Animal-derived acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are increasingly being used in prepectoral direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction. However, the indications and complication profile associated with this type of reconstruction remain unclear. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the available literature on the use of animal-derived ADM in prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction. Three different literature databases, namely, PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase were screened using the following keywords: "immediate" AND "pre-pectoral" OR "prepectoral" AND "ADM breast reconstruction." Animal-derived ADM used (porcine - Braxon® and non-Braxon® - and bovine - Surgimend®) anthropometric information, clinical data, and complications profile were considered. A total of 340 articles were initially identified, of which only 45 articles (5089 patients and 6598 reconstructed breasts) satisfied our inclusion criteria. The most widely used ADM was Braxon® in the context of conservative mastectomies. In most studies, a subcutaneous layer > 1 cm and lack of previous radiotherapy were considered prerequisites for this type of reconstruction. An increased risk of complications was found in smokers, patients who underwent radiation treatment, patients with high breast volumes, and patients with cancers requiring axillary dissection. Data related to the role of diabetes, high body mass index, and breast implant size on surgical outcomes were instead inconcludent. Age was not directly proportional to the complications. The complications associated with different animal-derived ADMs are generally comparable. The profile of patients required for eligibility for this type of reconstruction appears to have been identified and is in line with current recommendations.

The use of lower-pole sling products has made immediate breast reconstruction a feasible option in women undergoing skin-nipple sparing and skin-reducing mastectomies. To date, available data on the comparative efficacy of biological and synthetic meshes regarding postoperative complications are scattered and limited. A systematic literature search was performed to screen three different databases (PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase) using the following keywords: "breast reconstruction" AND "TiLOOP®" OR "Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh" OR "TCPM". The perioperative and demographic characteristics of patients, complications profiles, and patient-reported outcomes were considered. We initially identified 234 articles, of which only 41, including 3923 patients and 5042 reconstructed breasts, fully satisfied the inclusion criteria. TiLOOP® Bra could be considered a safe and aesthetically valid alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADMs) in non-smokers patients undergoing skin-nipple sparing and skin-reducing mastectomies and immediate reconstruction. In such populations, complications are more likely to develop in patients with extreme body mass index values. The incidence of seroma with TiLOOP® Bra is comparable to that of ADMs as it is the beneficial effect in radiated patients, where TiLOOP® Bra seems superior to implant alone reconstruction. It has a good bio-integration with host tissues and resistance to infections in patients with a weakened immune system as a consequence of oncologic perioperative treatments.

Background: Propeller perforator flaps (PPFs) have gained increasing popularity in lower limb reconstruction. While their use in elective settings is well described, their role in acute post-traumatic reconstruction remains less defined. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched on 2 June 2025, for studies reporting on the use of propeller flaps in lower limb reconstruction after trauma. Only studies rated as “good” quality using the NIH quality assessment tool were included. Data on anatomical location, flap survival, complications, reinterventions, and functional and patient-reported outcomes were extracted and analyzed descriptively. Results: Twenty-eight studies published between 2008 and 2024 were included, accounting for 619 propeller flaps in a population of 838 patients. The majority of flaps were fasciocutaneous, with the posterior tibial artery being the most commonly used source vessel. Among the flaps included, 422 (68.2%) achieved complete survival without necrosis, 84 (13.6%) developed partial necrosis, and 23 (3.7%) failed completely. Considering all flaps that remained viable after any required revisions or conservative management, the overall survival rate was 97%. Venous congestion was the leading cause of flap compromise. The overall complication rate was 21.8%, increasing to 35.1% in acute trauma cases. A statistically significant correlation was found between wide rotation angles (≥150°) and higher complication rates (p = 0.015). The mean follow-up duration was 12.5 months. Functional and aesthetic outcomes were poorly reported, but when available, they were generally favorable. Conclusions: PPFs represent a valuable option for lower limb reconstruction, providing reliable coverage while preserving major vascular axes. Their application in acute trauma settings appears promising, although current evidence is limited by small verified cohorts and predominantly retrospective study designs. Despite higher complication rates in acute cases, flap survival remains consistently high, supporting their use in carefully selected patients. Further prospective studies with standardized outcome reporting are needed to clarify long-term functional results and refine selection strategies.

Summary: The best breast reconstruction solution after mastectomy remains a topic of wide debate. Recently, the focus in the field of implant-based reconstruction has been on the increasing indications for prepectoral reconstruction. This offers undoubted advantages over subpectoral reconstruction, ranging from better aesthetic results and patient comfort to a less invasive procedure that spares the pectoralis major muscle, reducing pain and postoperative recovery time. The dermal sling is a reconstructive variant introduced by Bostwick in the 1990s and is commonly used to complete the subpectoral pocket in one- or two-stage reconstruction, creating a dual-plane reconstruction. This method may be indicated after mastectomy for both therapeutic and prophylactic purposes. It can also be used for unilateral and bilateral reconstructions. We propose a new meshed dermal sling technique that allows complete prepectoral reconstruction without the use of acellular dermal matrix, thus reducing the cost of reconstruction. It also allows the indication for complete prepectoral reconstruction to be extended to patients with medium breast volume and grade 1 or 2 ptosis, without the need to use acellular dermal matrix or the pectoralis major muscle to complete the breast pocket.

Background: One of the main causes of breast reconstruction failure is mastectomy flap necrosis. It is widely acknowledged that the vascularity of the mastectomy flap exhibits a direct correlation with its residual thickness. Previous studies demonstrated the possibility to measure preoperatively the thickness of breast subcutaneous tissue; however, its correlation with the risk of mastectomy skin flap necrosis has not been proved yet. This study aims to evaluate the predictive ability of mammography in identifying patients at risk of ischemic complications of mastectomy flaps. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing mastectomy and implant-based immediate breast reconstruction between January 2015 and December 2022 at ASST-Sette Laghi was conducted. For each patient, breast subcutaneous thickness was assessed at preoperative mammography. The findings were then analyzed and combined with anamnestic, intraoperative, and postoperative data. Results: Of all 647 patients reviewed, 398 (corresponding to 463 breasts) have been enrolled in the study, corresponding to those in which it was possible to evaluate the preoperative mammography. Mastectomy flap ischemia has been found in 57 patients (12.3%), of which 17 (29.8%) underwent reintervention. Heavy smoking, “conservative” mastectomy, higher mastectomy volume, and a preoperative subcutaneous thickness >17 mm were found to be risk factors for mastectomy flap ischemic complications (P > 0.000). Conclusions: Mammography is a good tool to evaluate the preoperative thickness of the breast subcutaneous tissue. In our experience, especially in case of conservative mastectomies, patients with a thicker subcutaneous tissue have higher risk to develop ischemic complication of the mastectomy flap.