To compare the acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity profiles between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) using meta-analysis and pooled-analysis from published articles. Literature search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE from inception to March 2017. The odd ratios (ORs) were calculated and random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was performed for the pooled-analysis. Six studies including a total of 859 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients (98.7%) received NCRT. In the meta-analysis, IMRT reduced grade ≥ 2 acute overall GI toxicity, diarrhea and proctitis with ORs of 0.38, 0.32 and 0.60, respectively (all P < 0.05), compared to 3DCRT. IMRT also reduced acute grade ≥ 3 proctitis compared to 3D-CRT (OR, 0.24; P = 0.03). No significant heterogeneity or publication bias was detected. In the pooled-analysis, IMRT reduced the incidence of grade ≥ 2 acute overall GI toxicity, diarrhea, proctitis and GU toxicity (all P < 0.05). Moreover, lower incidence of grade ≥ 3 acute overall GI toxicity, diarrhea and proctitis were observed in the patients treated with IMRT (all P < 0.05). IMRT significantly reduced acute toxicity in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with NCRT compared to 3DCRT.

Lee JH, et al. Brain Neurorehabil. 2022 Nov;15(3):e24. https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2022.15.e24

We hypothesized that hippocampal-sparing radiotherapy via volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) could preserve the neurocognitive function (NCF) of patients with primary brain tumors treated with radiotherapy. We reviewed data from patients with primary brain tumors who underwent hippocampal-sparing brain radiotherapy via VMAT between February 2014 and December 2015. The optimization criteria for the contralateral hippocampus was a maximum dose (Dmax) of less than 17 Gy. For NCF evaluations, the Seoul Verbal Learning Test for total recall, delayed recall, and recognition (SVLT-TR, DR, and Recognition) was performed at baseline and at seven months after radiotherapy. A total of 26 patients underwent NCF testing seven months after radiotherapy. Their median age was 49.5 years (range 26–77 years), and 14 (53.8%) had grade III/IV tumors. The median Dmax to the contralateral hippocampus was 16.4 Gy (range 3.5-63.4). The median mean dose to the contralateral hippocampus, expressed as equivalent to a 2-Gy dose (EQD2/2), was 7.4 Gy2 (0.7–13.1). The mean relative changes in SVLT-TR, SVLT-DR, and SVLT-Recognition at seven months compared to the baseline were − 7.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], − 19.6% to 4.2%), − 9.2% (95% CI, − 25.4% to 7.0%), and − 3.4% (− 12.7% to 5.8%), respectively. Two patients (7.7%) showed deteriorated NCF in the SVLT-TR and SVLT-DR, and three (11.5%) in the SVLT-Recognition. The mean dose of the left hippocampus and bilateral hippocampi were significantly higher in patients showing deterioration of the SVLT-TR and SVLT-Recognition than in those without deterioration. The contralateral hippocampus could be effectively spared in patients with primary brain tumor via VMAT to preserve the verbal memory function. Further investigation is needed to identify those patients who will most benefit from hippocampal-sparing radiotherapy of the primary brain tumor.

This study aimed for a collaborative evaluation of variability in the target volumes for glioblastoma, determined and contoured by different radiotherapy (RT) facilities in Korea. Fifteen panels of radiation oncologists from independent institutions contoured the gross target volumes (GTVs) and clinical target volumes (CTVs) for 3-dimensional conformal RT or intensity-modulated RT on each simulation CT images, after scrutinizing the enhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR images of 9 different cases of glioblastoma. Degrees of contouring agreement were analyzed by the kappa statistics. Using the algorithm of simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE), GTVSTAPLE and CTVSTAPLE contours were derived. Contour agreement was moderate (mean kappa 0.58) among the GTVs and was substantial (mean kappa 0.65) among the CTVs. However, each panels’ GTVs and modification of CTVs regarding anatomical structures varied. Three-fourth of contoured panels’ CTVs encompassed the peritumoral areas of T2-high signal intensity (T2-HSI). Nine of nine GTVSTAPLE encompased the surgical cavity and the T1-enhanced lesions. Eight of nine CTVSTAPLE encompassed the peritumoral T2-HSI area. The median MARGIN90 and the median MARGIN95 were 1.4 cm and 1.5 cm, respectively. Moderate to substantial agreement existed in target volumes for 3-dimensional or intensity-modulated RT determined by radiation oncologists in Korea. According to the estimated consensus contours, the initial CTV encompassed the GTV with margin less than 2.0 cm and the whole peritumoral areas of T2-HSI. The findings of our study propose the need for further studies and modified guidelines.

Wee CW, et al. Radiat Oncol J. 2015 Jun;33(2):98-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2015.33.2.98

Introduction: To evaluate the intra-/interobserver variability of gross target volumes between delineation based on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in patients simulated for stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary lung cancer and lung metastasis. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five patients (27 lesions) who underwent computed tomography and magnetic resonance simulation with the MR-⁶⁰Co system (ViewRay) were included in the study. Gross target volumes were delineated on the magnetic resonance imaging (GTV_MR) and computed tomography (GTV_CT) images by 2 radiation oncologists (RO1 and RO2). Volumes of all contours were measured. Levels of intraobserver (GTV_MR_RO vs GTV_CT_RO) and interobserver (GTV_MR_RO1 vs GTV_MR_RO2; GTV_CT_RO1 vs GTV_CT_RO2) agreement were evaluated using the generalized κ statistics and the paired t test. Results: No significant volumetric difference was observed between all 4 comparisons (GTV_MR_RO1 vs GTV_CT_RO1, GTV_MR_RO2 vs GTV_CT_RO2, GTV_MR_RO1 vs GTV_MR_RO2, and GTV_CT_RO1 vs GTV_CT_RO2; P > .05), with mean volumes of GTVs ranging 5 to 6 cm³. The levels of agreement between those 4 comparisons were all substantial with mean κ values of 0.64, 0.66, 0.74, and 0.63, respectively. However, the interobserver agreement level was significantly higher for GTV_CT compared to GTV_MR ( P <.001). The mean κ values significantly increased in all 4 comparisons for tumors >5 cm³ compared to tumors ≤5 cm³ (all P < .05). Conclusion: No significant differences in volumes between magnetic resonance- and computed tomograpghy-based Gross target volumes were found among 2 ROs. Magnetic resonance-based GTV delineation for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy also demonstrated acceptable interobserver agreement. Tumors >5 cm³ show higher intra-/interobserver agreement compared to tumors <5 cm³. More experience should be accumulated to reduce variability in magnetic resonance-based Gross target volumes delineation in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.