David Joseph Weber

Dr. David Joseph Weber

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
orcid
Distinguished University Professor

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in Current Molecular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Rosario DonatoRosario Donato
Rosario Donato
BCB. R. Cannon
B. R. Cannon
Guglielmo SorciGuglielmo Sorci
Guglielmo Sorci
Francesca RiuzziFrancesca Riuzzi
Francesca Riuzzi
KHK. Hsu
K. Hsu
CGC. L. Geczy
C. L. Geczy
The S100 protein family consists of 24 members functionally distributed into three main subgroups: those that only exert intracellular regulatory effects, those with intracellular and extracellular functions and those which mainly exert extracellular regulatory effects. S100 proteins are only expressed in vertebrates and show cell-specific expression patterns. In some instances, a particular S100 protein can be induced in pathological circumstances in a cell type that does not express it in normal physiological conditions. Within cells, S100 proteins are involved in aspects of regulation of proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, Ca2+ homeostasis, energy metabolism, inflammation and migration/invasion through interactions with a variety of target proteins including enzymes, cytoskeletal subunits, receptors, transcription factors and nucleic acids. Some S100 proteins are secreted or released and regulate cell functions in an autocrine and paracrine manner via activation of surface receptors (e.g. the receptor for advanced glycation end-products and toll-like receptor 4), G-protein-coupled receptors, scavenger receptors, or heparan sulfate proteoglycans and N-glycans. Extracellular S100A4 and S100B also interact with epidermal growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor, respectively, thereby enhancing the activity of the corresponding receptors. Thus, extracellular S100 proteins exert regulatory activities on monocytes/macrophages/microglia, neutrophils, lymphocytes, mast cells, articular chondrocytes, endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells, neurons, astrocytes, Schwann cells, epithelial cells, myoblasts and cardiomyocytes, thereby participating in innate and adaptive immune responses, cell migration and chemotaxis, tissue development and repair, and leukocyte and tumor cell invasion.

23 January 2015 in Nature Reviews Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAnne R. Bresnick
Anne R. Bresnick
DWDavid Joseph Weber
David Joseph Weber
DZDanna B. Zimmer
Danna B. Zimmer

1 January 2006 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGSarah C. Garrett
Sarah C. Garrett
KVKristen M. Varney
Kristen M. Varney
DWDavid Joseph Weber
David Joseph Weber
ABAnne R. Bresnick
Anne R. Bresnick
Sarah C. Garrett, Kristen M. Varney, David J. Weber, Anne R. Bresnick

26 August 2016 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YCYunting Chen
Yunting Chen
OCOliver B. Clarke
Oliver B. Clarke
JKJonathan Kim
Jonathan Kim
SSSean Stowe
Sean Stowe
YKYoun-Kyung Kim
Youn-Kyung Kim
FMFilippo Mancia
Filippo Mancia
A window into the cell for vitamin A: Vitamin A is an essential nutrient for mammals, and its metabolites affect diverse biological processes. It is carried in the bloodstream as retinol by retinol binding protein (RBP); a protein called STRA6 is implicated in facilitating retinol translocation across the cell membrane. Chen et al. determined the structure of zebrafish STRA6 to a resolution of 3.9 Å by electron microscopy. A lipophilic cleft is a likely binding site for RBP, and an opening in the cleft may allow retinol to diffuse into the membrane. Unexpectedly, the structure also includes bound calcium-modulated protein, but its function remains unclear. Science , this issue p. 887

12 February 1998 in Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAlexander C. Drohat
Alexander C. Drohat
DBDonna M. Baldisseri
Donna M. Baldisseri
RRRichard R. Rustandi
Richard R. Rustandi
DWDavid Joseph Weber
David Joseph Weber

1 May 1992 in Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AMAlbert S. Mildvan
Albert S. Mildvan
DWDavid Joseph Weber
David Joseph Weber
AKAthan Kuliopulos
Athan Kuliopulos
The quantitative effect of a second mutation on a mutant enzyme may be antagonistic, absent, partially additive, additive, or synergistic with respect to the first mutation. Depending on which kinetic or thermodynamic parameter of an enzyme is measured, the same two mutations can interact differently in the double mutant. Additive effects of two mutations on an equilibrium constant, such as the dissociation constant of the enzyme-substrate complex (KS), occur when noninteracting residues which facilitate the same step (substrate binding) are mutated. Partially additive effects result from the cooperative interaction with the substrate of the two residues mutated, and synergistic effects result from the anticooperative interaction with the substrate of the two residues mutated. An alternative explanation for synergy is extensive unfolding of the enzyme. Antagonistic effects on an equilibrium constant such as KS result from opposing structural effects of the two mutations on substrate binding. No additional effect of the second mutation in the double mutant represents a limiting case of either partial additivity or antagonism [corrected]. The interactions of the effects of two mutations on a rate constant such as kcat have the same explanations as those given above for equilibrium constants since the binding of a rate-limiting transition state is occurring. However, due to kinetic complexity, the following exceptions and additions exist. Additive effects of two mutations on kcat occur when noninteracting residues which facilitate the same step are mutated, provided this step is rate limiting. If the affected step is not rate limiting then synergistic effects of the two mutations are observed as each mutation causes the step to become progressively more rate limiting. Additive effects on kcat also occur when the two mutations affect consecutive steps, provided one of them is rate limiting. Partially additive effects on kcat also occur when noninteracting residues facilitating consecutive, non-rate-limiting steps are mutated. These concepts, when applied to published data on double mutants of delta 5-3-ketosteroid isomerase, staphylococcal nuclease, tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, glutathione reductase, and subtilisin, provide deeper insights into the independent, cooperative, anticooperative, or antagonistic interactions of amino acid residues in the binding of substrates, activators, and inhibitors and in promoting catalysis.