Ivan Perasović

Mr. Ivan Perasović


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ivan PerasovićIvan Perasović
Ivan Perasović
AIAntonela Karmen Ivišić
Antonela Karmen Ivišić
DVDario Vrdoljak
Dario Vrdoljak
Nikola ForeticNikola Foretic
Nikola Foretic
VPVladimir Pavlinović
Vladimir Pavlinović
ZNZoran Nikolovski
Zoran Nikolovski
Background: This study investigates the psychophysiological stress profiles of professional basketball players by simultaneously analyzing two distinct neuroendocrine pathways: the sympathetic–adrenal–medullary (SAM) system, via salivary alpha-amylase (AA), and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, via salivary cortisol (C). While competitive environments are known to elicit significant stress, the interaction between game-specific variables—such as playing time (PT) and tactical position—and those biomarkers remains insufficiently explored in real-time, official match settings. Methods: Twelve professional male basketball players were monitored across four official matches. Salivary samples were collected, and stress biomarkers (AA and C) were analyzed at three timepoints: pre-match, half-time, and post-match. Results: Results indicate that stress responses are non-uniform and highly context-dependent. A significant spike in AA was observed during the first match (p < 0.001; ES = 0.82; 95% CI −0.01–1.66), where concentrations rose from a pre-match mean of 247.9 ± 232.59 U/mL to a post-match peak of 674.39 ± 693.33 U/mL. Cortisol responses did not vary significantly across matches but exhibited a strong positive correlation with PT (p = 0.01; R = 0.76), identifying that C may serve as a primary marker of individual physical workload. Positional analysis revealed significant divergence in HPA activation; guards (0.55 ± 0.31 µg/dL) and centers (0.51 ± 0.22 µg/dL) exhibited higher cortisol levels compared to forwards (0.24 ± 0.18 µg/dL), reflecting the high cognitive/decision-making load of guards and the mechanical/physical contact load of centers. Conclusions: The observed differences in AA and C liberation suggest that stress responses during matches are influenced by a complex interaction of physiological and psychological stimuli characteristic of competitive basketball. Consequently, these findings indicate the importance and value of a dual-biomarker approach which might provide a framework for optimized training load management and recovery protocols in elite basketball.