Jennie Louise Ponsford

Prof. Jennie Louise Ponsford

Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 May 2023 in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSNoah D. Silverberg
Noah D. Silverberg
GIGrant L Iverson
Grant L Iverson
ACAlison Cogan
Alison Cogan
KDKristen Dams-O-Connor
Kristen Dams-O-Connor
RDRichard Delmonico
Richard Delmonico
RZRoger Zemek
Roger Zemek

1 July 2000 in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJennie Louise Ponsford
Jennie Louise Ponsford
CWCatherine Willmott
Catherine Willmott
ARAndrew Rothwell
Andrew Rothwell
PCPeter Cameron
Peter Cameron
AKAnn-Maree Kelly
Ann-Maree Kelly
KNKim Ng
Kim Ng
This study aimed to investigate outcome in adults with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) at 1 week and 3 months postinjury and to identify factors associated with persisting problems. A total of 84 adults with mild TBI were compared with 53 adults with other minor injuries as controls in terms of postconcussional symptomatology, behavior, and cognitive performance at 1 week and 3 months postinjury. At 1 week postinjury, adults with mild TBI were reporting symptoms, particularly headaches, dizziness, fatigue, visual disturbance, and memory difficulties. They exhibited slowing of information processing on neuropsychological measures, namely the WAIS–R Digit Symbol subtest and the Speed of Comprehension Test. By 3 months postinjury, the symptoms reported at 1 week had largely resolved, and no impairments were evident on neuropsychological measures. However, there was a subgroup of 24% of participants who were still suffering many symptoms, who were highly distressed, and whose lives were still significantly disrupted. These individuals did not have longer posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) duration. They were more likely to have a history of previous head injury, neurological or psychiatric problems, to be students, females, and to have been injured in a motor vehicle accident. The majority were showing significant levels of psychopathology. A range of factors, other than those directly reflecting the severity of injury, appear to be associated with outcome following mild TBI. (JINS, 2000, 6, 568–579.)

1 January 2012 in Neuropsychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJennie Louise Ponsford
Jennie Louise Ponsford
PCPeter Cameron
Peter Cameron
MFMark Fitzgerald
Mark Fitzgerald
MGMichele Grant
Michele Grant
AMAntonina Mikocka-Walus
Antonina Mikocka-Walus
MSMichael Schönberger
Michael Schönberger
There is continuing controversy regarding predictors of poor outcome following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). This study aimed to prospectively examine the influence of preinjury factors, injury-related factors, and postinjury factors on outcome following mTBI. Participants were 123 patients with mTBI and 100 trauma patient controls recruited and assessed in the emergency department and followed up 1 week and 3 months postinjury. Outcome was measured in terms of reported postconcussional symptoms. Measures included the ImPACT Post-Concussional Symptom Scale and cognitive concussion battery, including Attention, Verbal and Visual memory, Processing Speed and Reaction Time modules, pre- and postinjury SF-36 and MINI Psychiatric status ratings, VAS Pain Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, PTSD Checklist-Specific, and Revised Social Readjustment Scale. Presence of mTBI predicted postconcussional symptoms 1 week postinjury, along with being female and premorbid psychiatric history, with elevated HADS anxiety a concurrent indicator. However, at 3 months, preinjury physical or psychiatric problems but not mTBI most strongly predicted continuing symptoms, with concurrent indicators including HADS anxiety, PTSD symptoms, other life stressors and pain. HADS anxiety and age predicted 3-month PCS in the mTBI group, whereas PTSD symptoms and other life stressors were most significant for the controls. Cognitive measures were not predictive of PCS at 1 week or 3 months. Given the evident influence of both premorbid and concurrent psychiatric problems, especially anxiety, on postinjury symptoms, managing the anxiety response in vulnerable individuals with mTBI may be important to minimize ongoing sequelae.

