Alexander Metz

Dr. Alexander Metz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 August 2021 in Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAlexander Metz
Alexander Metz
JWJan Wollenhaupt
Jan Wollenhaupt
SGSteffen Glöckner
Steffen Glöckner
NMNiki Messini
Niki Messini
SHSimon Huber
Simon Huber
MWManfred S. Weiss
Manfred S. Weiss
In recent years, crystallographic fragment screening has matured into an almost routine experiment at several modern synchrotron sites. The hits of the screening experiment,i.e.small molecules or fragments binding to the target protein, are revealed along with their 3D structural information. Therefore, they can serve as useful starting points for further structure-based hit-to-lead development. However, the progression of fragment hits to tool compounds or even leads is often hampered by a lack of chemical feasibility. As an attractive alternative, compound analogs that embed the fragment hit structurally may be obtained from commercial catalogs. Here, a workflow is reported based on filtering and assessing such potential follow-up compounds by template docking. This means that the crystallographic binding pose was integrated into the docking calculations as a central starting parameter. Subsequently, the candidates are scored on their interactions within the binding pocket. In an initial proof-of-concept study using five starting fragments known to bind to the aspartic protease endothiapepsin, 28 follow-up compounds were selected using the designed workflow and their binding was assessed by crystallography. Ten of these compounds bound to the active site and five of them showed significantly increased affinity in isothermal titration calorimetry of up to single-digit micromolar affinity. Taken together, this strategy is capable of efficiently evolving the initial fragment hits without major synthesis efforts and with full control by X-ray crystallography.

12 September 2013 in Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAlexander Metz
Alexander Metz
JSJulia Schanda
Julia Schanda
MGManuel Grez
Manuel Grez
CWChristian Wichmann
Christian Wichmann
HGHolger Gohlke
Holger Gohlke

3 October 2025 in Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATAndreas Tosstorff
Andreas Tosstorff
MRMarkus G. Rudolph
Markus G. Rudolph
JBJörg Benz
Jörg Benz
BKBernd Kuhn
Bernd Kuhn
CKChristian Kramer
Christian Kramer
MGMichael K. Gilson
Michael K. Gilson

24 January 2019 in ChemMedChem
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJanis Marcus Müller
Janis Marcus Müller
RKRomina A. Kirschner
Romina A. Kirschner
JBJan‐Philipp Berndt
Jan‐Philipp Berndt
TWTobias Wulsdorf
Tobias Wulsdorf
AMAlexander Metz
Alexander Metz
GKGerhard Klebe
Gerhard Klebe

25 August 2024 in Crystals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FHFranziska U. Huschmann
Franziska U. Huschmann
JMJanis Marcus Müller
Janis Marcus Müller
AMAlexander Metz
Alexander Metz
MRMoritz Ruf
Moritz Ruf
JSJohanna Maria Senst
Johanna Maria Senst
GKGerhard Klebe
Gerhard Klebe
Fragment screening directly on protein crystals has been applied using AnalytiCon’s collection of intermediates that have been utilized to generate libraries of larger synthetic natural product-like molecules. The fragments with well-balanced physicochemical properties show an impressively high hit rate for a screen using the aspartic protease endothiapepsin. The subsequent validation and expansion of the discovered fragment hits benefits from AnalytiCon’s comprehensive library design. Since the screened fragments are intermediates that share a common core with larger and closely related analogs with modulated substitution patterns, they allow for the retrieval of off-the-shelf follow-up compounds, which enable the development of design strategies for fragment optimization. A promising bicyclic core scaffold found in several fragment hits could be validated by selecting a set of enlarged follow-up compounds. Due to unexpected changes in binding mode and no significant improvement in ligand efficiency, this series was quickly deemed unsuitable and therefore discontinued. The structures of follow-up compounds of two other fragments helped to evaluate a putative fusion of two overlapping fragment hits. A design concept on how to fuse the two fragments could be proposed and helps to plan a suitable substitution pattern and promising central bridging element.

1 April 2023 in Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KVKaren Vester
Karen Vester
AMAlexander Metz
Alexander Metz
SHSimon Huber
Simon Huber
Bernhard LollBernhard Loll
Bernhard Loll
MWMarkus C. Wahl
Markus C. Wahl
The conversion of hits to leads in drug discovery involves the elaboration of chemical core structures to increase their potency. In fragment-based drug discovery, low-molecular-weight compounds are tested for protein binding and are subsequently modified, with the tacit assumption that the binding mode of the original hit will be conserved among the derivatives. However, deviations from binding mode conservation are rather frequently observed, but potential causes of these alterations remain incompletely understood. Here, two crystal forms of the spliceosomal RNA helicase BRR2 were employed as a test case to explore the consequences of conformational changes in the target protein on the binding behaviour of fragment derivatives. The initial fragment, sulfaguanidine, bound at the interface between the two helicase cassettes of BRR2 in one crystal form. Second-generation compounds devised by structure-guided docking were probed for their binding to BRR2 in a second crystal form, in which the original fragment-binding site was altered due to a conformational change. While some of the second-generation compounds retained binding to parts of the original site, others changed to different binding pockets of the protein. A structural bioinformatics analysis revealed that the fragment-binding sites correspond to predicted binding hot spots, which strongly depend on the protein conformation. This case study offers an example of extensive binding-mode changes during hit derivatization, which are likely to occur as a consequence of multiple binding hot spots, some of which are sensitive to the flexibility of the protein.