The purpose of the present cross-sectional study was to examine the relationship between heart rate variability (HRV) and the range of cervical motion, disability, pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and quality of life in patients with chronic, non-specific neck pain. Thirty-five patients, aged 20–48 years, with chronic non-specific neck pain, completed validated questionnaires regarding neck pain intensity, pain-associated disability, catastrophic thoughts, and quality of life. The range of cervical motion was assessed using a digital goniometer. HRV indices were recorded in three positions (supine, sitting, and standing) through a smartphone application. Several significant correlations were observed between HRV indices and neck pain disability, the helplessness factor of catastrophizing, neck rotation, and quality of life. These correlations were only observed in the standing position. Pain catastrophizing was positively correlated with disability and pain intensity during active neck movement (Pearson r = 0.544, p < 0.01; Pearson r = 0.605, p < 0.01, respectively). Quality of life was negatively correlated with pain intensity during active movement (Pearson r = −0.347, p < 0.05). HRV indices were correlated with the psychological and physical domains of neck pain. These cardiac indices have been related to neck pain variables in some previous studies. Further research is needed to confirm this relationship in different daily conditions.

Chronic musculoskeletal pain negatively affects patients’ quality of life, and pain perceptions may significantly influence rehabilitation outcomes. This study investigated the relationships among pain intensity, pain perceptions, and kinesiophobia in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. No previous studies have examined these variables in combination. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 37 participants with non-specific chronic musculoskeletal pain for at least 6 months, affecting the neck (n = 8), lower back (n = 18), upper limbs (n = 5), lower limbs (n = 5), or shoulder (n = 1). The following validated tools were used: (a) Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory (PBPI), (b) the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), and (c) the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). Spearman r correlation analyses were performed. Total kinesiophobia scores were positively correlated with (a) total pain intensity (McGill score) (r = 0.37, p = 0.022), (b) present pain intensity (PPI) (r = 0.52, p = 0.001), (c) pain duration (r = 0.51, p = 0.001), (d) the “mystery” factor of pain perception (r = 0.41, p = 0.013), and (e) the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (r = 0.42, p = 0.009). The total pain perception scores were positively associated with the “fear of injury” factor of kinesiophobia (r = 0.36, p = 0.028). The McGill pain scores were strongly correlated with both PPI (r = 0.63, p = 0.001) and VAS (r = 0.51, p = 0.001). There is a significant relationship between pain perception and kinesiophobia levels in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Limitations of the study include a small and heterogeneous sample regarding pain localization. Further research is required using larger, more homogeneous populations to confirm the present findings.

Background/Objectives: Pes planus is characterized by loss of medial longitudinal foot arch, resulting potentially in dysfunction in balance. Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is related to sensorimotor control deficits. Both of these two musculoskeletal disorders have a diminishing effect on joint proprioception. The present study examined the impact of flatfoot on balance in individuals with CAI. Methods: A total of 28 students (15 men, 13 women; 18–23 years, M = 20.46, SD = 1.07) were assigned to CAI with pes planus (n = 15) or CAI only (n = 13). Balance was assessed using the Y-balance test (YBT) and modified star excursion balance test (mSEBT) in three directions (anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral), alongside the Cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT). Group differences were analyzed with independent t tests or Mann–Whitney U tests (α = 0.05). Results: The findings of the study did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups in the balance variable [mSEBT/anterior left foot (t = 0.239, p = 0.865); mSEBT/posteromedial left foot (t = −0.048, p = 0.562); mSEBT/posterolateral left foot (t = 0.164, p = 0.258); mSEBT/anterior right foot (t = −0.433, p = 0.748); mSEBT/posteromedial right foot (t = 0.745, p = 0.606); mSEBT/posterolateral right foot (t = 0.263, p = 0.680); YBT/anterior left foot (U = 96.00, p = 0.93); YBT/posteromedial left foot (U = 94.50, p = 0.87); YBT/posterolateral left foot (U = 96.00, p = 0.93); YBT/anterior right foot (U = 95.50, p = 0.92); YBT/posterolateral right foot (U = 82.50, p = 0.45)]. However, a trend towards significance was found as patients with flatfeet had a weaker performance in balance tests [posteromedial direction of the YBT for the right foot (U = 70.00, p = 0.12)]. Conclusions: Although pes planus did not seem to affect the balance ability of individuals with CAI, future studies should confirm the relationship of pes planus and CAI with a larger group, including variables such as ankle range of motion, muscle strength, and functional activity level. A better understanding of the above relationship may lead to more precise diagnostic processes and more efficient therapies in CAI.