Anna Kipp

Dr. Anna Kipp

Friedrich Schiller University Jena
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2015 in Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Anna KippAnna Kipp
Anna Kipp
DSD. Strohm
D. Strohm
RBR. Brigelius-Flohé
R. Brigelius-Flohé
Lutz SchomburgLutz Schomburg
Lutz Schomburg
ABA. Bechthold
A. Bechthold
HHH. Heseker
H. Heseker
The German, Austrian and Swiss nutrition societies are the joint editors of the 'reference values for nutrient intake'. They have revised the reference values for the intake of selenium and published them in February 2015. The saturation of selenoprotein P (SePP) in plasma is used as a criterion for the derivation of reference values for selenium intake in adults. For persons from selenium-deficient regions (China) SePP saturation was achieved with a daily intake of 49μg of selenium. When using the reference body weights the D-A-CH reference values are based upon, the resulting estimated value for selenium intake is 70μg/day for men and 60μg/day for women. The estimated value for selenium intake for children and adolescents is extrapolated using the estimated value for adults in relation to body weight. For infants aged 0 to under 4 months the estimated value of 10μg/day was derived from the basis of selenium intake via breast milk. For infants aged 4 to under 12 months this estimated value was used and taking into account the differences regarding body weight an estimated value of 15μg/day was derived. For lactating women compared to non-lactating women a higher reference value of 75μg/day is indicated due to the release of selenium with breast milk. The additional selenium requirement for pregnant women is negligible, so that no increased reference value is indicated.

1 November 2009 in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRegina Brigelius-Flohe
Regina Brigelius-Flohe
Anna KippAnna Kipp
Anna Kipp

28 July 2016 in Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KWKarolin Weitkunat
Karolin Weitkunat
SSSara Schumann
Sara Schumann
DNDaniela Nickel
Daniela Nickel
KKKatharina Antonia Kappo
Katharina Antonia Kappo
KPKlaus Jürgen Petzke
Klaus Jürgen Petzke
Susanne KlausSusanne Klaus
Susanne Klaus
Scope The SCFA acetate (Ac) and propionate (Pr) are major fermentation products of dietary fibers and provide additional energy to the host. We investigated short- and long-term effects of dietary Ac and Pr supplementation on diet-induced obesity and hepatic lipid metabolism. Methods and results C3H/HeOuJ mice received high-fat (HF) diets supplemented with 5% SCFA in different Ac:Pr ratios, a high acetate (HF-HAc; 2.5:1 Ac:Pr) or high Pr ratio (HF-HPr; 1:2.5 Ac:Pr) for 6 or 22 weeks. Control diets (low-fat (LF), HF) contained no SCFA. SCFA did not affect body composition but reduced hepatic gene and protein expression of lipogenic enzymes leading to a reduced hepatic triglyceride concentration after 22 weeks in HF-HPr mice. Analysis of long-chain fatty acid composition (liver and plasma phospholipids) showed that supplementation of both ratios led to a lower ω6:ω3 ratio. Pr directly led to increased odd-chain fatty acid (C15:0, C17:0) formation as confirmed in vitro using HepG2 cells. Remarkably, plasma C15:0 was correlated with the attenuation of HF diet-induced insulin resistance. Conclusion Dependent on the Ac:Pr ratio, especially odd-chain fatty acid formation and insulin sensitivity are differentially affected, indicating the importance of Pr.

1 December 2010 in Free Radical Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFSimone Florian
Simone Florian
SKSusanne Krehl
Susanne Krehl
MLMaria Loewinger
Maria Loewinger
Anna KippAnna Kipp
Anna Kipp
ABAntje Banning
Antje Banning
RBRegina Brigelius-Flohe
Regina Brigelius-Flohe

17 December 2011 in Carcinogenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKSusanne Krehl
Susanne Krehl
MLMaria Loewinger
Maria Loewinger
SFSimone Florian
Simone Florian
Anna KippAnna Kipp
Anna Kipp
ABAntje Banning
Antje Banning
RBRegina Brigelius-Flohe
Regina Brigelius-Flohe
Chronic inflammation and selenium deficiency are considered as risk factors for colon cancer. The protective effect of selenium might be mediated by specific selenoproteins, such as glutathione peroxidases (GPx). GPx-1 and -2 double knockout, but not single knockout mice, spontaneously develop ileocolitis and intestinal cancer. Since GPx2 is induced by the chemopreventive sulforaphane (SFN) via the nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/Keap1 system, the susceptibility of GPx2-KO and wild-type (WT) mice to azoxymethane and dextran sulfate sodium (AOM/DSS)-induced colon carcinogenesis was tested under different selenium states and SFN applications. WT and GPx2-KO mice were grown on a selenium-poor, -adequate or -supranutritional diet. SFN application started either 1 week before (SFN4) or along with (SFN3) a single AOM application followed by DSS treatment for 1 week. Mice were assessed 3 weeks after AOM for colitis and Nrf2 target gene expression and after 12 weeks for tumorigenesis. NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductases, thioredoxin reductases and glutathione-S-transferases were upregulated in the ileum and/or colon by SFN, as was GPx2 in WT mice. Inflammation scores were more severe in GPx2-KO mice and highest in selenium-poor groups. Inflammation was enhanced by SFN4 in both genotypes under selenium restriction but decreased in selenium adequacy. Total tumor numbers were higher in GPx2-KO mice but diminished by increasing selenium in both genotypes. SFN3 reduced inflammation and tumor multiplicity in both Se-adequate genotypes. Tumor size was smaller in Se-poor GPx2-KO mice. It is concluded that GPx2, although supporting tumor growth, inhibits inflammation-mediated tumorigenesis, but the protective effect of selenium does not strictly depend on GPx2 expression. Similarly, SFN requires selenium but not GPx2 for being protective.

3 August 2017 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MWMelanie Wiesner-Reinhold
Melanie Wiesner-Reinhold
MSMonika Schreiner
Monika Schreiner
SBSusanne Baldermann
Susanne Baldermann
DSDietmar Schwarz
Dietmar Schwarz
Franziska HanschenFranziska Hanschen
Franziska Hanschen
MMMarian J. McKenzie
Marian J. McKenzie
Selenium (Se) is an essential micronutrient for human health. Se deficiency affects hundreds of millions of people worldwide, particularly in developing countries, and there is increasing awareness that suboptimal supply of selenium can also negatively affect human health. Selenium enters the diet primarily through the ingestion of plant and animal products. Although plants are not dependent on Se they take it up from the soil through the sulfur (S) uptake and assimilation pathways. Therefore, geographic differences in the availability of soil Se and agricultural practices have a profound influence on the Se content of many foods, and there are increasing efforts to biofortify crop plants with Se. Plants from the Brassicales are of particular interest as they accumulate and synthesize Se into forms with additional health benefits, such as methylselenocysteine (MeSeCys). The Brassicaceae are also well known to produce the glucosinolates; S-containing compounds with demonstrated human health value. Furthermore, the recent discovery of the selenoglucosinolates in the Brassicaceae raises questions regarding their potential bioefficacy. In this review we focus on Se uptake and metabolism in the Brassicaceae in the context of human health, particularly cancer prevention and immunity. We investigate the close relationship between Se and S metabolism in this plant family, with particular emphasis on the selenoglucosinolates, and consider the methodologies available for identifying and quantifying further novel Se-containing compounds in plants. Finally, we summarise the research of multiple groups investigating biofortification of the Brassicaeae and discuss which approaches might be most successful for supplying Se deficient populations in the future.