Background: There is no standard treatment recommended at category 1 level in international guidelines for subsequent therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6) based therapy. We aimed to evaluate which subsequent treatment oncologists prefer in patients with disease progression under CDKi. In addition, we aimed to show the effectiveness of systemic treatments after CDKi and whether there is a survival difference between hormonal treatments (monotherapy vs. mTOR-based). Methods: A total of 609 patients from 53 centers were included in the study. Progression-free-survivals (PFS) of subsequent treatments (chemotherapy (CT, n:434) or endocrine therapy (ET, n:175)) after CDKi were calculated. Patients were evaluated in three groups as those who received CDKi in first-line (group A, n:202), second-line (group B, n: 153) and ≥ 3rd-line (group C, n: 254). PFS was compared according to the use of ET and CT. In addition, ET was compared as monotherapy versus everolimus-based combination therapy. Results: The median duration of CDKi in the ET arms of Group A, B, and C was 17.0, 11.0, and 8.5 months in respectively; it was 9.0, 7.0, and 5.0 months in the CT arm. Median PFS after CDKi was 9.5 (5.0–14.0) months in the ET arm of group A, and 5.3 (3.9–6.8) months in the CT arm (p = 0.073). It was 6.7 (5.8–7.7) months in the ET arm of group B, and 5.7 (4.6–6.7) months in the CT arm (p = 0.311). It was 5.3 (2.5–8.0) months in the ET arm of group C and 4.0 (3.5–4.6) months in the CT arm (p = 0.434). Patients who received ET after CDKi were compared as those who received everolimus-based combination therapy versus those who received monotherapy ET: the median PFS in group A, B, and C was 11.0 vs. 5.9 (p = 0.047), 6.7 vs. 5.0 (p = 0.164), 6.7 vs. 3.9 (p = 0.763) months. Conclusion: Physicians preferred CT rather than ET in patients with early progression under CDKi. It has been shown that subsequent ET after CDKi can be as effective as CT. It was also observed that better PFS could be achieved with the subsequent everolimus-based treatments after first-line CDKi compared to monotherapy ET.

In this study, the interaction of the anticancer drug Nivolumab (NIVO) with dsDNA was investigated using differential pulse (DPV) technique by monitoring the changes in the oxidation signal of adenine and guanine bases on PG electrode. Surface characterization of the PG (pencil graphite) electrode was carried out using cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectrometry techniques and scanning electron microscope, Energy Dispersive X-ray. DPV parameters, the effect of pH on the electrode surface, stirring speed, dsDNA immobilization time, immobilized dsDNA concentrations, NaCl concentration, NIVO concentration interacting with dsDNA were optimized with PG electrode. With the determined parameters, NIVO–dsDNA interaction in PBS (pH 3.0) supporting electrolyte solution was elucidated. In the NIVO–dsDNA interaction using UV technique, the K binding constant and free energy of binding value was found to be 8.93 × 10⁴ and 6.754 kcal mol^–1, respectively. It was determined that the data obtained by electrochemical method were in parallel with the data obtained by spectrometric method. The results obtained electrochemically with high sensitivity, low cost, fast, simple, low detection limit will be the first example of NIVO–dsDNA interaction using PG electrode.

