Purpose: This study explores global frameworks for healthcare data privacy, focusing on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), and the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA). It examines the challenges of regional regulatory disparities, systemic vulnerabilities identified through major health data breach case studies, and the potential of advanced technologies to enhance privacy protections. Methods: A qualitative research approach was adopted, incorporating corpus construction and comparative analysis of legal and technical frameworks. The study also utilized case studies of significant health data breaches to identify vulnerabilities and evaluate the role of emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), in mitigating risks and enhancing regulatory compliance. Results: Findings indicate that GDPR, CCPA, and POPIA set high standards for data protection but reveal significant variability in enforcement and technological adoption across regions. Challenges include inconsistent definitions of sensitive data, semantic discrepancies, a lack of standardized protocols, and limited information technology infrastructure in certain jurisdictions. Advanced technologies like AI and ML promise to address these gaps by improving data harmonization and security. Conclusions: Addressing healthcare data privacy challenges requires harmonized global regulations, advanced technological tools, and international collaboration. Strengthening frameworks, enhancing information technology infrastructure, and employing semantic models and ontologies are essential for protecting sensitive data, ensuring compliance, and fostering public trust in digital healthcare systems.

Background: Chronic diseases such as cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes and coronary heart disease profoundly affect individuals’ quality of life, requiring sustained adaptive coping mechanisms to manage physical, emotional and social challenges. This review contributes to the public health literature by systematically synthesising coping strategies used by individuals living with these conditions. Objectives: To identify, categorise and compare coping strategies employed by individuals with cancer, COPD, diabetes and coronary heart disease, and to examine the personal, familial and systemic factors shaping these adaptive responses. Methods: A systematic review of peer‐reviewed studies published in English between January 2010 and September 2024 was conducted across five major databases that include PubMed, CINAHL Complete, JSTOR, PsycINFO and ScienceDirect using a structured search strategy with Boolean operators and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH terms). Thematic analysis was employed to synthesise findings from the selected studies. Results: Eight core themes emerged: maladaptive stress strategies, maintaining ‘normalcy’, medication use, emotional factors, expanding social networks, therapeutic interventions, complementary therapies and the influence of religion, music and nature. These themes illustrate the multidimensional nature of coping with chronic illness. Problem‐focused coping (e.g., self‐management and goal setting), emotion‐focused coping (e.g., mindfulness and emotional support) and avoidance coping (e.g., denial and disengagement) were all prevalent. Social determinants such as healthcare access, family relationships and community support significantly influenced outcomes, with stronger social support linked to greater resilience and better adherence to treatment. Conclusion: Effective coping strategies for chronic disease management require a holistic approach that addresses both individual mechanisms and broader social and systemic influences. Interventions should improve healthcare accessibility, strengthen family and community networks and offer tailored psychological resources to foster resilience.

Summary: This study examined the moderating influences of active social networks (ASN), sedentary social networks (SSN) and ASN lost on the relationship between neighbourhood walkability and social activity in community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or more in Accra, Ghana. A total of 863 individuals participated after G*Power 3.1 was utilized to calculate the minimum sample size. We analysed the data with Pearson’s correlation test and hierarchical linear regression models. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to select the ultimate confounding variables. The study found a positive influence of neighbourhood walkability on social activity after the covariate adjustment (β = 0.18; t = 5.2; p = 0.000). The positive influence of neighbourhood walkability on social activity was significantly reduced by ASN lost and SSN. ASN did not have a significant moderating influence on the primary relationship. The study concludes that the positive influence of walkable neighbourhoods on social activity decreases as SSN and ASN lost increase.

