Hye Seong

Prof. Hye Seong

Clinical Assistant Professor, Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 November 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YCYu Jung Choi
Yu Jung Choi
YSYu Bin Seo
Yu Bin Seo
JSJun-Won Seo
Jun-Won Seo
JLJacob Lee
Jacob Lee
ENEliel Nham
Eliel Nham
JSJoon Young Song
Joon Young Song
Antiviral treatment reduces the severity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, its effectiveness against long COVID-19 is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of antiviral drugs in preventing long COVID and related hospitalizations/deaths. Scientific and medical databases were searched from 1 January 2020 to 30 June 2023. We included observational cohort studies comparing individuals receiving early antiviral therapy for COVID-19 and those receiving supportive treatment. A fixed-effects model was used to merge the effects reported in two or more studies. The risk of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) was combined as an odds ratio (OR). Six studies were selected, including a total of 3,352,235 participants. The occurrence of PASC was 27.5% lower in patients who received antiviral drugs during the early stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR = 0.725; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.409–0.747) than in the supportive treatment group. Moreover, the risk of PASC-associated hospitalization and mortality was 29.7% lower in patients receiving early antiviral therapy than in the supportive treatment group (OR = 0.721; 95% CI = 0.697–0.794). Early antiviral therapy was associated with a reduced risk of PASC and related hospitalization or death. Thus, early antiviral therapy is recommended for at-risk individuals.

12 August 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJoon Young Song
Joon Young Song
JYJin Gu Yoon
Jin Gu Yoon
YSYu Bin Seo
Yu Bin Seo
JLJacob Lee
Jacob Lee
JEJoong-Sik Eom
Joong-Sik Eom
WKWoo Joo Kim
Woo Joo Kim
Although some intravenous drugs have been used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), no effective antiviral agents are currently available in the outpatient setting. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of 14-day ciclesonide treatment vs. standard care for patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. A randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial of ciclesonide inhalers was conducted in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Patients were enrolled within 3 days of diagnosis or within 7 days from symptom onset and randomly assigned to receive either ciclesonide (320 µg inhalation twice per day for 14 days) or standard care. The primary endpoint was the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) eradication rate on day 14 from study enrollment. Clinical status was assessed once daily, and serial nasopharyngeal viral load was evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. There were 35 and 26 patients in the ciclesonide and standard care groups, respectively. The SARS-CoV-2 eradication rate at day 14 was significantly higher in the ciclesonide group (p = 0.021). In multivariate analysis, SARS-CoV-2 negative conversion within 14 days was 12 times more likely in the ciclesonide group (95% confidence interval, 1.187–125.240). Additionally, the clinical failure rate (high-flow nasal oxygen therapy or mechanical ventilation) was significantly lower in the ciclesonide group (p = 0.034). In conclusion, ciclesonide inhalation shortened SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding duration, and it may inhibit the progression to acute respiratory failure in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04330586.

BPBoyoung Park
Boyoung Park
YCYunsu Choi
Yunsu Choi
JKJung Ho Kim
Jung Ho Kim
HSHye Seong
Hye Seong
YKYoun Jeong Kim
Youn Jeong Kim
BCBo Youl Choi
Bo Youl Choi
The mortality rate and causes of death among individuals diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in Korea were described and compared to those of the general population of Korea using a nationwide population-based claims database. We included 13,919 individuals aged 20–79 years newly diagnosed with HIV between 2004 and 2018. The patients’ vital status and cause of death were linked until 31 December 2019. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for all-cause death and specific causes of death were calculated. By the end of 2019, 1669 (12.0%) of the 13,919 HIV-infected participants had died. The survival probabilities of HIV-infected individuals at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years after diagnosis in Korea were 96.2%, 91.6%, 85.9%, and 79.6%, respectively. The main causes of death during the study period were acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS; 59.0%), non-AIDS-defining cancer (8.2%), suicide (7.4%), cardiovascular disease (4.9%), and liver disease (2.7%). The mortality rate of men and women infected with HIV was 5.60-fold (95% CI = 5.32–5.89) and 6.18-fold (95% CI = 5.30–7.09) that of men and women in the general population, respectively. After excluding deaths due to HIV, the mortality remained significantly higher, with an SMR of 2.16 (95% CI = 1.99–3.24) in men and 3.77 (95% CI = 3.06–4.48) in women. HIV-infected individuals had a higher overall mortality than the general population, with AIDS the leading cause of mortality. Additionally, mortality due to non-AIDS-related causes was higher in HIV-infected individuals.

