Benoit Vozel

Dr. Benoit Vozel

University of Rennes 1, France
+2
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Signal Processing: Image Communication
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NPNikolay Ponomarenko
Nikolay Ponomarenko
LJLina Jin
Lina Jin
OIOleg Ieremeiev
Oleg Ieremeiev
Vladimir LukinVladimir Lukin
Vladimir Lukin
KEKaren Egiazarian
Karen Egiazarian
CKC.-C. Jay Kuo
C.-C. Jay Kuo
International audienceThis paper describes a recently created image database, TID2013, intended for evaluation of full-reference visual quality assessment metrics. With respect to TID2008, the new database contains a larger number (3000) of test images obtained from 25 reference images, 24 types of distortions for each reference image, and 5 levels for each type of distortion. Motivations for introducing 7 new types of distortions and one additional level of distortions are given; examples of distorted images are presented. Mean opinion scores (MOS) for the new database have been collected by performing 985 subjective experiments with volunteers (observers) from five countries (Finland, France, Italy, Ukraine, and USA). The availability of MOS allows the use of the designed database as a fundamental tool for assessing the effectiveness of visual quality. Furthermore, existing visual quality metrics have been tested with the proposed database and the collected results have been analyzed using rank order correlation coefficients between MOS and considered metrics. These correlation indices have been obtained both considering the full set of distorted images and specific image subsets, for highlighting advantages and drawbacks of existing, state of the art, quality metrics. Approaches to thorough performance analysis for a given metric are presented to detect practical situations or distortion types for which this metric is not adequate enough to human perception. The created image database and the collected MOS values are freely available for downloading and utilization for scientific purposes

1 January 2013
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
NPNikolay Ponomarenko
Nikolay Ponomarenko
OIOleg Ieremeiev
Oleg Ieremeiev
Vladimir LukinVladimir Lukin
Vladimir Lukin
LJLina Jin
Lina Jin
KEKaren Egiazarian
Karen Egiazarian
CKC. -C. Jay Kuo
C. -C. Jay Kuo

22 February 2011 in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MUMikhail L. Uss
Mikhail L. Uss
Benoit VozelBenoit Vozel
Benoit Vozel
Vladimir LukinVladimir Lukin
Vladimir Lukin
Kacem CHEHDIKacem CHEHDI
Kacem CHEHDI
A maximum-likelihood method for estimating hyperspectral sensors random noise components, both dependent and independent from the signal, is proposed. A hyperspectral image is locally jointly processed in the spatial and spectral dimensions within a multicomponent scanning window (MSW), as small as 7 × 7 × 7 spatial-spectral pixels. Each MSW is regarded as an additive mixture of spectrally correlated fractal Brownian motion (fBm)-samples and random noise. The main advantage of the proposed method is its ability to accurately estimate band noise variances locally by using spatial and spectral texture correlations from a single textural MSW. For each spectral band, both additive and signal-dependent band noise components are estimated by linear fit of local noise variances obtained from many MSWs distributed over the whole band intensity range. CRLB-based analysis of the estimator performance shows that a good compromise is to jointly process seven adjacent spectral bands. The proposed method performance is assessed first on synthetic fBm-data and on real images with synthesized noise. Finally, four different AVIRIS datasets from 1997 flying season are considered. Good coincidence between additive and signal-dependent AVIRIS random noise components estimates obtained by our method and the estimates retrieved from AVIRIS calibration data is demonstrated. These experiments suggest that it is worth taking into account noise signal-dependency hypothesis for processing AVIRIS data.

1 March 2017 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TPTristan Petit
Tristan Petit
TBTouria Bajjouk
Touria Bajjouk
PMPascal Mouquet
Pascal Mouquet
SRSébastien Rochette
Sébastien Rochette
Benoit VozelBenoit Vozel
Benoit Vozel
CDChristophe Delacourt
Christophe Delacourt

1 January 2013 in Journal of Electronic Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MUMykhail Uss
Mykhail Uss
Benoit VozelBenoit Vozel
Benoit Vozel
Vladimir LukinVladimir Lukin
Vladimir Lukin
Kacem CHEHDIKacem CHEHDI
Kacem CHEHDI
We deal with the problem of blind parameter estimation of signal-dependent noise from mono-component image data. Multispectral or color images can be processed in a component-wise manner. The main results obtained rest on the assumption that the image texture and noise parameters estimation problems are interdependent. A two-dimensional fractal Brownian motion (fBm) model is used for locally describing image texture. A polynomial model is assumed for the purpose of describing the signal-dependent noise variance dependence on image intensity. Using the maximum likelihood approach, estimates of both fBm-model and noise parameters are obtained. It is demonstrated that Fisher information (FI) on noise parameters contained in an image is distributed nonuniformly over intensity coordinates (an image intensity range). It is also shown how to find the most informative intensities and the corresponding image areas for a given noisy image. The proposed estimator benefits from these detected areas to improve the estimation accuracy of signal-dependent noise parameters. Finally, the potential estimation accuracy (Cramér-Rao Lower Bound, or CRLB) of noise parameters is derived, providing confidence intervals of these estimates for a given image. In the experiment, the proposed and existing state-of-the-art noise variance estimators are compared for a large image database using CRLB-based statistical efficiency criteria.

29 July 2016 in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MUMikhail L. Uss
Mikhail L. Uss
Benoit VozelBenoit Vozel
Benoit Vozel
Vladimir LukinVladimir Lukin
Vladimir Lukin
Kacem CHEHDIKacem CHEHDI
Kacem CHEHDI
This paper focuses on the potential accuracy of remote sensing (RS) image registration. We investigate how this accuracy can be estimated without ground truth available and used to improve registration quality of mono- and multimodal pair of images. At the local scale of image fragments, the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) on registration error is estimated for each local correspondence between coarsely registered pair of images. This CRLB is defined by local image texture and noise properties. Opposite to the standard approach, where registration accuracy is only evaluated at the output of the registration process, such valuable information is used by us as an additional input knowledge. It greatly helps in detecting and discarding outliers and refining the estimation of geometrical transformation model parameters. Based on these ideas, a new area-based registration method called registration with accuracy estimation (RAE) is proposed. In addition to its ability to automatically register very complex multimodal image pairs with high accuracy, the RAE method is able to provide registration accuracy at the global scale as a covariance matrix of estimation error of geometrical transformation model parameters or as pointwise registration standard deviation. This accuracy does not depend on any ground truth availability and characterizes each pair of registered images individually. Thus, the RAE method can identify image areas for which a predefined registration accuracy is guaranteed. This is essential for RS applications imposing strict constraints on registration accuracy such as change detection, image fusion, and disaster management. The RAE method is proved successful with reaching subpixel accuracy while registering eight complex mono-/multimodal and multitemporal image pairs including optical-to-optical, optical-to-radar, optical-to-digital elevation model (DEM) images, and DEM-to-radar cases. Other methods employed in comparisons fail to provide in a stable manner accurate results on the same test cases.