Background: In recent years, the abusive use of the smartphone has reached a situation that could be considered pathological. In this sense, different instruments to assess this problematic use or addiction to the smartphone are used. One of these instruments is the Smartphone Addition Inventory (SPAI), which has been validated in the Spanish language (SPAI-Spain). The main difficulty of these scales is to establish a cut-off point that determines such mobile addiction. On the other hand, self-perception was used in different addictions as a predictor of the problem. Aim: The objective of this study was to establish the cut-off point in the scores of the SPAI-Spain, using as a reference the self-perception of addiction values. Methods: A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was carried out, establishing as the cut-off point the one that presented a higher value of Youden J, indicative of its sensitivity and specificity. Results: 2958 participants from the university community completed the SPAI–Spain questionnaire. Differences in SPAI–Spain scores were found among age groups and gender, even though not all of them were statistically significant. When using the self-perception of smartphone addiction as the benchmark value, a score of 44 was established as the cutting point of the SPAI-Spain questionnaire, with a Youden J corresponding to 0.416. Conclusions: The implementation of a cut-off point of the SPAI-Spain questionnaire makes it an instrument that allows early identification of those individuals at risk of addiction, as well as the establishment of preventive and/or intervention measures.

All nurses should receive training and education regarding pain as part of their pre-graduate stage, as its assessment and appropriate management when treating patients largely depends on them. With the right knowledge it is possible to reduce its high prevalence, as well as the serious consequences it can lead to. To determine the level of knowledge and attitudes towards pain of final-year nursing students in Spain. Descriptive cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of five Spanish universities during the academic year 2020-2021. The Spanish version of the Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP) was used. In addition, socio-demographic variables such as age, sex, relationship status, employment status, and the number of dependants were collected. The specific palliative or oncology subjects of each university was also assessed. A total of 224 questionnaires were collected. One of the nursing universities obtained the best score in the KASRP (59.75%) which was significant (p = .001). This university was the only one that offers specific subjects in palliative or oncologic care. A training deficit in aspects related to pain assessment and pharmacologic concepts was detected. We found no relationship between the KASRP and the different sociodemographic variables. Specific training in palliative care improves the students' knowledge regarding pain, although the results did not reach an acceptable minimum. The universities' training programs for Spanish students need to be adapted in order to achieve better results.

Introduction: A lack of professional communication and collaboration may be one of the main causes of medication errors. The objective was to evaluate the results of the implementation of ISBAR as a communication and safety tool in a Lithotripsy and Endourologic Unit of a tertiary public hospital. Methods: A total of 457 patients were included in a retrospective study from 2014 to 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (357 patients) in which an endourological procedure was performed before march of 2018 (without the implementation of ISBAR tool) and Group B (100 patients) with the implementation of ISBAR tool. The inclusion criteria were patients accepted for surgical intervention by anaesthesiology Department and operated in the period of the study. The variables analysed included number of procedures, global, intraoperative and postoperative complications rate, urinary infection or sepsis, NPR (FMEA), percentage of suspended surgical patients and hospital stay. Results: The postoperative complications showed no significant differences between groups, but a trend to diminishing was seen in the complication in the group B. The sepsis reduced its incidence and it was close to significant difference. The operative time was shorter in group B 119,11min (114,63–123,59) vs 115,11min (109,63–121,67) p = 0,3. The reduction in the main postoperative complication (sepsis) explained the lower hospital stay for group B. The severe adverse events detected were reduced completely. Conclusions: ISBAR tool was an effective patient safety tool improving quality care. To provide safe patient care and improving quality is indispensable an effective communication flow.

Background: Introduction. Arnold Chiari Malformation (ACM) type I is a pathology whose symptomatology has repercussions for the quality of life of those affected by it. Quality-of-life measurement instruments can allow the severity of the impact of Chiari type I malformation on patients’ lives to be monitored. The Chiari Symptom Profile (CSP) is a valid and reliable instrument designed for this purpose. The aim of the study was to adapt the CSP to Spanish and to explore the reliability and validity of this construct in the context of Spanish-speaking patients with ACM. Methods: The English CSP instrument has a good internal validity and consistency. We used a standardized procedure for the linguistic validation of the translated scale. For the psychometric validation, we recruited 215 individuals with ACM and calculated the Cronbach’s alpha for the sample. The construct was validated by analyzing the age, sex, and presence of syringomyelia, as well as by correlating the results with the sickness impact profile 30 (SIP-30) questionnaire, which can also evaluate quality of life in this type of patient. Results: The Spanish version of the CSP has good internal consistency and validity (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.90); age, sex, and the presence of syringomyelia does not significantly affect the quality of life of patients with ACM. There was a direct and significant correlation between the Spanish CSP and the validated SIP-30 questionnaire results (p < 0.05). Further analysis showed a positive correlation for the physical and psychological scopes of the CSP and SIP-30 questionnaires, but not for their functional and social scopes. Conclusion: This version of the CSP is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring quality of life in patients with ACM in the Spanish context.

Background: Trauma is the most common cause of death and disability in the paediatric population. There are a huge number of variables involved in the care they receive from health care professionals.Aim: The aim of this study was to review the available evidence of initial paediatric trauma care throughout the health care process with a view to create quality indicators (QIs).Study Design: A systematic review was performed from Cochrane Library, Medline, Scopus and SciELO between 2010 and 2020. Studies and guidelines that examined quality or suggested QI were included. Indicators were classified by health care setting, Donabedian's model, risk of bias and the quality of the publication with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) assessment.Results: The initial search included 686 articles, which were reduced to 22, with 15 primary and 7 secondary research articles. The snowball sampling technique was used to add a further seven guidelines and two articles. From these, 534 possible indicators were extracted, summarizing them into 39 and grouping the prehospital care indicators as structure (N = 5), process (N = 12) and outcome (N = 3) indicators and the hospital care indicators as structure (N = 4), process (N = 10) and outcome (N = 6) indicators. Most of the QIs have been extracted from US studies. They are multidisciplinary and in some cases are based on an adaptation of the QIs of adult trauma care.Conclusions: There was a clear gap and large variability between the indicators, as well as low‐quality evidence. Future studies will validate indicators using the Delphi method.Relevance to Clinical Practice: Design a QI framework that may be used by the health system throughout the process. Indicators framework will get nurses, to assess the quality of health care, detect deficient areas and implement improvement measures.