JAINIL RAJENDRA KAKKA

Mr. JAINIL RAJENDRA KAKKA


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANAlexander Neulinger
Alexander Neulinger
LSLukas Sparer
Lukas Sparer
MRMaryam Roshanaei
Maryam Roshanaei
Dragutin OstojićDragutin Ostojić
Dragutin Ostojić
JKJAINIL RAJENDRA KAKKA
JAINIL RAJENDRA KAKKA
DRDušan Ramljak
Dušan Ramljak
Artificial intelligence (AI) agents are increasingly shaping vital sectors of society, including healthcare, education, supply chains, and finance. As their influence grows, AI alignment research plays a pivotal role in ensuring these systems are trustworthy, transparent, and aligned with human values. Leveraging blockchain technology, proven over the past decade in enabling transparent, tamper-resistant distributed systems, offers significant potential to strengthen AI alignment. However, despite its potential, the current AI alignment literature has yet to systematically explore the effectiveness of blockchain in facilitating secure and ethical behavior in AI agents. While existing systematic literature reviews (SLRs) in AI alignment address various aspects of AI safety and AI alignment, this SLR specifically examines the gap at the intersection of AI alignment, blockchain, and ethics. To address this gap, this SLR explores how blockchain technology can overcome the limitations of existing AI alignment approaches. We searched for studies containing keywords from AI, blockchain, and ethics domains in the Scopus database, identifying 7110 initial records on 28 May 2024. We excluded studies which did not answer our research questions and did not discuss the thematic intersection between AI, blockchain, and ethics to a sufficient extent. The quality of the selected studies was assessed on the basis of their methodology, clarity, completeness, and transparency, resulting in a final number of 46 included studies, the majority of which were journal articles. Results were synthesized through quantitative topic analysis and qualitative analysis to identify key themes and patterns. The contributions of this paper include the following: (i) presentation of the results of an SLR conducted to identify, extract, evaluate, and synthesize studies on the symbiosis of AI alignment, blockchain, and ethics; (ii) summary and categorization of the existing benefits and challenges in incorporating blockchain for AI alignment within the context of ethics; (iii) development of a framework that will facilitate new research activities; and (iv) establishment of the state of evidence with in-depth assessment. The proposed blockchain-based AI alignment framework in this study demonstrates that integrating blockchain with AI alignment can substantially enhance robustness, promote public trust, and facilitate ethical compliance in AI systems.

24 January 2025 in Symmetry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dragutin OstojićDragutin Ostojić
Dragutin Ostojić
DRDušan Ramljak
Dušan Ramljak
AUAndrija Urošević
Andrija Urošević
MJMarija Jolović
Marija Jolović
RDRadovan Dušan Drašković
Radovan Dušan Drašković
TDTatjana Davidović
Tatjana Davidović
In the era of open data and open science, it is important that, before announcing their new results, authors consider all previous studies and ensure that they have competitive material worth publishing. To save time, it is popular to replace the exhaustive search of online databases with the utilization of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI). However, especially for problems in niche domains, generative AI results may not be precise enough and sometimes can even be misleading. A typical example is P||Cmax, an important scheduling problem studied mainly in a wider context of parallel machine scheduling. As there is an uncovered symmetry between P||Cmax and other similar optimization problems, it is not easy for generative AI tools to include all relevant results into search. Therefore, to provide the necessary background data to support researchers and generative AI learning, we critically discuss comparisons between algorithms for P||Cmax that have been presented in the literature. Thus, we summarize and categorize the “state-of-the-art” methods, benchmark test instances, and compare methodologies, all over a long time period. We aim to establish a framework for fair performance evaluation of algorithms for P||Cmax, and according to the presented systematic literature review, we uncovered that it does not exist. We believe that this framework could be of wider importance, as the identified principles apply to a plethora of combinatorial optimization problems.