Frank Prof. Fitzek

Prof. Frank Prof. Fitzek

TU Dresden
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 October 2022 in Proceedings of the IEEE
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMChiara Marcolla
Chiara Marcolla
VSVictor Sucasas
Victor Sucasas
MMMarc Manzano
Marc Manzano
RBRiccardo Bassoli
Riccardo Bassoli
Frank Prof. FitzekFrank Prof. Fitzek
Frank Prof. Fitzek
NANajwa Aaraj
Najwa Aaraj
Data privacy concerns are increasing significantly in the context of the Internet of Things, cloud services, edge computing, artificial intelligence applications, and other applications enabled by next-generation networks. Homomorphic encryption addresses privacy challenges by enabling multiple operations to be performed on encrypted messages without decryption. This article comprehensively addresses homomorphic encryption from both theoretical and practical perspectives. This article delves into the mathematical foundations required to understand fully homomorphic encryption ( $\textsf {FHE}$ ). It consequently covers design fundamentals and security properties of $\textsf {FHE}$ and describes the main $\textsf {FHE}$ schemes based on various mathematical problems. On a more practical level, this article presents a view on privacy-preserving machine learning using homomorphic encryption and then surveys $\textsf {FHE}$ at length from an engineering angle, covering the potential application of $\textsf {FHE}$ in fog computing and cloud computing services. It also provides a comprehensive analysis of existing state-of-the-art $\textsf {FHE}$ libraries and tools, implemented in software and hardware, and the performance thereof.

12 November 2019 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMMahshid Mehrabi
Mahshid Mehrabi
DYDongho You
Dongho You
VLVincent Latzko
Vincent Latzko
HSHani Salah
Hani Salah
Martin ReissleinMartin Reisslein
Martin Reisslein
Frank Prof. FitzekFrank Prof. Fitzek
Frank Prof. Fitzek
Multi-access edge computing (MEC) has recently been proposed to aid mobile end devices in providing compute-and data-intensive services with low latency. Growing service demands by the end devices may overwhelm MEC installations, while cost constraints limit the increases of the installed MEC computing and data storage capacities. At the same time, the ever increasing computation capabilities and storage capacities of mobile end devices are valuable resources that can be utilized to enhance the MEC. This article comprehensively surveys the topic area of device-enhanced MEC, i.e., mechanisms that jointly utilize the resources of the community of end devices and the installed MEC to provide services to end devices. We classify the device-enhanced MEC mechanisms into mechanisms for computation offloading and mechanisms for caching. We further subclassify the offloading and caching mechanisms according to the targeted performance goals, which include latency minimization, energy conservation, and enhanced security. We identify the main limitations of the existing device-enhanced MEC mechanisms and outline future research directions.

27 August 2021 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JRJustus Rischke
Justus Rischke
PSPeter Sossalla
Peter Sossalla
SISebastian Itting
Sebastian Itting
Frank Prof. FitzekFrank Prof. Fitzek
Frank Prof. Fitzek
Martin ReissleinMartin Reisslein
Martin Reisslein
A 5G campus network is a 5G network for the users affiliated with the campus organization, e.g., an industrial campus, covering a prescribed geographical area. A 5G campus network can operate as a so-called 5G non-standalone (NSA) network (which requires 4G Long-Term Evolution (LTE) spectrum access) or as a 5G standalone (SA) network (without 4G LTE spectrum access). 5G campus networks are envisioned to enable new use cases, which require cyclic delay-sensitive industrial communication, such as robot control. We design a rigorous testbed for measuring the one-way packet delays between a 5G end device via a radio access network (RAN) to a packet core with sub-microsecond precision as well as for measuring the packet core delay with nanosecond precision. With our testbed design, we conduct detailed measurements of the one-way download (downstream, i.e., core to end device) as well as one-way upload (upstream, i.e., end device to core) packet delays and losses for both 5G SA and 5G NSA hardware and network operation. We also measure the corresponding 5G SA and 5G NSA packet core processing delays for download and upload. We find that typically 95% of the SA download packet delays are in the range from 4-10 ms, indicating a fairly wide spread of the packet delays. Also, existing packet core implementations regularly incur packet processing latencies up to 0.4 ms, with outliers above one millisecond. Our measurement results inform the further development and refinement of 5G SA and 5G NSA campus networks for industrial use cases. We make the measurement data traces publicly available as the IEEE DataPort 5G Campus Networks: Measurement Traces dataset (DOI 10.21227/xe3c-e968).