4 August 2023 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HHHak-Jun Hyun
Hak-Jun Hyun
MCMin Joo Choi
Min Joo Choi
ENEliel Nham
Eliel Nham
HSHye Seong
Hye Seong
JYJin Gu Yoon
Jin Gu Yoon
JSJoon Young Song
Joon Young Song
Bivalent COVID-19 vaccines that contain BA.1 or BA.4/BA.5 have been introduced worldwide in response to pandemic waves of Omicron subvariants. This prospective cohort study was aimed to compare neutralizing antibodies (Nabs) against Omicron subvariants (BA.1, BA.5, BQ.1.1, BN.1, and XBB.1) before and 3–4 weeks after bivalent booster by the types of SARS-CoV-2 variants in prior infections and bivalent vaccine formulations. A total of 21 participants were included. Prior BA.1/BA.2-infected, and BA.5-infected participants showed significantly higher geometric mean titers of Nab compared to SARS-CoV-2-non-infected participants after bivalent booster (BA.1, 8156 vs. 4861 vs. 1636; BA.5, 6515 vs. 4861 vs. 915; BQ.1.1, 697 vs. 628 vs. 115; BN.1, 1402 vs. 1289 vs. 490; XBB.1, 434 vs. 355 vs. 144). When compared by bivalent vaccine formulations, Nab titers against studied subvariants after bivalent booster did not differ between BA.1 and BA.4/BA.5 bivalent vaccine (BA.1, 4886 vs. 5285; BA.5, 3320 vs. 4118; BQ.1.1, 311 vs. 572; BN.1, 1028 vs. 1095; XBB.1, 262 vs. 362). Both BA.1 and BA.4/BA.5 bivalent vaccines are immunogenic and provide enhanced neutralizing activities against Omicron subvariants. However, even after the bivalent booster, neutralizing activities against the later Omicron strains (BQ.1.1, BN.1, and XBB.1) would be insufficient to provide protection.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HSHye Seong
Hye Seong
JHJin-Wook Hong
Jin-Wook Hong
HHHak-Jun Hyun
Hak-Jun Hyun
JYJin Gu Yoon
Jin Gu Yoon
JNJi-Yun Noh
Ji-Yun Noh
JSJoon Young Song
Joon Young Song
Social distancing is an effective measure to mitigate the spread of novel viral infections in the absence of antiviral agents and insufficient vaccine supplies. Subway utilization density may reflect social activity and the degree of social distancing in the general population.; This study aimed to evaluate the correlations between subway use density and the activity of the influenza epidemic or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic using a time-series regression method. The subway use-based social distancing score (S-SDS) was calculated using the weekly ridership of 11 major subway stations. The temporal association of S-SDS with influenza-like illness (ILI) rates or the COVID-19 pandemic activity was analyzed using structural vector autoregressive modeling and the Granger causality (GC) test. During three influenza seasons (2017–2020), the time-series regression presented a significant causality from S-SDS to ILI (p = 0.0484). During the COVID-19 pandemic in January 2020, S-SDS had been suppressed at a level similar to or below the average of the previous four years. In contrast to the ILI rate, there was a negative correlation between COVID-19 activity and S-SDS. GC analysis revealed a negative causal relationship between COVID-19 and S-SDS (p = 0.0098).; S-SDS showed a significant time-series association with the ILI rate but not with COVID-19 activity. When public transportation use is sufficiently suppressed, additional social mobility restrictions are unlikely to significantly affect COVID-19 pandemic activity. It would be more important to strengthen universal mask-wearing and detailed public health measures focused on risk activities, particularly in enclosed spaces.

23 September 2022 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YCYu Jung Choi
Yu Jung Choi
JSJoon Young Song
Joon Young Song
HHHakjun Hyun
Hakjun Hyun
ENEliel Nham
Eliel Nham
JYJin Gu Yoon
Jin Gu Yoon
WKWoo Joo Kim
Woo Joo Kim
Although some studies have reported prognostic factors for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), they were conducted before standard treatment with remdesivir and dexamethasone was implemented. This retrospective, observational study was conducted to evaluate various prognostic factors in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia receiving standard treatment with remdesivir and dexamethasone. Of 99 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, 68 (68.7%) died within 30 days of hospitalization. The mean age was 71.3 years. Remdesivir and dexamethasone were administered to 80 (80.8%) and 84 (84.8%) patients, respectively. Early antibiotic treatment was administered to 70 patients (70.7%) within 5 days of hospitalization. Dexamethasone (79.4% vs 96.8%, P = .033) was more frequently administered in the survived group, whereas early antibiotics (60.3% vs 93.5%, P = .001) were less frequently administered. In the multivariate analysis, a high National Early Warning Score (NEWS; odds ratio [OR] 1.272), high Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; OR 1.441), and dyspnea (OR 4.033) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. There was no significant difference in age, sex, and vaccination doses between the survived and fatal groups. Lymphopenia, monocytopenia and high levels of C-reactive protein (CRP)/lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) reflected poor prognosis. NEWS, CCI, and dyspnea were predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Early antibiotic use did not lower the 30-day mortality risk.