Benő Csapó

Prof. Benő Csapó

University of Szeged, Szeged, Csongrád, Hungary

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 July 2019 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BCBenő Csapó
Benő Csapó
GMGyöngyvér Molnár
Gyöngyvér Molnár
The aims of this paper are: to provide a comprehensive introduction to eDia, an online diagnostic assessment system; to show how the use of technology can contribute to solve certain crucial problems in education by supporting the personalization of learning; and to offer a general reference for further eDia-based studies. The primary function for which the system is designed is to provide regular diagnostic feedback in three main domains of education, reading, mathematics, and science, from the beginning of schooling to the end of the 6 years of primary education. The cognitive foundations of the system, the assessment frameworks, are based on a three-dimensional approach in each domain, distinguishing the psychological (reasoning), the application, and the disciplinary (curricular content) dimensions of learning. The frameworks have been carefully mapped into item banks containing over a 1,000 innovative (multimedia-supported) items in each dimension. The online assessments were piloted, and the system has been operating in experimental mode in over 1,000 schools for several years. This paper outlines the theoretical foundations of the eDia system and summarizes how results from research on the cognitive sciences, learning and instruction, and technology-based assessment have been integrated into a working system designed to assess a large population of students. The paper describes the main functions of eDia and discusses how it supports item writing, constructing tests, online test delivery, automated scoring, data processing, scaling and the provision of feedback both for students and teachers. It shows how diagnostic assessments can be implemented in school practice to facilitate differentiated instruction through regular measurements and to provide instruments for teachers to make formative assessments. Beyond its main function (supporting development toward personalizing education), the eDia platform has been used for assessments in a number of areas from pre-school to higher education both in Hungary and in a number of other countries as well. The paper also reviews results from eDia-based studies and highlights how technology-based assessment extends the possibilities of educational research by making more constructs measurable.

1 December 2014 in Educational Research Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGSamuel Greiff
Samuel Greiff
SWSascha Wüstenberg
Sascha Wüstenberg
BCBenő Csapó
Benő Csapó
Andreas DemetriouAndreas Demetriou
Andreas Demetriou
JHJarkko Hautamäki
Jarkko Hautamäki
RMRomain Martin
Romain Martin

1 May 2013 in Journal of Educational Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGSamuel Greiff
Samuel Greiff
SWSascha Wüstenberg
Sascha Wüstenberg
GMGyöngyvér Molnár
Gyöngyvér Molnár
AFAndreas Fischer
Andreas Fischer
JFJoachim Funke
Joachim Funke
BCBenő Csapó
Benő Csapó

1 August 2013 in Thinking Skills and Creativity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GMGyöngyvér Molnár
Gyöngyvér Molnár
SGSamuel Greiff
Samuel Greiff
BCBenő Csapó
Benő Csapó

1 May 1997 in International Journal of Behavioral Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBenő Csapó
Benő Csapó
This paper links two research paradigms, one that studies attributes and mechanisms of inductive reasoning and one that tries to make school learning more meaningful and knowledge better understood and more easily applied, by examining how inductive reasoning develops during a significant age range of schooling and how it relates to certain other cognitive functions. Six tests of inductive reasoning (number analogies, verbal analogies, number series, verbal series, coding, exclusion) were devised and administered to 3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th, and 11th grade students ( N 2000). Data were also collected on students’ school achievement, and a test of applied science knowledge was administered to the two oldest samples. The comparison of age groups indicated that the fastest development of inductive reasoning took place between the 5th and 9th grades; a major development was detected before the 5th grade, and only modest changes were found after the 9th grade. Regression analysis models indicated that inductive reasoning accounted for around twice as large a proportion of the results of the test that measured the applied science knowledge in everyday situations as did school knowledge (represented by school grades).

1 January 2007 in Educational Research Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PAPhilip Adey
Philip Adey
BCBenő Csapó
Benő Csapó
Andreas DemetriouAndreas Demetriou
Andreas Demetriou
JHJarkko Hautamäki
Jarkko Hautamäki
MSMichael Shayer
Michael Shayer