Background: The concept of resilience runs through an array of disciplines, consisting of engineering, public health, ecology, psychology, sociology, disaster management, and business administration. Researchers have tries to explain the relationship amongst connected ideas such as resiliency, adaptability, transformability, and vulnerability but their varied definitions and differences between them remain fuzzy. There are two reasons why resilience theory is important in entrepreneurship. Firstly, researchers generally employ the term resilience to mean consciousness, determination, perseverance, or self-value to justify why some entrepreneurs and their firms achieve better results than their non-resilient counterparts. Secondly, there are cognitive and behavioral entrepreneurial traits that strengthen a firm’s capability to adapt to varying conditions. The aim of this study is to review the literature that intercepts resilience and entrepreneurship. The study will attempt to identify scholarly conversations to construct notions of resilience and entrepreneurship. Therefore, limitations in the current literature will be examined and directions for future studies would be highlighted. Methods: This paper adopted a systematic interdisciplinary review of relevant studies that is patterned using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Results: The scholarly works selected from the literature portrayed six emerging colloquies or research tributaries that intercept entrepreneurship and resilience: Resilience as a function of entrepreneurial individuals or firms, Resilience generating entrepreneurial intentions, Entrepreneurial behavior boosting organizational resilience and, Resilience in the framework of entrepreneurial failure, Entrepreneurship and culture, Resilience as a process of recovery and transformation. Conclusions: This study serves as a backdrop for the emergence of more nuanced debates on the relationship that exists between different streams of conversations on resilience. In addition, this paper shows how entrepreneurs contribute towards promoting a constructively sustainable means for socio-economic development.

Generally, men in sub-Saharan Africa make reproductive decisions that affect their partners. We examined the predictors of fertility desires among married men across three age cohorts: 20–35 years, 36–50 year, and 51–59 years. Using the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey dataset, we conducted ANOVA and multivariate binary logistic regressions on 1431 monogamous married men aged 20–59 years. Two indicators of fertility desire are constructed: (i) the comparison of men’s ideal versus women’s ideal family size, and (ii) the desire for more children. The results indicate that the fertility desire of men is stronger than that of women. The predictors of fertility desire are age, parity, religion, contraceptive use, wealth quintile, couples’ age difference and couples’ difference in education. At ages 20–35 years, men using modern contraceptives were more likely to desire more children compared with those not using any modern contraceptives. However, at ages 36–50 years, men using modern contraceptives were less likely to desire more children. This finding suggests that men change their fertility desires in response to changes in their ages.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed and intensified structural inequities at the nexus of ageing, migration, and socioeconomic vulnerability. These overlapping disadvantages resulted in uneven health outcomes and highlighted systemic fragilities in health systems; yet, few policy reviews have integrated these demographic dimensions into a single analytical framework. Objectives: This review critically examines how ageing, migration, and socioeconomic disparities intersect to shape health equity during and after the pandemic. It identifies structural bottlenecks, adaptive responses, and lessons for policy design in low- and middle-income as well as high-income contexts. Methods: A systematic policy review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and preregistered on the Open Science Framework. Peer-reviewed studies, institutional reports, and grey literature published between 2020 and 2024 were appraised using differentiated quality criteria. Thematic convergence, guided by the Social Determinants of Health, Human Capital Theory, and Feminist Gerontology, informed narrative synthesis across 49 included sources. Results: A total of four intersecting themes emerged: (1) demographic inequality and uneven risk exposure; (2) exclusionary health systems and digital divides; (3) socioeconomic precarity and erosion of human capital; and (4) fragmented policy responses with limited ageing- and migrant-sensitivity. Comparative evidence underscores persistent inequities across regions, with gaps most pronounced in the Global South. Conclusion: Post-pandemic health equity demands integrated and anticipatory governance. Strengthened geriatric and migrant-inclusive health systems, expanded universal social protection, investment in digital and community infrastructure, and institutionalised intersectional policy design are essential to break cycles of cumulative disadvantage and advance health justice. This review uniquely integrates ageing, migration, and socioeconomic inequities into a unified framework across regions, offering theory-informed policy clusters to guide future governance. Protocol registration: The review protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) under the DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6YHC4 .