk stratification and preventive measures involving closer supervision of minors or cognitive-behavioral programs can prevent voluntary intoxication.

Background: Disasters, although predictable, often occur unexpectedly, and efforts must be directed towards reducing their impact. Emergency healthcare workers, key players in disaster response, should maintain a high level of preparedness to act in catastrophic situations. Data on knowledge, attitude, and disaster preparedness among emergency healthcare workers is scarce, particularly for developed countries in Europe. This study aimed to measure the perceived preparedness of various health practitioners in emergency care in Iași county (Romania) and identify factors that influence it. Materials and methods: A self-assessment web-based questionnaire was developed to measure knowledge (K), attitude (A), and preparedness (P). Nonparametric tests compared measurements between demographic groups. Spearman correlation, linear univariate, and multivariate regression models were used to test the effect of perceived knowledge, attitude, and other work-related factors (such as experience, training, and leadership) on disaster preparedness. Results: 211 valid entries were recorded (114 female and 97 male), of which 33.6% were doctors, 25.1% were nurses, and 23.7% were paramedics. There were differences in exposure to training across health professions for disasters and trauma management (p = 0.03 and p = 0.009). The sample’s overall scores for the three primary domains assessed were moderate. Univariate analyses identified a significant effect of knowledge and attitude on preparedness (B = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.79–1.01, p < 0.001, and B = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66–0.97, p < 0.001, respectively), which was maintained in multivariate regression. Workplace factors (disaster plans and institutional collaboration), along with experience in disaster management and emergency care, were determinants of preparedness, while the effect of training was insignificant. Conclusions: Most healthcare workers displayed moderate preparedness for disasters, while exposure to training and practice was found to be inadequate. Focus should be placed on identifying barriers and enhancing training delivery, strengthening institutional involvement in staff preparedness, and improving inter-professional collaborations. Adequate training methods must be developed and validated in further studies.