José Guadalupe Ávalos

Dr. José Guadalupe Ávalos

Forest Ecology
+2
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 October 2015 in Nature Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BGBárbara Goettsch
Bárbara Goettsch
CHCraig Hilton-Taylor
Craig Hilton-Taylor
GCGabriela Cruz-Piñón
Gabriela Cruz-Piñón
JDJames P. Duffy
James P. Duffy
AFAnne Frances
Anne Frances
KGKevin J. Gaston
Kevin J. Gaston

1 January 2016 in Journal of Arid Environments
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ICIsrael G. Carrillo-Angeles
Israel G. Carrillo-Angeles
HSHumberto Suzán-Azpiri
Humberto Suzán-Azpiri
MMMaría C. Mandujano
María C. Mandujano
JGJordan Golubov
Jordan Golubov
José Guadalupe ÁvalosJosé Guadalupe Ávalos
José Guadalupe Ávalos

18 June 2020 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GGGisel Garza
Gisel Garza
ARArmida Rivera
Armida Rivera
CVCrystian Sadiel Sadiel Venegas-Barrera
Crystian Sadiel Sadiel Venegas-Barrera
José Guadalupe ÁvalosJosé Guadalupe Ávalos
José Guadalupe Ávalos
JDJon Dale
Jon Dale
Teresa Patricia Feria ArroyoTeresa Patricia Feria Arroyo
Teresa Patricia Feria Arroyo
Walker’s Manihot, Manihot walkerae, is an endangered plant that is endemic to the Tamaulipan thornscrub ecoregion of extreme southern Texas and northeastern Mexico. M. walkerae populations are highly fragmented and are found on both protected public lands and private property. Habitat loss and competition by invasive species are the most detrimental threats for M. walkerae; however, the effect of climate change on M. walkerae’s geographic distribution remains unexplored and could result in further range restrictions. Our objectives are to evaluate the potential effects of climate change on the distribution of M. walkerae and assess the usefulness of natural protected areas in future conservation. We predict current and future geographic distribution for M. walkerae (years 2050 and 2070) using three different general circulation models (CM3, CMIP5, and HADGEM) and two climate change scenarios (RCP 4.5 and 8.5). A total of nineteen spatially rarefied occurrences for M. walkerae and ten non-highly correlated bioclimatic variables were inputted to the maximum entropy algorithm (MaxEnt) to produce twenty replicates per scenario. The area under the curve (AUC) value for the consensus model was higher than 0.90 and the partial ROC value was higher than 1.80, indicating a high predictive ability. The potential reduction in geographic distribution for M. walkerae by the effect of climate change was variable throughout the models, but collectively they predict a restriction in distribution. The most severe reductions were 9% for the year 2050 with the CM3 model at an 8.5 RCP, and 14% for the year 2070 with the CMIP5 model at the 4.5 RCP. The future geographic distribution of M. walkerae was overlapped with protected lands in the U.S. and Mexico in order to identify areas that could be suitable for future conservation efforts. In the U.S. there are several protected areas that are potentially suitable for M. walkerae, whereas in Mexico no protected areas exist within M. walkerae suitable habitat.

1 September 2005 in Biodiversity and Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
José Guadalupe ÁvalosJosé Guadalupe Ávalos
José Guadalupe Ávalos
EJEnrique Jurado
Enrique Jurado


1 June 2017 in Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EREdilia de la Rosa-Manzano
Edilia de la Rosa-Manzano
AGAntonio Guerra-Pérez
Antonio Guerra-Pérez
GMGlenda Mendieta-Leiva
Glenda Mendieta-Leiva
AMArturo Mora-Olivo
Arturo Mora-Olivo
José Guadalupe ÁvalosJosé Guadalupe Ávalos
José Guadalupe Ávalos
LALeonardo U. Arellano-Méndez
Leonardo U. Arellano-Méndez
We assessed the diversity, vertical distribution, and the effect of structural and geographical factors on the diversity of vascular epiphyte assemblages (VEAs) in two forest types in the “El Cielo” Biosphere Reserve. We found 2839 epiphyte individuals from 15 species on 240 host trees (27 species) in the semideciduous forest and 5085 individuals from 8 species on 215 host trees (12 species) in the pine–oak forest. Epiphytes showed a preference for the middle zone of the host trees. The diversity of VEAs was uneven in both forest types, although the VEA in the semideciduous forest was the most diverse. VEAs across forests were slightly similar in their composition (30% mean overlap), but very different in their structure (i.e., they did not share very abundant species). The variation in species richness among VEAs was influenced by forest structure, independently of forest type. Compositional differences of VEAs among forest types were explained by geographic distance and host-tree identity (31% and 28% variation explained, respectively). By characterizing the diversity of VEAs we provide a basic understanding of the factors influencing epiphyte diversity in these understudied ecosystems.