Objectives: Currently available research data points to COVID-19-related multi-organ system damage. This study aims to evaluate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the reproductive health, that is, plasma levels of FSH, LH, estradiol, AMH, and antral follicular count, of women undergoing level II ART techniques. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study by the reproductive medicine centers of Palermo’s Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello Hospital and Vanvitelli University. From September 2022 to March 2024, 203 patients aged 24–43 were enrolled, all with diagnosed infertility and a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Symptomatic women, patients testing positive for HIV or other liver viruses, and patients with a history of ovarian cancer or who had taken gonadotoxic drugs were excluded. Plasma measurements of FSH, LH, estradiol, AMH, and antral follicular count were performed before and after infection. Results: The analysis accounting for the concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) before and after COVID-19 infection shows an average concentration decrease from 1.33 ng/mL before SARS-CoV-2 infection to 0.97 ng/mL after infection. Average decrease after infection was −27.4%; average reduction of 1 follicle (95% CI: from −0.74 to −1.33) was reported following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Levels of E2 before and after SARS-CoV-2 infection did not vary significantly. Average FSH and LH levels before and after SARS-CoV-2 infection pointed to an increase. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 infection damages female reproductive health, causing significant reductions in AMH (−27.4%) and AFC (−1 antral follicle) values and an increase in FSH (+13.6%) and LH (+13.4%) values. No effect on E2 levels was reported. The pandemic has also affected the ability of infertile patients to access ART procedures, and that calls for a novel, updated blueprint designed to enhance our preparedness in the event that similar circumstances should occur again.

Background and Objectives: The type of instrumentation used during laparoscopic surgery might impact on the learning curve of resident surgeons. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in operator satisfaction and surgical outcomes between tissue sealers and classic bipolar instruments during gynecological laparoscopies performed by residents. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study conducted at two tertiary university hospitals between March 2019 and March 2021, on consecutive procedures: salpingo-oophorectomies (Group 1) and salpingectomies (Group 2), subdivided according to the utilized device: radiofrequency tissue sealers (Groups A1 and A2) or bipolar forceps (Groups B1 and B2). Results: 80 procedures were included. Concerning salpingo-oophorectomies, better visibility (8.4 ± 0.8 vs. 7.3 ± 0.9; p = 0.03), reduced difficulty (5.4 ± 1.2 vs. 7.0 ± 1.4; p = 0.02), improved overall satisfaction (9.2 ± 0.4 vs. 7.6 ± 1.0; p = 0.02) and reduced procedure time (7.8 ± 3.4 vs. 12.6 ± 3.1; p = 0.01) were reported by residents using tissue sealers. Intraoperative blood loss (12.2 ± 4.7 mL vs. 33.2 ± 9.7 mL; p = 0.01) and 24 h postoperative pain (4.5 ± 1.1 vs. 5.7 ± 1.8; p = 0.03) were lower in group A1 than B1. For salpingectomies, a significant reduction in duration was found in A2 compared to B2 (7.2 ± 3.4 min vs. 13.8 ± 2.2 min; p = 0.02). Tissue sealers enhanced visibility (8.1 ± 1.1 vs. 6.7 ± 1.4; p = 0.01), difficulty (6.5 ± 1.1 vs. 7.5 ± 0.9; p = 0.04) and improved satisfaction (9.3 ± 0.5 vs. 7.5 ± 0.6; p = 0.01). Moreover, hemoglobin loss and postoperative pain were reduced in A2 relative to B2 [(8.1 ± 4.2 % vs. 4.5 ± 1.1%; p = 0.02) and (5.1 ± 0.9 vs. 4.1 ± 0.8; p = 0.03), respectively] Conclusions: The use of sealing devices by residents was related to reduced difficulty as well improved visibility and overall satisfaction, with improved surgical outcomes.