The T790M resistance mutation is present in about one-half of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients at disease progression. We aimed to assess the prevalence of this mutation in a real-world setting and the clinical impact of repeated biopsies in its detection. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC diagnosed between 2016 and 2018, who experienced radiographic disease progression during first-line treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The frequency of T790M detection and the number of rebiopsies were determined. A total of 88 patients were included, with a median age of 65 years (range: 38-84 years). The majority of the participants were females (63 (72%)) and non-smokers (70 (81%)). Upon disease progression, 80 (91%) patients were tested for T790M mutation, and the resistance mutation was detected in 57 (71%) cases (58% in plasma samples and 42% in tissue/cytology samples). In 14 (25%) cases, T790M mutation was only detected after rebiopsy (57% by liquid biopsy), which increased the rate of mutation detection in 17%. Subsequent treatment with third-generation EGFR-TKI was possible in 42 (74%) of T790M-positive cases. Detection of T790M mutation was more likely in patients who were less than 65 years old, with EGFR exon 19 deletions and duration of first-line treatment of more than 12 months (p < 0.05). The frequency of T790M mutation in this study was higher than previously reported, suggesting that repeated biopsies after a negative result are beneficial. This allowed a greater percentage of patients to receive sequential osimertinib in our clinical practice.

Background: Social media platforms are increasingly being used by stakeholders to generate, access, and share health-related information and experiences. Lung cancer is the most common cancer, impacting > 2 million patients globally. This observational study utilized a social listening approach to analyze social media trends and gain insights into stakeholder perceptions of lung cancer. Methods: This social media study retrospectively collated data from open access blogs, forums, and social networking sites. Social media posts were collected between June 2019–May 2020 from 14 European countries. Using social media aggregator tools, posts comprising lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer-specific terms were extracted. Manual and automated relevancy algorithms filtered the extracted information to provide the relevant dataset. This contextualized dataset was further mined to generate the final data for analysis. Results: Of 1360 conversations analyzed, 42% were generated by patients/caregivers and 14% by healthcare professionals (HCPs). A majority of patients were 51–70 years old (approximately 50%) and 91% (n = 500/550) had late-stage cancer. Treatment (35%) and disease awareness (30%) were among the most discussed topic of the patient journey. Although the overall treatment sentiment was neutral, chemotherapy was the treatment type with the highest associated negative sentiment (28%); fewer negative sentiments were associated with immunotherapy (9%) and targeted therapy (2%), due to perceptions of longer survival outcomes and fewer side effects. In conversations that discussed clinical endpoints, “survivability” and “overall survival” (47 and 30%, respectively; n = 539) were most frequently mentioned by stakeholders. HCPs mostly used technical terms, whereas patients and caregivers used colloquial terms such as “getting rid of cancer”. Emotional wellness was identified to have a huge impact on quality of life in lung cancer. Delay or treatment cancellations due to COVID-19, lack of effective treatments and funding, and lack of empathy by physicians emerged as the key unmet needs among patients/caregivers. Conclusions: Social listening proved to be an effective tool to explore stakeholders’ perceptions and their key unmet needs, typically not available in published literature or databases, and provides HCPs with valuable insights into the distress, doubts, and needs of lung cancer patients and caregivers.

Lung cancer (LC) cells frequently express high levels of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Although these levels grossly correlate with the likelihood of response to specific checkpoint inhibitors, the response prediction is rather imperfect, and more accurate predictive biomarkers are mandatory. We examined the methylation profile of RAD51B (RAD51B^me) as a candidate predictive biomarker for anti-PD-1 therapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), correlating with patients’ outcome. PD-L1 immunoexpression and RAD51B^me levels were analysed in NSCLC samples obtained from patients not treated with anti-PD-1 (Untreated Cohort (#1)) and patients treated with PD-1 blockade (Treated Cohort (#2)). Of a total of 127 patients assessed, 58.3% depicted PD-L1 positivity (PD-L1⁺). RAD51B^me levels were significantly associated with PD-L1 immunoexpression. Patients with PD-1 blockade clinical benefit disclosed higher RAD51B^me levels (p = 0.0390) and significantly lower risk of disease progression (HR 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15–0.88; p = 0.025). Combining RAD51B^me+ with PD-L1⁺ improved the sensitivity of the test to predict immunotherapy response. PD-L1⁺ was also associated with lower risk of death (HR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.15–0.81; p = 0.014). Thus, RAD51B^me levels might be combined with validated predictive biomarker PD-L1 immunostaining to select patients who will most likely experience clinical benefit from PD-1 blockade. The predictive value of RAD51B^me should be confirmed in prospective studies.

Lung carcinoids are rare tumors representing 1–2% of all invasive lung malignancies. They include typical and atypical carcinoids, whose distinction is made based on the mitotic index and presence or absence of necrosis. The 10-year overall survival for stage IV typical carcinoid is 47% and 18% for atypical carcinoid, reflecting the indolent growth of these tumors. There are limited approved treatment options for them and most of the evidence comes from retrospective analyses, single-arm trials, subgroup analysis of phase II/III trials for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and extrapolation of data from phase III trials for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Management of metastatic lung carcinoids requires a multidisciplinary standardized approach in specialized centers. Treatment should have a dual objective, control of tumor growth and control of symptoms related to hypersecretion syndromes, aiming to improve quality of life and survival. In the continuum of treatment disease, locoregional treatment options need to be considered in parallel with systemic treatments. In this paper, we review the present treatment options and their rational and we give an insight into future alternatives.

Single-agent oral vinorelbine is a standard of care for hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) that has progressed on endocrine therapy. Metronomic administration may offer a better balance of efficacy and safety than standard regimens, but data from previous trials are scarce. In this open-label, multicenter, phase II trial, patients were randomized to oral vinorelbine administered on a metronomic (50 mg three times weekly) or weekly (60 mg/m² in cycle 1, increasing to 80 mg/m² if well tolerated) schedule. Treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerance. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR, the proportion of patients with a best overall confirmed response of CR, PR, or stable disease lasting 6 months or more). One-hundred sixty-three patients were randomized and treated. The DCR was 63.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.0-73.8) with metronomic vinorelbine and 72.8% (95% CI: 61.8-82.1) with weekly vinorelbine. Weekly vinorelbine was also associated with longer progression-free survival (5.6 vs 4.0 months) and overall survival (26.7 vs 22.3 months) than metronomic vinorelbine, but was associated with more adverse events. In this randomized phase II trial, single-agent metronomic oral vinorelbine was effective and well tolerated as first-line chemotherapy for patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative ABC. Formal comparisons are not done in this phase II study and one can simply observe that confidence intervals of all endpoints overlap. When deciding for a chemotherapy after failure of endocrine therapy and CDK 4/6 inhibitors, oral vinorelbine might be an option to be given with either schedule. EudraCT 2014-003860-19.

Synchronous pleural mesothelioma (PM) and breast cancer are extremely rare. We present the case of a 53-year-old female diagnosed with localized breast cancer. She was radically treated with surgery, but during the adjuvant radiotherapy, the patient developed fever and dyspnoea, and pleural thickening was found on a CT scan. The biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of a synchronous malignancy - pleural epithelioid mesothelioma. The patient stopped radiotherapy and started adjuvant endocrine therapy with exemestane, a third-generation aromatase inhibitor, with an unexpected partial response to the PM. The patient remains on exemestane with a sustained partial response. This is a rare case of synchronous tumours that show a real-life benefit of exemestane in the treatment of pleural mesothelioma, which was only described in vitro, with a good sustained response. This suggests a potential for exemestane in the treatment of mesothelioma, which is an aggressive form of cancer with few therapeutics with sustained results.