1 December 2001 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJennie Louise Ponsford
Jennie Louise Ponsford
CWCatherine Willmott
Catherine Willmott
ARAndrew Rothwell
Andrew Rothwell
PCPeter Cameron
Peter Cameron
GAGary Ayton
Gary Ayton
KNKim Ng
Kim Ng
Objectives. The impact of mild head injury or mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) in children is variable, and determinants of outcome remain poorly understood. There have been no previous attempts to evaluate the impact of interventions to improve outcome. Results of previous intervention studies in adults have been mixed. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of providing information on outcome measured in terms of reported symptoms, cognitive performance, and psychological adjustment in children 3 months after injury. Methods. A total of 61 children with mild TBI were assessed 1 week and 3 months after injury, and 58 children with mild TBI were assessed 3 months after injury only. They were compared with 2 control groups (N = 45 and 47) of children with minor injuries not involving the head. Participants completed measures of preinjury behavior and psychological adjustment, postconcussion symptoms, and tests of attention, speed of information processing, and memory. Children with mild TBI seen at 1 week were also given an information booklet outlining symptoms associated with mild TBI and suggested coping strategies. Those seen 3 months after injury only did not receive this booklet. Results. Children with mild TBI reported more symptoms than controls at 1 week but demonstrated no impairment on neuropsychological measures. Initial symptoms had resolved for most children by 3 months after injury, but a small group of children who had previous head injury or a history of learning or behavioral difficulties reported ongoing problems. The group not seen at 1 week and not given the information booklet reported more symptoms overall and was more stressed 3 months after injury. Conclusions. Providing an information booklet reduces anxiety and thereby lowers the incidence of ongoing problems.

1 June 2011 in Journal of Neurotrauma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJennie Louise Ponsford
Jennie Louise Ponsford
PCPeter Cameron
Peter Cameron
MFMark Fitzgerald
Mark Fitzgerald
MGMichele Grant
Michele Grant
AMAntonina Mikocka-Walus
Antonina Mikocka-Walus
The question as to whether mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) results in persisting sequelae over and above those experienced by individuals sustaining general trauma remains controversial. This prospective study aimed to document outcomes 1 week and 3 months post-injury following mTBI assessed in the emergency department (ED) of a major adult trauma center. One hundred and twenty-three patients presenting with uncomplicated mTBI and 100 matched trauma controls completed measures of post-concussive symptoms and cognitive performance (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing battery; ImPACT) and pre-injury health-related quality of life (SF-36) in the ED. These measures together with measures of psychiatric status (the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview [MINI]) pre- and post-injury, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Visual Analogue Scale for Pain, Functional Assessment Questionnaire, and PTSD Checklist-Specific, were re-administered at follow-up. Participants with mTBI showed significantly more severe post-concussive symptoms in the ED and at 1 week post-injury. They performed more poorly than controls on the Visual Memory subtest of the ImPACT at 1 week and 3 months post-injury. Both the mTBI and control groups recovered well physically, and most were employed 3 months post-injury. There were no significant group differences in psychiatric function. However, the group with mild TBI was more likely to report ongoing memory and concentration problems in daily activities. Further investigation of factors associated with these ongoing problems is warranted.

1 May 2012 in Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJennie Louise Ponsford
Jennie Louise Ponsford
CZCarlo Ziino
Carlo Ziino
DPDiane L. Parcell
Diane L. Parcell
JSJulia A. Shekleton
Julia A. Shekleton
MRMonique Roper
Monique Roper
Shantha RajaratnamShantha Rajaratnam
Shantha Rajaratnam
Although fatigue and sleep disturbance are commonly reported following traumatic brain injury (TBI), understanding of their nature and treatment remains limited. This article reviews a series of investigations of the nature and causes of fatigue and sleep disturbance following TBI. A large cohort of community-based patients with TBI, recruited from a TBI rehabilitation program, completed measures of subjective fatigue and sleep disturbances, as well as attentional measures. A subgroup of participants completed polysomnography and assessment of dim light melatonin onset. Fatigue and sleep disturbance are common. Both are associated with anxiety, depression, and pain. However, fatigue is also associated with slowed information processing and the need for increased effort in performing tasks. Sleep disturbances contribute to fatigue. Objective sleep studies show reduced sleep efficiency, increased sleep onset latency, and increased time awake after sleep onset. Depression and pain exacerbate but cannot entirely account for these problems. There is increased slow-wave sleep. Individuals with TBI show lower levels of evening melatonin production, associated with less rapid-eye movement sleep. These findings suggest potential treatments including cognitive behavior therapy supporting lifestyle modifications, pharmacologic treatments with modafinil and melatonin, and light therapy to enhance alertness, vigilance, and mood. Controlled trials of these interventions are needed.