Pranab Dey

Pranab Dey


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 April 2010 in Diagnostic Cytopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PDPranab Dey
Pranab Dey

31 December 2010 in Diagnostic Cytopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSwapan Samanta
Swapan Samanta
PDPranab Dey
Pranab Dey

8 September 2006 in Cytopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WAW. T. Abodief
W. T. Abodief
PDPranab Dey
Pranab Dey
OAO. Al‐Hattab
O. Al‐Hattab

11 February 2011 in Diagnostic Cytopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NSNidhi Sharma
Nidhi Sharma
PDPranab Dey
Pranab Dey

20 December 2017 in Diagnostic Cytopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RSRajiv Savala
Rajiv Savala
PDPranab Dey
Pranab Dey
NGNalini Gupta
Nalini Gupta

31 August 2016 in Cytojournal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSuvradeep Mitra
Suvradeep Mitra
PDPranab Dey
Pranab Dey
In recent times, the diagnosis of breast lesions has mostly become dependent on core needle biopsies (CNBs) with a gradual reduction in the rate of performing fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Both the procedures have their pros and cons and outsmart each other taking into account different parameters. Both the methods are found to be fraught with loopholes, taking into account different performance indices, diagnostic accuracy and concordance, patient benefit, and cost-effectiveness. Unlike the popular belief of an absolute superiority of CNB over FNAC, the literature review does not reveal a very distinct demarcation in many aspects. We recommend judicious use of these diagnostic modalities in resource-limited settings and screening programs taking into account parameters such as palpability and availability of an experienced cytopathologist.