Geoffrey Paul Hammond

Prof. Dr. Geoffrey Paul Hammond

University of Bath, Bath, Bath and North East Somerset, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

51Years (1976-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2008 in Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GHGeoffrey Paul Hammond
Geoffrey Paul Hammond
CJC. I. Jones
C. I. Jones
The development of an open-access, reliable database for embodied energy and carbon (dioxide) emissions associated with the construction industry is described. The University of Bath's inventory of carbon and energy database lists almost 200 different materials. The data were extracted from peer-reviewed literature on the basis of a defined methodology and a set of five criteria. The database was made publicly available via an online website and has attracted significant interest from industry, academia, government departments and agencies, among others. Feedback from such professional users has played an important part in the choice of ‘best values’ for ‘cradleto-site’ embodied energy and carbon from the range found in the literature. The variation in published data stems from differences in boundary definitions (including geographic origin), age of the data sources and rigour of the original life-cycle assessments. Although principally directed towards UK construction, the material set included in the database is of quite wide application across the industrial sector. The use of the inventory is illustrated with the aid of 14 case studies of real-world new-build dwellings. It was observed that there was little difference between embodied energy and carbon for houses and apartments until external works were taken into account (energy inputs for roads, connecting pathways, etc.).

1 December 2007 in Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WIWinifred L. Ijomah
Winifred L. Ijomah
CMChristopher A. McMahon
Christopher A. McMahon
GHGeoffrey Paul Hammond
Geoffrey Paul Hammond
SNStephen Newman
Stephen Newman

1 October 2010 in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TFTimothy J. Foxon
Timothy J. Foxon
GHGeoffrey Paul Hammond
Geoffrey Paul Hammond
PPPeter J.G. Pearson
Peter J.G. Pearson


1 January 2001 in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GHGeoffrey Paul Hammond
Geoffrey Paul Hammond
ASA. J. Stapleton
A. J. Stapleton
The exergy method has been used to analyse changes in the structure of the UK energy system over a period of more than 30 years from 1965. A sectoral approach was employed, with the supply side examined in terms of themain energy sources, while final demand was separated into four energy end-use groups: the domestic, service, industrial and transport sectors. Estimates of sector-weighted or ‘lumped’ parameters, such as exergy efficiencies, were obtained from the particular characteristics of each sector. These were employed to determine the exergetic ‘improvement potential’ for critical elements of the energy system. Electricity generation together with final energy demand in the domestic sector and in transport are shown to account for nearly 80 per cent of the Second Law improvement potential. This poor thermodynamic performance is principally due to exergy losses in combustion and heat transfer processes associated with power generation, space heating and main transport modes. The results of the exergy analysis are placed in the context of recent developments in energy market liberalization and of the need to achieve environmental sustainability. They are also contrasted with proposals for new or improved energy technologies to meet the requirements of a sustainable energy strategy. Finally, the role of the exergy method is contrasted with the various other approaches to energy technology assessment.

15 September 2007 in International Journal of Production Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WIW. L. Ijomah
W. L. Ijomah
CMC. A. McMahon
C. A. McMahon
GHGeoffrey Paul Hammond
Geoffrey Paul Hammond
SNStephen Newman
Stephen Newman
Key manufacturing challenges include pollution, natural resource depletion, waste management and landfill space. Remanufacturing, a process of bringing used products to a ‘like-new’ functional state with warranty to match, is being regarded as a vital strategy in waste management and environmentally conscious manufacturing. There is a paucity of remanufacturing knowledge, particularly in design-for-remanufacturing (DFRem) because of its relative novelty in research terms. This paper outlines the elements of the remanufacturing concept, details existing design-for-remanufacturing research and describes findings from recent UK industrial case studies undertaken to verify and augment previous research. It proposes some fundamental steps required to build on past work to improve the robustness of DFRem methodologies.