Devi Dayal

Prof. Devi Dayal

Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 January 2020 in Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VWVijai Williams
Vijai Williams
MJMuralidharan Jayashree
Muralidharan Jayashree
KNKarthi Nallasamy
Karthi Nallasamy
Devi DayalDevi Dayal
Devi Dayal
ARAmit Rawat
Amit Rawat
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an important complication encountered during the course of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Plasma-Lyte with lower chloride concentration than saline has been shown to be associated with reduced incidence of AKI in adults with septic shock. No study has compared this in DKA. Methods: This double-blind, parallel-arm, investigator-initiated, randomized controlled trial compared 0.9% saline with Plasma-Lyte-A as initial fluid in pediatric DKA. The study was done in a tertiary care, teaching, and referral hospital in India in children (> 1 month–12 years) with DKA as defined by ISPAD. Children with cerebral edema or known chronic kidney/liver disease or who had received pre-referral fluids and/or insulin were excluded. Sixty-six children were randomized to receive either Plasma-Lyte (n = 34) or 0.9% saline (n = 32). Main outcomes: Primary outcome was incidence of new or progressive AKI, defined as a composite outcome of change in creatinine (defined by KDIGO), estimated creatinine clearance (defined by p-RIFLE), and NGAL levels. The secondary outcomes were resolution of AKI, time to resolution of DKA (pH > 7.3, bicarbonate> 15 mEq/L & normal sensorium), change in chloride, pH and bicarbonate levels, proportion of in-hospital all-cause mortality, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and length of ICU and hospital stay. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The incidence of new or progressive AKI was similar in both [Plasma-Lyte 13 (38.2%) versus 0.9% saline 15 (46.9%); adjusted OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.43–3.43, p = 0.70]. The median (IQR) time to resolution of DKA in Plasma-Lyte-A and 0.9% saline were 14.5 (12 to 20) and 16 (8 to 20) h respectively. Time to resolution of AKI was similar in both [Plasma-Lyte 22.1 versus 0.9% saline 18.8 h (adjusted HR 1.72; 95% CI 0.83–3.57; p = 0.14)]. Length of hospital stay was also similar in both [Plasma-Lyte 9 (8 to 12) versus 0.9% saline 10 (8.25 to 11) days; p = 0.39]. Conclusions: The incidence of new or progressive AKI and resolution of AKI were similar in both groups. Plasma-Lyte-A was similar to 0.9% Saline in time to resolution of DKA, need for RRT, mortality, and lengths of PICU and hospital stay. Trial registration: Clinical trial registry of India, CTRI/2018/05/014042 (ctri.nic.in) (Retrospectively registered).

30 October 2018 in Frontiers in Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAnjana Barola
Anjana Barola
PTPramil Tiwari
Pramil Tiwari
ABAnil Bhansali
Anil Bhansali
SGSandeep Grover
Sandeep Grover
Devi DayalDevi Dayal
Devi Dayal
Lipohypertrophy has been suggested as an outcome of lipogenic action of insulin and/or injection-related tissue trauma. In a cross-sectional study, we evaluated the predictors of lipohypertrophy in 372 type 1 diabetes patients (mean age 17.1 years) receiving subcutaneous insulin with pen and/or syringes for ≥3 months. On examining injection sites with inspection and palpation technique, 62.1% patients demonstrated lipohypertrophy. Univariate analysis showed that gender, BMI, HbA1c, injection device, rotation, injection area, needle length, insulin regimen, and total daily dose of insulin were associated with lipohypertrophy (p < 0.05). Notably, the mean needle reuse was comparable in patients with or without lipohypertrophy (8.1 vs. 7.2, p = 0.534). In multivariate logistic regression, gender, HbA1c, TDD, injection devices, and needle length lost its significance. Further, injections over smaller area (≤8.5 × 5.5 cm) and non-rotation of sites were found to be strongest independent predictor of lipohypertrophy (p < 0.0005 for both) with increased odds of 23.2 (95% CI 9.1–59.2) and 6.3 (95% CI 3.4–11.9) times, respectively. Being underweight was also a significant independent predictor (odds ratio [OR] 13.0 [95% CI 2.2–75.2], p = 0.004). Compared to rapid plus long-acting analogs, regular insulin plus long-acting analogs and conventional premixed insulin users had 3.2 (95% CI 1.5–6.8, p = 0.003) and 4.6 (95% CI 1.4–15.7, p = 0.014) fold higher risk of lipohypertrophy (mean injection frequency 4.01 vs. 4.01 vs. 2.09, respectively). Sub-group analysis showed that lipohypertrophy was 79% less likely in patients with multiple daily injections (≥4) than twice-daily regimen (OR 0.21, p < 0.0005). Moreover, lipohypertrophy was reduced to half with bolus doses of rapid-acting insulin analogs than regular insulin (p = 0.003), even though mean injection frequency was comparable (4.01 vs. 3.93, p = 0.229). This difference was statistically insignificant for basal doses with NPH or long-acting analogs (p = 0.069). Therefore, injection area, rotation, BMI, and insulin regimen are the best predictors of lipohypertrophy and together could correctly identify lipohypertrophy status in 84.4% patients with excellent discrimination capability (AUC = 0.906, p < 0.0005). In conclusion, findings of our study suggest that delivering rapidly absorbed insulin analogs over large injection area along with greater split of total daily doses reduce insulin-induced lipogenesis and outplay tissue trauma added through frequent injections and needle reuse.

