Enrico Anderlini

Dr. Enrico Anderlini

University College London
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2017 in International Journal of Marine Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Enrico AnderliniEnrico Anderlini
Enrico Anderlini
DFD.I.M. Forehand
D.I.M. Forehand
EBE. Bannon
E. Bannon
MAM. Abusara
M. Abusara

1 June 2016 in IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Enrico AnderliniEnrico Anderlini
Enrico Anderlini
DFDavid I. M. Forehand
David I. M. Forehand
PSPaul Stansell
Paul Stansell
QXQing Xiao
Qing Xiao
MAMohammad Abusara
Mohammad Abusara
This work presents the application of reinforcement learning for the optimal resistive control of a point absorber. The model-free Q-learning algorithm is selected in order to maximise energy absorption in each sea state. Step changes are made to the controller damping, observing the associated penalty, for excessive motions, or reward, i.e. gain in associated power. Due to the general periodicity of gravity waves, the absorbed power is averaged over a time horizon lasting several wave periods. The performance of the algorithm is assessed through the numerical simulation of a point absorber subject to motions in heave in both regular and irregular waves. The algorithm is found to converge towards the optimal controller damping in each sea state. Additionally, the model-free approach ensures the algorithm can adapt to changes to the device hydrodynamics over time and is unbiased by modelling errors.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Enrico AnderliniEnrico Anderlini
Enrico Anderlini
SHSalman Husain
Salman Husain
GPGordon Parker
Gordon Parker
Mohammad AbusaraMohammad Abusara
Mohammad Abusara
GTGiles Thomas
Giles Thomas
The levellised cost of energy of wave energy converters (WECs) is not competitive with fossil fuel-powered stations yet. To improve the feasibility of wave energy, it is necessary to develop effective control strategies that maximise energy absorption in mild sea states, whilst limiting motions in high waves. Due to their model-based nature, state-of-the-art control schemes struggle to deal with model uncertainties, adapt to changes in the system dynamics with time, and provide real-time centralised control for large arrays of WECs. Here, an alternative solution is introduced to address these challenges, applying deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to the control of WECs for the first time. A DRL agent is initialised from data collected in multiple sea states under linear model predictive control in a linear simulation environment. The agent outperforms model predictive control for high wave heights and periods, but suffers close to the resonant period of the WEC. The computational cost at deployment time of DRL is also much lower by diverting the computational effort from deployment time to training. This provides confidence in the application of DRL to large arrays of WECs, enabling economies of scale. Additionally, model-free reinforcement learning can autonomously adapt to changes in the system dynamics, enabling fault-tolerant control.

21 August 2019 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Enrico AnderliniEnrico Anderlini
Enrico Anderlini
GPGordon Parker
Gordon Parker
GTGiles Thomas
Giles Thomas
To achieve persistent systems in the future, autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) will need to autonomously dock onto a charging station. Here, reinforcement learning strategies were applied for the first time to control the docking of an AUV onto a fixed platform in a simulation environment. Two reinforcement learning schemes were investigated: one with continuous state and action spaces, deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG), and one with continuous state but discrete action spaces, deep Q network (DQN). For DQN, the discrete actions were selected as step changes in the control input signals. The performance of the reinforcement learning strategies was compared with classical and optimal control techniques. The control actions selected by DDPG suffer from chattering effects due to a hyperbolic tangent layer in the actor. Conversely, DQN presents the best compromise between short docking time and low control effort, whilst meeting the docking requirements. Whereas the reinforcement learning algorithms present a very high computational cost at training time, they are five orders of magnitude faster than optimal control at deployment time, thus enabling an on-line implementation. Therefore, reinforcement learning achieves a performance similar to optimal control at a much lower computational cost at deployment, whilst also presenting a more general framework.

1 November 2021 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PWPeng Wu
Peng Wu
JPJulius Partridge
Julius Partridge
Enrico AnderliniEnrico Anderlini
Enrico Anderlini
YLYuanchang Liu
Yuanchang Liu
RBRichard Bucknall
Richard Bucknall

1 August 2021 in Ocean Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAnastasia Laurie
Anastasia Laurie
Enrico AnderliniEnrico Anderlini
Enrico Anderlini
JDJesper Dietz
Jesper Dietz
GTGiles Thomas
Giles Thomas