For decades, cancer risk has been explained mainly by local factors. However, emerging evidence shows that the oral microbiome acts as a systemic modifier of oncogenesis well beyond the head and neck. This review synthesizes clinical and mechanistic data linking dysbiotic oral communities, especially Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Treponema denticola, to malignancies across gastrointestinal, respiratory, hepatobiliary, pancreatic, breast, and urogenital systems. We summarize organ-specific associations from saliva, tissue, and stool studies, noting the recurrent enrichment of oral taxa in tumor and peri-tumoral niches of oral, esophageal, gastric, colorectal, lung, pancreatic, liver, bladder, cervical, and breast cancers. Convergent mechanisms include the following: (i) persistent inflammation (lypopolysacharide, gingipains, cytolysins, and collagenases); (ii) direct genotoxicity (acetaldehyde, nitrosation, and CDT); (iii) immune evasion/suppression (TLR/NLR signaling, MDSC recruitment, TAN/TAM polarization, and TIGIT/CEACAM1 checkpoints); and (iv) epigenetic/signaling rewiring (NF-κB, MAPK/ERK, PI3K/AKT, JAK/STAT, WNT/β-catenin, Notch, COX-2, and CpG hypermethylation). Plausible dissemination along an oral–gut–systemic axis, hematogenous, lymphatic, microaspiration, and direct mucosal transfer enables distal effects. While causality is not yet definitive, cumulative data support oral dysbiosis as a clinically relevant cofactor, motivating biomarker-based risk stratification, saliva/stool assays for early detection, and microbiome-targeted interventions (periodontal care, antimicrobials, probiotics, and microbiota modulation) alongside conventional cancer control.

The subgingival biofilm, as the most complex microbial community, has been proven to be reservoir of Candida spp. The main concept of this study was to investigate if there is a difference between the sensitivity of Candida albicans (C. albicans) isolated from tongue and subgingival areas of periodontitis patients to antifungal agents. The aim of the study was to determine: (1) the distribution of different Candida species in the tongue and subgingival samples of periodontitis patients; (2) the susceptibility of Candida albicans strains from tongue and subgingival biofilm to the effects of commonly used antifungal agents: fluconazole, amphotericin B and itraconazole; (3) the correlation between the susceptibility of Candida albicans and clinical periodontal parameters. Tongue and subgingival biofilm samples of periodontitis subjects (N = 163) were examined. Susceptibility was tested when the same Candida species was isolated from both sites (17 subjects). Candida spp. were isolated in 23.3% of tongue and 21.5% of the subgingival samples. All isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B, while 64.71% of tongue and 52.94% of subgingival isolates were susceptible to fluconazole. A low frequency of itraconazole susceptibility was observed for tongue (17.64%) and subgingival isolates (11.76%). The correlations between full-mouth plaque score and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) for tongue isolates were strongly positive for all antimycotics. Positive correlation was also observed between moderate periodontal destruction and MICs for tongue and subgingival isolates. The susceptibility of C. albicans to antifungals correlate with oral hygiene and moderate periodontal destruction. There is no difference in antifungal susceptibility between tongue and subgingival isolates.

Background: Bladder neck preservation (BNP) has been adopted in open (ORP), laparoscopic (LRP), and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, there are concerns that this technique can compromise oncological outcome and increase positive surgical margins (PSM). The aim was to evaluate the outcome of BNP, focusing on surgical and pathological outcomes, as well as biochemical recurrence (BCR). Methods: We prospectively collected demographic and clinical data from 170 consecutive patients who underwent ORP and LRP between 2014 and 2020. ORP was performed in 63 patients, and the rest underwent LRP. BNP was performed in 85 patients. Results: PSM were found in 24.7% of patients. Of patients with BNP, 22.4% had PSM. There was no significant statistical difference between patients with or without BNP in the form of PSM. Base-positive margins were detected in 9.4% of patients with BNP and in 5.9% of patients without BNP with no statistical significance. Bioptic Gleason score, clinical stage, and preoperative PSA were statistically significantly correlated with PSM. BCR was more common in patients without BNP (23.5%) vs. non-BNP (21.2%). The only statistically significant predictor of BCR was PSM. Conclusion: This study suggests that BNP in RP is not associated with an increased level of PSM. Preoperative PSA, bioptic Gleason score, and clinical T stage of disease were identified as predictors of PSM occurrence.