Fabio Serpenti

Dr. Fabio Serpenti

Università degli studi di Milano

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 January 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BFBruno Fattizzo
Bruno Fattizzo
Fabio SerpentiFabio Serpenti
Fabio Serpenti
WBWilma Barcellini
Wilma Barcellini
CCChiara Caprioli
Chiara Caprioli
Myelodysplasias with hypocellular bone marrow (hMDS) represent about 10–15% of MDS and are defined by reduced bone marrow cellularity (i.e., <25% or an inappropriately reduced cellularity for their age in young patients). Their diagnosis is still an object of debate and has not been clearly established in the recent WHO classification. Clinical and morphological overlaps with both normo/hypercellular MDS and aplastic anemia include cytopenias, the presence of marrow hypocellularity and dysplasia, and cytogenetic and molecular alterations. Activation of the immune system against the hematopoietic precursors, typical of aplastic anemia, is reckoned even in hMDS and may account for the response to immunosuppressive treatment. Finally, the hMDS outcome seems more favorable than that of normo/hypercellular MDS patients. In this review, we analyze the available literature on hMDS, focusing on clinical, immunological, and molecular features. We show that hMDS pathogenesis and clinical presentation are peculiar, albeit in-between aplastic anemia (AA) and normo/hypercellular MDS. Two different hMDS phenotypes may be encountered: one featured by inflammation and immune activation, with increased cytotoxic T cells, increased T and B regulatory cells, and better response to immunosuppression; and the other, resembling MDS, where T and B regulatory/suppressor cells prevail, leading to genetic clonal selection and an increased risk of leukemic evolution. The identification of the prevailing hMDS phenotype might assist treatment choice, inform prognosis, and suggest personalized monitoring.

17 June 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KBKordelia Barbullushi
Kordelia Barbullushi
NRNicolò Rampi
Nicolò Rampi
Fabio SerpentiFabio Serpenti
Fabio Serpenti
MSMariarita Sciumè
Mariarita Sciumè
SFSonia Fabris
Sonia Fabris
NFNicola Stefano Fracchiolla
Nicola Stefano Fracchiolla
Immunotherapy is changing the therapeutic landscape of many hematologic diseases, with immune checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and CAR-T therapies being its greatest expression. Unfortunately, immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has given less brilliant results up to now, and the only approved drug is the antiCD33 antibody-drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin. A promising field of research in AML therapy relies on anti-leukemic vaccination to induce remission or prevent disease relapse. In this review, we analyze recent evidence on AML vaccines and their biological mechanisms. The principal proteins that have been exploited for vaccination strategies and have reached clinical experimental phases are Wilm’s tumor 1, proteinase 3, and RHAMM. the majority of data deals with WT1-base vaccines, given also the high expression and mutation rates of WT1 in AML cells. Stimulators of immune responses such as TLR7 agonist and interleukin-2 have also proven anti-leukemic activity both in vivo and in vitro. Lastly, cellular vaccines mainly based on autologous or allogeneic off-the-shelf dendritic cell-based vaccines showed positive results in terms of T-cell response and safety, also in elderly patients. Compared to other immunotherapeutic strategies, anti-AML vaccines have the advantage of being a less toxic and a more manageable approach, applicable also to elderly patients with poorer performance status, and may be used in combination with currently available therapies. As for the best scenario in which to use vaccination, whether in a therapeutic, prophylactic, or preemptive setting, further studies are needed, but available evidence points to poorer results in the presence of active or high-burden disease. Given the poor prognosis of relapsed/refractory or high-risk AML, further research is urgently needed to better understand the biological pathways that sustain its pathogenesis. In this setting, research on novel frontiers of immunotherapy-based agents, among which vaccines represent important actors, is warranted to develop new and efficacious strategies to obtain long-term disease control by immune patrolling.

