HUMBERTO CAUSIN

Dr. HUMBERTO CAUSIN

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 August 2022 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VTVanesa E. Tossi
Vanesa E. Tossi
LTLeandro J. Martínez Tosar
Leandro J. Martínez Tosar
LLLeandro E. Laino
Leandro E. Laino
JIJesica Iannicelli
Jesica Iannicelli
JRJosé Javier Regalado
José Javier Regalado
SPSandra Irene Pitta-Álvarez
Sandra Irene Pitta-Álvarez
Polyploidy, defined as the coexistence of three or more complete sets of chromosomes in an organism’s cells, is considered as a pivotal moving force in the evolutionary history of vascular plants and has played a major role in the domestication of several crops. In the last decades, improved cultivars of economically important species have been developed artificially by inducing autopolyploidy with chemical agents. Studies on diverse species have shown that the anatomical and physiological changes generated by either natural or artificial polyploidization can increase tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses as well as disease resistance, which may positively impact on plant growth and net production. The aim of this work is to review the current literature regarding the link between plant ploidy level and tolerance to abiotic and biotic stressors, with an emphasis on the physiological and molecular mechanisms responsible for these effects, as well as their impact on the growth and development of both natural and artificially generated polyploids, during exposure to adverse environmental conditions. We focused on the analysis of those types of stressors in which more progress has been made in the knowledge of the putative morpho-physiological and/or molecular mechanisms involved, revealing both the factors in common, as well as those that need to be addressed in future research.

1 January 1996 in Journal of Plant Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BJBarneix Atilio J.
Barneix Atilio J.
HUMBERTO CAUSINHUMBERTO CAUSIN
HUMBERTO CAUSIN

1 June 2021 in Environmental and Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VTVanesa E. Tossi
Vanesa E. Tossi
LTLeandro Martínez Tosar
Leandro Martínez Tosar
SPSandra I. Pitta-Álvarez
Sandra I. Pitta-Álvarez
HUMBERTO CAUSINHUMBERTO CAUSIN
HUMBERTO CAUSIN

1 February 2012 in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HUMBERTO CAUSINHUMBERTO CAUSIN
HUMBERTO CAUSIN
GRGonzalo Roqueiro
Gonzalo Roqueiro
EPEzequiel Petrillo
Ezequiel Petrillo
VLVerónica Láinez
Verónica Láinez
LPLiliana B Pena
Liliana B Pena
SMSara I. Maldonado
Sara I. Maldonado

1 February 2003 in Canadian Journal of Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HUMBERTO CAUSINHUMBERTO CAUSIN
HUMBERTO CAUSIN
RWRenata D Wulff
Renata D Wulff
Morphological shade-avoidance responses have been hypothesized to be a form of adaptive plasticity to improve competition for light; however, little is known about their intraspecific variability and their effect on reproductive fitness. To compare plant responses either at a common age or at a common phenological stage, two experiments were conducted with early- and late-flowering Chenopodium album plants exposed to different red (660 nm) to far red (730 nm) ratios. In the first experiment, plant height and number of leaves were recorded at several times during the vegetative stage, and at the onset of flowering, each plant was harvested and other growth traits were measured. In the second experiment, three destructive harvests were performed across the whole plant cycle. Plant growth and development markedly differed between early- and late-flowering plants in all of the conditions tested. Light treatments significantly affected stem length, total leaf number, total leaf area, and relative allocation to leaf biomass. In all families, the response of stem elongation to light treatments decreased later in the development, while changes in the other plastic responses were mostly due to variations in plant growth. No significant treatment effect was found on relative biomass allocation to reproductive structures. However, individual seed mass significantly differed between certain groups, indicating that light quality can affect reproductive fitness through changes in traits other than fruit or seed set.Key words: Chenopodium album, fitness, intraspecific variability, phenotypic plasticity, red to far red ratio, shade-avoidance responses.

1 December 2009 in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HUMBERTO CAUSINHUMBERTO CAUSIN
HUMBERTO CAUSIN
IRIrma N. Roberts
Irma N. Roberts
MCMaría V. Criado
María V. Criado
SGSusana M. Gallego
Susana M. Gallego
LPLiliana B Pena
Liliana B Pena
ABAtilio J. Barneix
Atilio J. Barneix