Background and Objectives: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), a marker reflecting both nutritional and immune status, has been associated with prognosis in various malignancies. However, evidence in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), particularly from non-Asian populations, remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of baseline PNI and to develop a blood-based prognostic model in mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone acetate (AA), enzalutamide (ENZA), or cabazitaxel (CABA). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included mCRPC patients treated with AA, ENZA, or CABA before or after docetaxel. PNI was calculated as: 10 × serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (/mm³). Patients were classified into low-PNI (≤40.8) and high-PNI (>40.8) groups using the median PNI value. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods. Results: A total of 299 patients were analyzed: 133 (44.5%) received AA, 106 (35.5%) ENZA, and 60 (20.0%) CABA. Patients with high PNI had significantly longer median overall survival (OS; 30.2 vs. 12.6 months, p < 0.001), radiologic progression-free survival (rPFS; 13.5 vs. 6.7 months, p < 0.001), and PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS; 10.2 vs. 5.1 months, p < 0.001). These associations remained significant across all treatment subgroups. In multivariate analysis, prostate surgery (HR: 0.6), high PNI (HR: 0.5), PSA response (HR: 0.5), and elevated ALP (HR: 1.6) were independent predictors of OS. A prognostic model incorporating PNI, alkaline phosphatase, and anemia stratified patients into four risk groups with distinct OS: 49.1, 30.8, 18.8, and 9.1 months, respectively. Conclusions: This is the largest study to date in a non-Asian mCRPC population showing that baseline PNI is a strong, independent prognostic factor for survival. The proposed blood-based tool may aid in clinical risk stratification, pending prospective validation.

The only phase 3 study on the effectiveness of CDK 4-6 inhibitors in first-line treatment in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer is the MONALEESA-7 study, and data on the effectiveness of palbociclib is limited. Data are also limited regarding the effectiveness of CDK 4-6 inhibitors in patients whose dose was reduced due to neutropenia, the most common side effect of CDK 4-6 inhibitors. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palbociclib and ribociclib in first-line treatment in patients with premenopausal metastatic breast cancer and the effect of dose reduction due to neutropenia on progression-free survival. Our study is a multicenter, retrospective study, and factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS) were examined in patients diagnosed with metastatic premenopausal breast cancer from 29 different centers and receiving combination therapy containing palbociclib or ribociclib in the metastatic stage. 319 patients were included in the study. The mPFS for patients treated with palbociclib was 26.83 months, and for those receiving ribociclib, the mPFS was 29.86 months (p = 0.924). mPFS was 32.00 months in patients who received a reduced dose, and mPFS was 25.96 months in patients who could take the initial dose, and there was no statistical difference (p = 0.238). Liver metastasis, using a fulvestrant together with a CDK 4-6 inhibitor, ECOG PS 1 was found to be a negative prognostic factor. No new adverse events were observed. In our study, we found PFS over 27 months in patients diagnosed with premenopausal breast cancer with CDK 4-6 inhibitors used in first-line treatment, similar to post-menopausal patients. We did not detect any difference between the effectiveness of the two CDK 4-6 inhibitors, and we showed that there was no decrease in the effectiveness of the CDK 4-6 inhibitor in patients whose dose was reduced due to neutropenia.

Objectives: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) represent a significant global health concern due to high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite therapeutic advances, the prognosis for advanced or recurrent cases remains challenging. Nivolumab obtained approval for recurrent or metastatic HNC based on the Phase III CheckMate 141 trial. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world outcomes of nivolumab in patients with non-nasopharyngeal HNC. Design: In this multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed 124 patients with recurrent or metastatic non-nasopharyngeal HNC who received nivolumab in the second-line setting and beyond. Data were collected from 20 different cancer centers across Turkey. The effectiveness and safety of the treatment and survival outcomes were evaluated. Results: Nivolumab exhibited favorable clinical responses, yielding an objective response rate of 29.9% and a disease control rate of 55.7%. Safety assessments revealed a generally well-tolerated profile, with no instances of treatment discontinuation or mortality due to side effects. Survival analysis disclosed a median overall survival (OS) of 11.8 (95% CI 8.4–15.2) months. Multivariate analysis revealed that ECOG-PS ≥ 1 (HR: 1.64, p = 0.045), laryngeal location (HR: 0.531, p = 0.024), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 3.5 (HR: 1.97, p = 0.007) were independent predictors of OS. Conclusions: Nivolumab is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with recurrent or metastatic non-nasopharyngeal HNC in real-world settings. Further studies are needed on factors affecting response to treatment and survival outcomes.