Background: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was: (i) to examine the association between wine consumption and cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and coronary heart disease (CHD) and (ii) to analyse whether this association could be influenced by personal and study factors, including the participants’ mean age, the percentage of female subjects, follow-up time and percentage of current smokers. Methods: In order to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched several databases for longitudinal studies from their inception to March 2023. This study was previously registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021293568). Results: This systematic review included 25 studies, of which the meta-analysis included 22 studies. The pooled RR for the association of wine consumption and the risk of CHD using the DerSimonian and Laird approach was 0.76 (95% CIs: 0.69, 0.84), for the risk of CVD was 0.83 (95% CIs: 0.70, 0.98), and for the risk of cardiovascular mortality was 0.73 (95% CIs: 0.59, 0.90). Conclusions: This research revealed that wine consumption has an inverse relationship to cardiovascular mortality, CVD, and CHD. Age, the proportion of women in the samples, and follow-up time did not influence this association. Interpreting these findings with prudence was necessary because increasing wine intake might be harmful to individuals who are vulnerable to alcohol because of age, medication, or their pathologies.

Background: The concept of early vascular aging (EVA) represents a potentially beneficial model for future research into the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the early manifestations of cardiovascular disease. For this reason, the aims of this study were to verify by confirmatory factor analysis the concept of EVA on a single factor based on vascular, clinical and biochemical parameters in a healthy adult population and to develop a statistical model to estimate the EVA index from variables collected in a dataset to classify patients into different cardiovascular risk groups: healthy vascular aging (HVA) and EVA. Methods: The EVasCu study, a cross-sectional study, was based on data obtained from 390 healthy adults. To examine the construct validity of a single-factor model to measure accelerated vascular aging, different models including vascular, clinical and biochemical parameters were examined. In addition, unsupervised clustering techniques (using both K-means and hierarchical methods) were used to identify groups of patients sharing similar characteristics in terms of the analysed variables to classify patients into different cardiovascular risk groups: HVA and EVA. Results: Our data show that a single-factor model including pulse pressure, glycated hemoglobin A1c, pulse wave velocity and advanced glycation end products shows the best construct validity for the EVA index. The optimal value of the risk groups to separate patients is K = 2 (HVA and EVA). Conclusions: The EVA index proved to be an adequate model to classify patients into different cardiovascular risk groups, which could be valuable in guiding future preventive and therapeutic interventions.

This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of risdiplam on motor and respiratory function in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). We systematically searched Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to March 2023. We included pre‐post studies that determined the effect of risdiplam on the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP‐INTEND), the 32‐item Motor Function Measure (MFM32), the Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM), the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale – Expanded (HFMSE), respiratory function, and the proportion of risdiplam‐related adverse events in a population with SMA (phenotypes 1 and 2/3). Meta‐analyses were also performed where possible. Eleven studies were included. After 12 months of treatment, 57% of participants with SMA1 achieved a CHOP‐INTEND score ≥ 40 points, and more than half were able to feed orally and had head control. In SMA2/3, MFM32, RULM, and HFMSE increased by 2.09 (1.17, 3.01), 1.73 (1.25, 2.20), and 1.00 (0.40, 1.59) points, respectively. Efficacy on respiratory function in SMA2/3 was inconsistent. Finally, 16% of participants experienced adverse events, but serious adverse events could not be quantified due to a lack of cases. The limited available evidence suggests that risdiplam is an effective and safe drug for the treatment of SMA. In addition, long‐term clinical benefit may be partly determined by the stage of disease at which treatment is initiated.

One of the latest approved therapies for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is onasemnogene abeparvovec, which transduces motor neurons with the survival of motor neuron gene. The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the effect of onasemnogene abeparvovec on motor function in participants with type 1 SMA. Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from inception to August 2022. Pre-post clinical trials and observational studies determining the effect of onasemnogene abeparvovec on the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND) score or motor milestones (i.e., head control, sit unassisted, feed orally, not use permanent ventilatory support, crawl, stand alone and walk alone) in participants with type 1 SMA were included. Continuous outcomes (i.e., CHOP-INTEND score) were expressed as pre-post mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI), while the proportion of participants who achieved >40, >50, and >58/60 points on the CHOP-INTEND and the achievement of the motor milestones were expressed as proportions and 95% CI. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted on each outcome, and the baseline CHOP-INTEND score was considered a covariate. Eleven studies were included in the systematic review, and four were included in the meta-analyses. Onasemnogene abeparvovec improved CHOP-INTEND scores by 11.06 (9.47, 12.65) and 14.14 (12.42, 15.86) points at 3 and 6 months postinfusion, respectively. Moreover, 87%, 51%, and 12% achieved CHOP-INTEND scores of >40, >50, and >58/60 points, respectively. However, this proportion increased to 100% in presymptomatic participants with greater baseline CHOP-INTEND. Motor milestones were also improved, especially in presymptomatic participants. Our systematic review not only showed a marked improvement in motor function in type 1 SMA but also showed that treatment in the presymptomatic stage improves the development of these children towards an evolution close to normal for their age.

Heart failure (HF) is associated with a deficiency in blood levels of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), and its supplementation has been proposed. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the available evidence on the effects of CoQ10 on cardiac function and quality of life in HF. A systematic search of Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception until March 2023. Meta-analyses measuring the effect of CoQ10 on cardiac function [i.e., ejection fraction (EF), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume (SV)], quality of life [i.e., mortality, exercise capacity, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification], and CoQ10 levels in HF were included. Ten meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. CoQ10 had an effect on EF in 6 of the 9 studies, with an increase of 1.77% (0.10, 3.44) to 3.81% (1.22, 6.40), while it had an effect on CO, CI and SV in one of the two studies. Moreover, CoQ10 did not improve exercise capacity and only one study showed an effect on NYHA classification, while there was a risk ratio (RR) of 0.69 (0.50, 0.95) to 0.58 (0.35, 0.95) in favour of CoQ10 for mortality and a RR of 0.62 (0.49, 0.78) for hospitalisations. Finally, CoQ10 levels were found to increase by 1.40 μg mL⁻¹ in all studies. CoQ10 showed a possible beneficial effect on heart function, which was associated with a reduction in mortality and hospitalisations. However, more research is needed into the conditions that may optimise CoQ10 therapy.