Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions’ effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior—several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people’s initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors.

Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled digital interventions are increasingly used to expand access to mental health care. This PRISMA-ScR scoping review maps how AI technologies support mental health care across five phases: pre-treatment (screening), treatment (therapeutic support), post-treatment (monitoring), clinical education, and population-level prevention. Methods: We synthesized findings from 36 empirical studies published through January 2024 that implemented AI-driven digital tools, including large language models (LLMs), machine learning (ML) models, and conversational agents. Use cases include referral triage, remote patient monitoring, empathic communication enhancement, and AI-assisted psychotherapy delivered via chatbots and voice agents. Results: Across the 36 included studies, the most common AI modalities included chatbots, natural language processing tools, machine learning and deep learning models, and large language model-based agents. These technologies were predominantly used for support, monitoring, and self-management purposes rather than as standalone treatments. Reported benefits included reduced wait times, increased engagement, and improved symptom tracking. However, recurring challenges such as algorithmic bias, data privacy risks, and workflow integration barriers highlight the need for ethical design and human oversight. Conclusion: By introducing a four-pillar framework, this review offers a comprehensive overview of current applications and future directions in AI-augmented mental health care. It aims to guide researchers, clinicians, and policymakers in developing safe, effective, and equitable digital mental health interventions.

Current research on moral identity shows that moral identity predicts moral action in Western cultures but not in non-Western cultures. The present paper argues that this may be due to the fact that the concept of moral identity is culturally biased. In order to remedy this situation, we argue that researchers should broaden their scopes of inquiry by adding a cultural lens to their studies of moral identity. This change is important because although some concept of moral identity likely exists in all cultures, it may function in different ways and at different levels in each place. We propose that moral identity is a context-dependent construct tied to varying social and cultural obligations. We argue that Western moral identity stresses an individually oriented morality, whereas, people from Eastern cultures consider a highly moral person to be societally oriented. We conclude by discussing the implications of this view for future research.