27 November 2020 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BFBruno Fattizzo
Bruno Fattizzo
JGJuri Alessandro Giannotta
Juri Alessandro Giannotta
Fabio SerpentiFabio Serpenti
Fabio Serpenti
WBWilma Barcellini
Wilma Barcellini
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is diagnosed in the presence of anemia, hemolysis, and direct antiglobulin test (DAT) positivity with monospecific antisera. Many confounders of anemia and hemolytic markers should be included in the initial workup (i.e., nutrients deficiencies, chronic liver or kidney diseases, infections, and cancers). Besides classical presentation, there are difficult cases that may challenge the treating physician. These include DAT negative AIHA, diagnosed after the exclusion of other causes of hemolysis, and supported by the response to steroids, and secondary cases (infections, drugs, lymphoproliferative disorders, immunodeficiencies, etc.) that should be suspected and investigated through careful anamnesis physical examination, and specific tests in selected cases. The latter include autoantibody screening in patients with signs/symptoms of systemic autoimmune diseases, immunoglobulins (Ig) levels in case of frequent infections or suspected immunodeficiency, and ultrasound/ computed tomography (CT) studies and bone marrow evaluation to exclude hematologic diseases. AIHA occurring in pregnancy is a specific situation, usually manageable with steroids and intravenous (iv) Ig, although refractory cases have been described. Finally, AIHA may complicate specific clinical settings, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission, reticulocytopenia, treatment with novel anti-cancer drugs, and transplant. These cases are often severe, more frequently DAT negative, and require multiple treatments in a short time.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BFBruno Fattizzo
Bruno Fattizzo
Fabio SerpentiFabio Serpenti
Fabio Serpenti
JGJuri Alessandro Giannotta
Juri Alessandro Giannotta
WBWilma Barcellini
Wilma Barcellini
Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is an intriguing disease that can pose many difficulties to physicians, as well as to hematologists, who are unfamiliar with it. Research regarding its pathophysiologic, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects is still ongoing. In the last ten years, new flow cytometry techniques with high sensitivity enabled us to detect PNH clones as small as <1% of a patient’s hematopoiesis, resulting in increasing incidence but more difficult data interpretation. Particularly, the clinical significance of small PNH clones in patients with bone marrow failures, including aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic syndromes, as well as in uncommon associations, such as myeloproliferative disorders, is still largely unknown. Besides current treatment with the anti-C5 eculizumab, which reduced PNH-related morbidity and mortality, new complement inhibitors will likely fulfill unmet clinical needs in terms of patients’ quality of life and better response rates (i.e., responses in subjects with C5 polymorphisms; reduction of extravascular hemolysis and breakthrough hemolysis episodes). Still, unanswered questions remain for these agents regarding their use in mono- or combination therapy, when to treat, and which drug is the best for which patient. Lastly, long-term safety needs to be assessed in real-life studies. In this review, we describe some clinical vignettes illustrating practical aspects of PNH diagnosis and management; moreover, we discuss recent advances in PNH diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

22 June 2022 in Leukemia & Lymphoma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Fabio SerpentiFabio Serpenti
Fabio Serpenti
MSMariarita Sciumè
Mariarita Sciumè
GGGiulia Galassi
Giulia Galassi
GSGiorgia Saporiti
Giorgia Saporiti
FGFederica Grifoni
Federica Grifoni
FOFrancesco Onida
Francesco Onida
To the Editor,Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the greatest cause of unsuccess and mortality after transplant nowadays. In recent...

12 August 2023 in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DADaniele Avenoso
Daniele Avenoso
VMVarun Mehra
Varun Mehra
LSLiron Barnea Slonim
Liron Barnea Slonim
MFMadson de Farias
Madson de Farias
HAHassan Alshehri
Hassan Alshehri
VPVictoria Potter
Victoria Potter
Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is a curative strategy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The prediction of transplant related mortality (TRM) using the HCT-CI score and an arbitrary upper limit of 55 years for administering myeloablative conditioning (MAC) are common strategies to ensure a safe procedure. Reduced toxicity conditioning regimens are additional methods to deliver safe and effective myeloablation. Herein we report the outcome of AML and MDS patients conditioned with fludarabine and a myeloablative dose of busulfan (FB4) stratified by age and HCT-CI score. The primary objective was overall survival (OS) for patients aged ≥55 years. Secondary objectives were total OS, TRM, graft versus-host disease (GVHD) and GVHD-relapse-free survival (GRFS). The two years' OS in patients aged < 55 and aged ≥ 55 were 72% and 51%, respectively. In patients aged ≥55 with an HCT-CI <2, the estimated two years' OS was 64%, with median OS not reached. In those with HCT-CI ≥2, the two-year OS was 43%, with median OS of 14 months. The total cumulative incidence of relapse was 30% regardless of age or HCT-CI score. FB4 conditioning regimen offers a high rate of prolonged remission with a relapse rate similar to that reported in previous studies. These positive outcomes suggest that this conditioning platform can be offered to patients aged ≥55 in absence of comorbidities, and that age should not be the sole determinate of conditioning intensity.