Marcela Arenas-González

Prof. Dr. Marcela Arenas-González

Estomatología, Universidad de SEvilla, Seville, Spain
orcid
D.D.S., PH.D., M.Sc Adjunct Professor, Faculty of Dentistry,...

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 March 2006 in Dental Traumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Marcela Arenas-GonzálezMarcela Arenas-González
Marcela Arenas-González
EBElena Barbería
Elena Barbería
TLTania Lucavechi
Tania Lucavechi
MMMyriam Maroto
Myriam Maroto

1 May 2008 in The Journal of the American Dental Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBElena Barbería
Elena Barbería
MMMyriam Maroto
Myriam Maroto
Marcela Arenas-GonzálezMarcela Arenas-González
Marcela Arenas-González
CSCristina Cardoso Silva
Cristina Cardoso Silva

3 May 2025 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAdriana Dayaneira Fernández-Cevallos
Adriana Dayaneira Fernández-Cevallos
DPDAVID Ribas Pérez
DAVID Ribas Pérez
Marcela Arenas-GonzálezMarcela Arenas-González
Marcela Arenas-González
LELuis Elkhoury-Moreno
Luis Elkhoury-Moreno
JTJulio Torrejón-Martínez
Julio Torrejón-Martínez
ACAntonio Luis Castaño-Seiquer
Antonio Luis Castaño-Seiquer
Self-esteem is a stable characteristic that is usually maintained from adolescence to adulthood. People with high self-esteem are mentally prepared to face different challenges in their lives with great confidence. Assess the influence of dental aesthetics on self-esteem in students at the Polígono Sur Education Permanent Center. A cross-sectional descriptive study with qualitative and quantitative variables in which 92 participants from the permanent education center located in the polígono sur of the city of Seville. To identify if there was a relationship between self-perception of dental aesthetics and self-esteem, two surveys were conducted in the educational center, one of them to determine a high or low psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale, which evaluated the level of acceptance and respect that participants had for themselves. Demographic variables analyzed were gender, age, nationality, and occupation. To analyze categorical variables, contingency tables and the Pearson Chi-square test were used. Students did not have a low self-esteem in relation to a high psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics p > 0, 05 (0.069), but a high self-esteem indifferent to whether they had a high or low psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics. However, there were exceptions according to gender (p = 0.019) or nationality (p = 0.030). Self-esteem was not greatly affected by the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in the majority of students evaluated, but it was possible to state that there was a negative impact in the male gender and also by nationality.

3 March 2006 in Dental Traumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMyriam Maroto
Myriam Maroto
EBElena Barbería
Elena Barbería
Marcela Arenas-GonzálezMarcela Arenas-González
Marcela Arenas-González
TLTania Lucavechi
Tania Lucavechi

1 March 2007
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBE Barberia
E Barberia
Marcela Arenas-GonzálezMarcela Arenas-González
Marcela Arenas-González
BGB Gómez
B Gómez
DSD Saavedra-Ontiveros
D Saavedra-Ontiveros

5 August 2025 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMARIA BIEDMA PEREA
MARIA BIEDMA PEREA
MMMaría Moscoso-Sánchez
María Moscoso-Sánchez
MSMaría José Barra Soto
María José Barra Soto
Marcela Arenas-GonzálezMarcela Arenas-González
Marcela Arenas-González
DPDAVID Ribas Pérez
DAVID Ribas Pérez
CCCarolina Caleza-Jiménez
Carolina Caleza-Jiménez
Objective: Due to the increasing esthetic demand among pediatric patients and different restorative materials, we focused on analyzing which of the options of restorations may provide superior clinical outcomes. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) using PubMed and Cochrane databases. Results: Five articles met all inclusion criteria from an initial pool of 359 articles identified in the initial search. Greater bond strength was observed when pulpotomized teeth were restored with Biodentine® and resin composites compared to resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs). When comparing pulpotomies in primary teeth with MTA and Biodentine®, the fracture resistance values were higher in the pulpotomized teeth with Biodentine® than with MTA. Additionally, following a narrative synthesis in MTA-treated teeth, a higher risk of failure was observed using RMGICs or composite instead of stainless-steel crowns (SCCs) as the final restorative material. Conclusions: Variables such as the type of final restoration can affect the survival of primary teeth after pulpotomy reconstruction. Regardless of the pulp material, survival with SSCs is higher, but resin composites appear to be a viable restorative material after Biodentine® application.