Eduardo Picón

Dr. Eduardo Picón

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 November 2019 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EPEduardo Picón
Eduardo Picón
Onésimo Juncos-RabadánOnésimo Juncos-Rabadán
Onésimo Juncos-Rabadán
CLCristina Lojo-Seoane
Cristina Lojo-Seoane
MCMaria Campos-Magdaleno
Maria Campos-Magdaleno
SMSabela C. Mallo
Sabela C. Mallo
David FacalDavid Facal
David Facal
(1) Background: Early identification of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in people reporting subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) and the study of progression of cognitive decline are important issues in dementia research. This paper examines whether empirically derived procedures predict progression from MCI to dementia. (2) Methods: At baseline, 192 participants with SCC were diagnosed according to clinical criteria as cognitively unimpaired (70), single-domain amnestic MCI (65), multiple-domain amnestic MCI (33) and multiple-domain non-amnestic MCI (24). A two-stage hierarchical cluster analysis was performed for empirical classification. Categorical regression analysis was then used to assess the predictive value of the clusters obtained. Participants were re-assessed after 36 months. (3) Results: Participants were grouped into four empirically derived clusters: Cluster 1, similar to multiple-domain amnestic MCI; Cluster 2, characterized by subjective cognitive decline (SCD) but with low scores in language and working memory; Cluster 3, with specific deterioration in episodic memory, similar to single-domain amnestic MCI; and Cluster 4, with SCD but with scores above the mean in all domains. The majority of participants who progressed to dementia were included in Cluster 1. (4) Conclusions: Cluster analysis differentiated between MCI and SCD in a sample of people with SCC and empirical criteria were more closely associated with progression to dementia than standard criteria.

1 January 2008 in Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PRPaula Vázquez Rodríguez
Paula Vázquez Rodríguez
EPEduardo Picón
Eduardo Picón
MLM. Ángeles López-Cabarcos
M. Ángeles López-Cabarcos
EPEduardo Picón-Prado
Eduardo Picón-Prado
PVPaula Vázquez-Rodríguez
Paula Vázquez-Rodríguez

27 December 2025 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
David FacalDavid Facal
David Facal
EPEduardo Picón
Eduardo Picón
HBHelena M. Blumen
Helena M. Blumen
CLCristina Lojo-Seoane
Cristina Lojo-Seoane
AVAna Nieto Vieites
Ana Nieto Vieites
APArturo X. Pereiro
Arturo X. Pereiro
Background: Cognitive and physical functions share certain age-related patterns of change, including slowed processing speed and movement. Both functions are multifaceted, and the association between them can be affected by the type of measurement considered. This study examined one-to-one relationships between cognitive and physical functions, using data from the Compostela Aging Study. Methods: A total of 267 middle-aged and older individuals without cognitive impairment were included in the study (mean age 65.57, 75.7% women). The relationship between cognitive and physical performance was examined using Spearman’s rho, adjusted for age and sex. Results: Standing up, sitting down and total times in the Timed-Up and Go test were significantly correlated with performance on the Trail-Making and phonological fluency tests. Turning time in the Timed-Up and Go test and self-reported physical activity were correlated with performance on the Spanish version of the California Verbal Learning Test. Grip strength was correlated with performance on the Counting Span task. Conclusions: This study adds evidence to the one-to-one relationship between cognitive and physical function in a subclinical cohort of middle-aged and older adults.