21 March 2019 in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZXZuo Xiang
Zuo Xiang
FGFrank Gabriel
Frank Gabriel
EUElena Urbano
Elena Urbano
GNGiang Truong Nguyen
Giang Truong Nguyen
Martin ReissleinMartin Reisslein
Martin Reisslein
Frank Prof. FitzekFrank Prof. Fitzek
Frank Prof. Fitzek
Software-defined networking (SDN) and network function virtualization (NFV) processed in multi-access edge computing (MEC) cloud systems have been proposed as critical paradigms for achieving the low latency requirements of the tactile Internet. While virtual network functions (VNFs) allow greater flexibility compared to hardware-based solutions, the VNF abstraction also introduces additional packet processing delays. In this paper, we investigate the practical feasibility of NFV with respect to the tactile Internet latency requirements. We develop, implement, and evaluate Chain-based Low latency VNF ImplemeNtation (CALVIN), a low-latency management framework for distributed Service Function Chains (SFCs). CALVIN classifies VNFs into elementary, basic, and advanced VNFs; moreover, CALVIN implements elementary and basic VNFs in the kernel space, while the advanced VNFs are implemented in the user space. Throughout, CALVIN employs a distributed mapping with one VNF per Virtual Machine (VM) in a MEC system. Furthermore, CALVIN avoids the metadata structure processing and batch processing of packets in the conventional Linux networking stack so as to achieve short per-packet latencies. Our rigorous measurements on off-the-shelf conventional networking and computing hardware demonstrate that CALVIN achieves round-trip times from a MEC ingress point via two elementary forwarding VNFs (one in kernel space and one in user space) and a MEC server to a MEC egress point on the order of 0.32 ms. Our measurements also indicate that MEC network coding and encryption are feasible for small 256 byte packets with an MEC latency budget of 0.35 ms; whereas, large 1400 byte packets can complete the network coding, but not the encryption within the 0.35 ms.

21 September 2020 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JRJustus Rischke
Justus Rischke
PSPeter Sossalla
Peter Sossalla
HSHani Salah
Hani Salah
Frank Prof. FitzekFrank Prof. Fitzek
Frank Prof. Fitzek
Martin ReissleinMartin Reisslein
Martin Reisslein
Flow routing can achieve fine-grained network performance optimizations by routing distinct packet traffic flows over different network paths. While the centralized control of Software-Defined Networking (SDN) provides a control framework for implementing centralized network optimizations, e.g., optimized flow routing, the implementation of flow routing that is adaptive to varying traffic loads requires complex models. The goal of this study is to pursue a model-free approach that is based on reinforcement learning. We design and evaluate QR-SDN, a classical tabular reinforcement learning approach that directly represents the routing paths of individual flows in its state-action space. Due to the direct representation of flow routes in the QR-SDN state-action space, QR-SDN is the first reinforcement learning SDN routing approach to enable multiple routing paths between a given source (ingress) switch–destination (egress) switch pair while preserving the flow integrity. That is, in QR-SDN, packets of a given flow take the same routing path, while different flows with the same source-destination switch pair may take different routes (in contrast, the recent DRL-TE approach splits a given flow on a per-packet basis incurring high complexity and out-of-order packets). We implemented QR-SDN in a Software-Defined Network (SDN) emulation testbed. Our evaluations demonstrate that the flow-preserving multi-path routing of QR-SDN achieves substantially lower flow latencies than prior routing approaches that determine only a single source-destination route. A limitation of QR-SDN is that the state-action space grows exponentially with the number of network nodes. Addressing the scalability of direct flow routing, e.g., through routing only high-rate flows, is an important direction for future research. The QR-SDN code is made publicly available to support this future research.

13 April 2023 in IEEE Networking Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PSPaul Schwenteck
Paul Schwenteck
GNGiang Truong Nguyen
Giang Truong Nguyen
HBHolger Boche
Holger Boche
WKWolfgang Kellerer
Wolfgang Kellerer
Frank Prof. FitzekFrank Prof. Fitzek
Frank Prof. Fitzek
The first release of 5G technology is being rolled out worldwide. In parallel, 3GPP is constantly adding new features to upcoming releases covering well-known use cases. This raises the questions i.) when will 6G be introduced?, ii.) how can 6G be motivated for the stakeholders, and iii.) what are the 6G use cases? In this work, we present the perspective of these stakeholders, namely the network operators, manufacturers, and verticals, identifying potential 5G shortcomings and the remaining 6G solution space. We will highlight the Metaverse as the enabler for 6G addressing omnipresent daily challenges and the upcoming energy problem.