23 June 2020 in Acta Paediatrica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Devi DayalDevi Dayal
Devi Dayal
SGSaniya Gupta
Saniya Gupta
DRDhvani Raithatha
Dhvani Raithatha
MJMuralidharan Jayashree
Muralidharan Jayashree
Click on the article title to read more.

25 July 2018 in Digestive Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NKNavchetan Kaur
Navchetan Kaur
SBSanjay K. Bhadada
Sanjay K. Bhadada
RMRanjana Walker Minz
Ranjana Walker Minz
Devi DayalDevi Dayal
Devi Dayal
RKRakesh Kochhar
Rakesh Kochhar
Background: A complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors contributes to disease etiology of most of the autoimmune disorders. Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and celiac disease (CD) are polygenic autoimmune diseases that have high propensity to coexist due to shared etiological factors like genetics and clinico-pathological overlaps. Summary: The mean prevalence rate for coexistence of these diseases is 8%, and this value is a gross underestimation as reported from biopsy-proven symptomatic cases. The prevalence rate will rise when studies will excavate bottom layers of the “celiac iceberg” to detect potential and silent celiac cases. The concomitant presence of both these disorders is a complex situation immunologically as well as clinically. There is an accentuated breakdown of tolerance and proinflammatory cytokine storm that leads to the progression of organ-specific autoimmunity to systemic. No immunomodulating drugs are advocated as exogenous insulin supplementation and gluten exclusion are recommended for T1DM and CD respectively. Nevertheless, these pose certain challenges to both the clinicians and the patients, as gluten free diet (GFD) has been described to have an impact on glycemic control, bone health, and vascular complications. Also intermittent gluten intake by these patients due to non-compliance with GFD also stimulates the autoreactive immune cells that result in an augmented immune response. Key Messages: Large public health studies are needed to estimate the prevalence of all forms of CD in T1DM patients. Strict global guidelines need to be formulated for the disease management and prognosis, and there is also a need for an extensive research on each front to thoroughly understand the co-occurrence of these diseases.

1 March 2003 in The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPratibha Singhi
Pratibha Singhi
Devi DayalDevi Dayal
Devi Dayal
NKN. Khandelwal
N. Khandelwal
The appropriate duration of albendazole therapy in neurocysticercosis remains to be determined. Observations in small, uncontrolled clinical trials that short course therapy is as effective as longer regimens must be tested by proper trials. To compare efficacy of 1 and 4 weeks of albendazole therapy in children with neurocysticercosis. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial at the Pediatric Neurocysticercosis Clinic of Advanced Pediatric Centre, a tertiary care teaching hospital. We observed 122 consecutive children with seizures and either a single small enhancing computerized tomographic lesion or up to 3 lesions on head computerized tomography (CT) examination. All children received albendazole (15 mg/kg/day) for 7 days followed by either albendazole or placebo for the following 21 days according to their random number allocation. CT scans were repeated at 1 and 3 months after completion of therapy. Codes opened at the completion of study revealed that 60 children had received albendazole for 28 days (Group A) and 62 received albendazole for 7 days (Group B). All children were followed for at least 2 years. Complete resolution of lesions was similar in the two therapy groups on the first (42% vs. 39%) and second (77% vs. 79%) follow-up CT. Reduction in total number and size was also similar. Also the proportion of lesions that calcified (5% vs. 10%) did not differ significantly. Seizure control at 2 years was similar in the 2 groups. In this clinical trial 1 week of albendazole therapy was as effective as 4 weeks of therapy in children with neurocysticercosis having one to three lesions.

8 April 2020 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
Devi DayalDevi Dayal
Devi Dayal
SGSaniya Gupta
Saniya Gupta
The reasons for a wide variation in severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) across the affected countries of the world are not known. Two recent studies have suggested a link between the BCG vaccination policy and the morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19. In the present study we compared the impact of COVID-19 in terms of case fatality rates (CFR) between countries with high disease burden and those with BCG revaccination policies presuming that revaccination practices would have provided added protection to the population against severe COVID-19. We found a significant difference in the CFR between the two groups of countries. Our data further supports the view that universal BCG vaccination has a protective effect on the course of COVID-19 probably preventing progression to severe disease and death. Clinical trials of BCG vaccine are urgently needed to establish its beneficial role in COVID-19 as suggested by the epidemiological data, especially in countries without a universal BCG vaccination policy.