Andrew Stuart Davison

Dr. Andrew Stuart Davison

Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2020 in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLakshminarayana R Ranganath
Lakshminarayana R Ranganath
EPEftychia Eirini Psarelli
Eftychia Eirini Psarelli
JAJean-Baptiste Arnoux
Jean-Baptiste Arnoux
DBDaniela Braconi
Daniela Braconi
MBMichael Briggs
Michael Briggs
JGJames A Gallagher
James A Gallagher

20 December 2021 in Metabolomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IRIvayla Roberts
Ivayla Roberts
MMMarina Wright Muelas
Marina Wright Muelas
JTJoseph M. Taylor
Joseph M. Taylor
Andrew Stuart DavisonAndrew Stuart Davison
Andrew Stuart Davison
YXYun Xu
Yun Xu
DKDouglas Kell
Douglas Kell
Introduction: The diagnosis of COVID-19 is normally based on the qualitative detection of viral nucleic acid sequences. Properties of the host response are not measured but are key in determining outcome. Although metabolic profiles are well suited to capture host state, most metabolomics studies are either underpowered, measure only a restricted subset of metabolites, compare infected individuals against uninfected control cohorts that are not suitably matched, or do not provide a compact predictive model. Objectives: Here we provide a well-powered, untargeted metabolomics assessment of 120 COVID-19 patient samples acquired at hospital admission. The study aims to predict the patient’s infection severity (i.e., mild or severe) and potential outcome (i.e., discharged or deceased). Methods: High resolution untargeted UHPLC-MS/MS analysis was performed on patient serum using both positive and negative ionization modes. A subset of 20 intermediary metabolites predictive of severity or outcome were selected based on univariate statistical significance and a multiple predictor Bayesian logistic regression model was created. Results: The predictors were selected for their relevant biological function and include deoxycytidine and ureidopropionate (indirectly reflecting viral load), kynurenine (reflecting host inflammatory response), and multiple short chain acylcarnitines (energy metabolism) among others. Currently, this approach predicts outcome and severity with a Monte Carlo cross validated area under the ROC curve of 0.792 (SD 0.09) and 0.793 (SD 0.08), respectively. A blind validation study on an additional 90 patients predicted outcome and severity at ROC AUC of 0.83 (CI 0.74–0.91) and 0.76 (CI 0.67–0.86). Conclusion: Prognostic tests based on the markers discussed in this paper could allow improvement in the planning of COVID-19 patient treatment.

1 September 2018 in Molecular Genetics and Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLakshminarayana R Ranganath
Lakshminarayana R Ranganath
MKM. Khedr
M. Khedr
AMAnna Milan
Anna Milan
Andrew Stuart DavisonAndrew Stuart Davison
Andrew Stuart Davison
AHA.T. Hughes
A.T. Hughes
JGJ.A. Gallagher
J.A. Gallagher

1 March 2007 in Bone
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBM. Baines
M. Baines
MKM.-B. Kredan
M.-B. Kredan
JUJ. Usher
J. Usher
Andrew Stuart DavisonAndrew Stuart Davison
Andrew Stuart Davison
GHG. Higgins
G. Higgins
LRL.R. Ranganath
L.R. Ranganath

1 July 2014 in Journal of Chromatography B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHA.T. Hughes
A.T. Hughes
AMAnna Milan
Anna Milan
PCP. Christensen
P. Christensen
GRG. Ross
G. Ross
Andrew Stuart DavisonAndrew Stuart Davison
Andrew Stuart Davison
LRL.R. Ranganath
L.R. Ranganath

1 April 1986 in Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
INIoannis Nikas
Ioannis Nikas
JMJohn McLauchlan
John McLauchlan
Andrew Stuart DavisonAndrew Stuart Davison
Andrew Stuart Davison
WTWilliam R. Taylor
William R. Taylor
JCJ. Barklie Clements
J. Barklie Clements