Douglas Nix

Mr. Douglas Nix

Compliance inSight Consulting Inc.
+2
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 October 2019 in Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YCYuvin Chinniah
Yuvin Chinniah
DNDouglas Nix
Douglas Nix
SJSabrina JOCELYN
Sabrina JOCELYN
DBDamien Burlet-Vienney
Damien Burlet-Vienney
RBRéal Bourbonnière
Réal Bourbonnière
AMAbdallah Ben Mosbah
Abdallah Ben Mosbah
Industrial machines are known to possess many hazards. There are many laws, regulations, standards and practices that aim at ensuring that machines are safe for different workers performing various tasks including operation and maintenance. Safeguards protect workers by stopping hazardous motion when actuated. Those safeguards are integrated into machinery using two widely used international standards for functional safety. However, these standards have some significant differences although they are both based on similar principles. This paper explores those differences and their potential impacts. Subjectivity in the specification and design of safety systems, based on the differences, can lead to different levels of reliability in the safety systems even when considering the same hazard zone of machinery based on which standard is used.