Gerardo Manuel Anton-Fos

Dr. Gerardo Manuel Anton-Fos

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BSBeatriz Suay-García
Beatriz Suay-García
Jose Bueso-BordilsJose Bueso-Bordils
Jose Bueso-Bordils
Antonio FalcoAntonio Falco
Antonio Falco
Gerardo Manuel Anton-FosGerardo Manuel Anton-Fos
Gerardo Manuel Anton-Fos
PAPedro Alemán-López
Pedro Alemán-López
Traditionally, drug development involved the individual synthesis and biological evaluation of hundreds to thousands of compounds with the intention of highlighting their biological activity, selectivity, and bioavailability, as well as their low toxicity. On average, this process of new drug development involved, in addition to high economic costs, a period of several years before hopefully finding a drug with suitable characteristics to drive its commercialization. Therefore, the chemical synthesis of new compounds became the limiting step in the process of searching for or optimizing leads for new drug development. This need for large chemical libraries led to the birth of high-throughput synthesis methods and combinatorial chemistry. Virtual combinatorial chemistry is based on the same principle as real chemistry—many different compounds can be generated from a few building blocks at once. The difference lies in its speed, as millions of compounds can be produced in a few seconds. On the other hand, many virtual screening methods, such as QSAR (Quantitative Sturcture-Activity Relationship), pharmacophore models, and molecular docking, have been developed to study these libraries. These models allow for the selection of molecules to be synthesized and tested with a high probability of success. The virtual combinatorial chemistry–virtual screening tandem has become a fundamental tool in the process of searching for and developing a drug, as it allows the process to be accelerated with extraordinary economic savings.

4 December 2024 in Journal of Xenobiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jose Bueso-BordilsJose Bueso-Bordils
Jose Bueso-Bordils
Gerardo Manuel Anton-FosGerardo Manuel Anton-Fos
Gerardo Manuel Anton-Fos
RMRafael Vicente Martín-Algarra
Rafael Vicente Martín-Algarra
PAPedro Alemán-López
Pedro Alemán-López
In the field of computational chemistry, computer models are quickly and cheaply constructed to predict toxicology hazards and results, with no need for test material or animals as these computational predictions are often based on physicochemical properties of chemical structures. Multiple methodologies are employed to support in silico assessments based on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). This review introduces the development of computational toxicology, focusing on ML and DL and emphasizing their importance in the field of toxicology. A fine balance between target potency, selectivity, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, toxicity (ADMET) and clinical safety properties should be achieved to discover a potential new drug. It is advantageous to perform virtual predictions as early as possible in drug development processes, even before a molecule is synthesized. Currently, there are numerous commercially available and free web-based programs for toxicity prediction, which can be used to construct various predictive models. The key features of the QSAR method are also outlined, and the selection of appropriate physicochemical descriptors is a prerequisite for robust predictions. In addition, examples of open-source tools applied to toxicity prediction are included, as well as examples of the application of different computational methods for the prediction of toxicity in drug design and environmental toxicology.

1 January 1996 in Journal of Chromatography A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JJJ.V. de Julián-Ortiz
J.V. de Julián-Ortiz
RGRamón García-Domenech
Ramón García-Domenech
JAJ. Gálvez Alvarez
J. Gálvez Alvarez
RRR. Soler Roca
R. Soler Roca
FGF.J. García-March
F.J. García-March
Gerardo Manuel Anton-FosGerardo Manuel Anton-Fos
Gerardo Manuel Anton-Fos

1 January 1996 in Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RGRamón García-Domenech
Ramón García-Domenech
FGF. J. García‐March
F. J. García‐March
RSR. M. Soler
R. M. Soler
JAJorge Galvez Alvarez
Jorge Galvez Alvarez
Gerardo Manuel Anton-FosGerardo Manuel Anton-Fos
Gerardo Manuel Anton-Fos
JJJ. V. De Julián‐Ortiz
J. V. De Julián‐Ortiz

27 July 2001 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LZL. Lahuerta Zamora
L. Lahuerta Zamora
YMY. Fuster Mestre
Y. Fuster Mestre
MDM. J. Duart
M. J. Duart
Gerardo Manuel Anton-FosGerardo Manuel Anton-Fos
Gerardo Manuel Anton-Fos
RGRamón García-Domenech
Ramón García-Domenech
JCJ. Martínez Calatayud
J. Martínez Calatayud

19 May 2006 in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMaría J. Duart
María J. Duart
RGRamón García-Domenech
Ramón García-Domenech
JAJorge Galvez Alvarez
Jorge Galvez Alvarez
PAPedro A. Alemán
Pedro A. Alemán
RMRafael V. Martín-Algarra
Rafael V. Martín-Algarra
Gerardo Manuel Anton-FosGerardo Manuel Anton-Fos
Gerardo Manuel Anton-Fos