Under different pathophysiological conditions, endothelial cells lose endothelial phenotype and gain mesenchymal cell-like phenotype via a process known as endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT). At the molecular level, endothelial cells lose the expression of endothelial cell-specific markers such as CD31/platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule, von Willebrand factor, and vascular-endothelial cadherin and gain the expression of mesenchymal cell markers such as α-smooth muscle actin, N-cadherin, vimentin, fibroblast specific protein-1, and collagens. EndMT is induced by numerous different pathways triggered and modulated by multiple different and often redundant mechanisms in a context-dependent manner depending on the pathophysiological status of the cell. EndMT plays an essential role in embryonic development, particularly in atrioventricular valve development; however, EndMT is also implicated in the pathogenesis of several genetically determined and acquired diseases, including malignant, cardiovascular, inflammatory, and fibrotic disorders. Among cardiovascular diseases, aberrant EndMT is reported in atherosclerosis, pulmonary hypertension, valvular disease, fibroelastosis, and cardiac fibrosis. Accordingly, understanding the mechanisms behind the cause and/or effect of EndMT to eventually target EndMT appears to be a promising strategy for treating aberrant EndMT-associated diseases. However, this approach is limited by a lack of precise functional and molecular pathways, causes and/or effects, and a lack of robust animal models and human data about EndMT in different diseases. Here, we review different mechanisms in EndMT and the role of EndMT in various cardiovascular diseases.

Background/Objectives: Terbinafine has been the gold standard for the management of superficial fungal infections. The etiological agent generally is Trichophyton rubrum (T. rubrum); however, there has been increased reporting of a new terbinafine-resistant strain of the T. mentagrophytes complex (T. mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII otherwise known as T. indotineae). Here, we review the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of T. rubrum and T. indotineae infections. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase (Ovid), and Web of Science, resulting in 83 qualified studies with data summarized for clinical features, antifungal susceptibility, and terbinafine resistance mechanisms and mutations. Results: Dermatophytosis is most commonly caused by T. rubrum; however, in certain parts of the world, especially in the Indian subcontinent, T. indotineae infections have been reported more frequently. The majority of T. rubrum isolates remain susceptible to terbinafine (over 60% of isolates show MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ < 0.5 µg/mL). In contrast, for T. indotineae, 30% of isolates exhibit MIC₅₀ ≥ 0.5 µg/mL and 80% exhibit MIC₉₀ ≥ 0.5 µg/mL. Frequently detected squalene epoxidase (SQLE) mutations in T. rubrum are Phe397Leu/Ile (41.6%) and Leu393Phe (20.8%); in T. indotineae, these include Phe397Leu (33.0%) and Ala448Thr (24.5%). Other potential terbinafine resistance mechanisms in T. rubrum and T. indotineae are discussed. Conclusions: T. rubrum generally remain susceptible in vitro to terbinafine in contrast to T. indotineae. The essential components of an effective antifungal stewardship emphasize accurate clinical and laboratory diagnosis, susceptibility testing, and appropriate antifungal therapy selection with a multidisciplinary approach.

There has been a recent shift in the epidemiology of superficial fungal infections (tinea, dermatophytosis, dermatomycoses). Trichophyton indotineae is an emerging dermatophyte species of significant global concern for its contagious nature and antifungal drug resistance. This scoping review includes available clinical and laboratory assessments of T. indotineae to provide a comprehensive up‐to‐date overview of its epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approaches, antifungal susceptibility patterns, resistance mechanisms and management strategies. We discuss T. indotineae resistance against standard and newer antifungals (terbinafine, griseofulvin and triazoles including fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole). In particular, the terbinafine susceptibility profile of T. indotineae can be linked to squalene epoxidase ( SQLE ) single‐nucleotide variations. For diagnosis, it is not possible to separate T. indotinea e from other members of the T. mentagrophytes complex ( T. mentagrophytes and T. interdigitale ) without access to molecular diagnostic methods. So, in patients presenting with extensive dermatophytoses, with a history of treatment resistance and/or recent travel, molecular diagnosis to confirm T. indotineae infection should be considered. Healthcare providers often face challenges in choosing between terbinafine and itraconazole treatments. While the use of terbinafine is limited due to resistance, itraconazole is hindered by erratic absorption, possible drug interactions and side effects as well as resistance in some cases. Newer treatments being investigated include super‐bioavailable itraconazole, third‐generation triazoles (voriconazole, posaconazole) and topical‐oral combination regimens. The need for improved diagnostic accessibility, judicious antifungal prescribing, and implementing an effective antifungal stewardship program are highlighted.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain a global pandemic and leading cause of deaths worldwide. While several guidelines have been developed to control the development of CVDs, its prevalence keeps on increasing until this day. Cardiovascular risk factors, such as reduced exercises and high fat or glucose diets, culminate in the development of the metabolic syndrome and eventually atherosclerosis, which is driven by high blood lipid and cholesterol levels, and by endothelial dysfunction. Late complications of atherosclerosis give rise to serious clinical cardiovascular manifestations such as myocardial infarction and hypertension. Therefore, endothelial functions and the lipid metabolism play critical roles in the pathogenesis of CVDs. Fatty acid-binding proteins are a family of intracellular proteins expressed in many cell types known mainly for their interaction with and trafficking of cellular lipids. The roles of a number of isoforms in this family have been implicated in lipid metabolic homeostasis, but their influence on endothelial function and vascular homeostasis remain largely unknown. This review’s purpose is to update fundamentals about the connection between cardiovascular disease, metabolism, endothelial function, and mainly the roles of fatty acid-binding proteins.

Endothelial autophagy plays an important role in the regulation of endothelial function. The inhibition of endothelial autophagy is associated with the reduced expression of protein disulfide isomerase 4 (PDIA-4); however, its role in endothelial cells is not known. Here, we report that endothelial cell-specific loss of PDIA-4 leads to impaired autophagic flux accompanied by loss of endothelial function and apoptosis. Endothelial cell-specific loss of PDIA-4 also induced marked changes in endothelial cell architecture, accompanied by the loss of endothelial markers and the gain of mesenchymal markers consistent with endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT). The loss of PDIA-4 activated TGFβ-signaling, and inhibition of TGFβ-signaling suppressed EndMT in PDIA-4-silenced endothelial cells in vitro. Our findings help elucidate the role of PDIA-4 in endothelial autophagy and endothelial function and provide a potential target to modulate endothelial function and/or limit autophagy and EndMT in (patho-)physiological conditions.

Germline mutations in Breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and BRCA2) cause breast, ovarian, and other cancers, and the chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin (Dox) is widely used to treat these cancers. However, Dox use is limited by the latent induction of severe cardiotoxicity known as Dox-induced cardiomyopathy, for which there are no specific treatments currently available. Dox is administered into the systemic circulation, where it readily translocates into sub-cellular compartments and disrupts the integrity of DNA. Accumulating evidence indicates that oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammation, and apoptosis all play a central role in Dox-induced cardiomyopathy. The BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins are distinct as they perform crucial yet separate roles in the homologous recombination repair of DNA double-strand breaks, thereby maintaining genomic integrity. Additionally, both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mitigate oxidative stress and apoptosis in both cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells. Accordingly, BRCA1 and BRCA2 are essential regulators of pathways that are central to the development of cardiomyopathy induced by Doxorubicin. Despite extensive investigations, there exists a gap in knowledge about the role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy. Here, we review the previous findings and associations about the expected role and associated mechanisms of BRCA1 and 2 in Dox-induced cardiomyopathy and future perspectives.