Jiquan Chen

Dr. Jiquan Chen

Michigan State University, United States
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 October 2010 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMartin Jung
Martin Jung
MRMarkus Reichstein
Markus Reichstein
PCPhilippe Ciais
Philippe Ciais
SSSonia I. Seneviratne
Sonia I. Seneviratne
JSJustin Sheffield
Justin Sheffield
KZKe Zhang
Ke Zhang
More than half of the solar energy absorbed by land surfaces is currently used to evaporate water1. Climate change is expected to intensify the hydrological cycle2 and to alter evapotranspiration, with implications for ecosystem services and feedback to regional and global climate. Evapotranspiration changes may already be under way, but direct observational constraints are lacking at the global scale. Until such evidence is available, changes in the water cycle on land—a key diagnostic criterion of the effects of climate change and variability—remain uncertain. Here we provide a data-driven estimate of global land evapotranspiration from 1982 to 2008, compiled using a global monitoring network3, meteorological and remote-sensing observations, and a machine-learning algorithm4. In addition, we have assessed evapotranspiration variations over the same time period using an ensemble of process-based land-surface models. Our results suggest that global annual evapotranspiration increased on average by 7.1 ± 1.0 millimetres per year per decade from 1982 to 1997. After that, coincident with the last major El Niño event in 1998, the global evapotranspiration increase seems to have ceased until 2008. This change was driven primarily by moisture limitation in the Southern Hemisphere, particularly Africa and Australia. In these regions, microwave satellite observations indicate that soil moisture decreased from 1998 to 2008. Hence, increasing soil-moisture limitations on evapotranspiration largely explain the recent decline of the global land-evapotranspiration trend. Whether the changing behaviour of evapotranspiration is representative of natural climate variability or reflects a more permanent reorganization of the land water cycle is a key question for earth system science.

9 July 2020 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GPGilberto Pastorello
Gilberto Pastorello
CTCarlo Trotta
Carlo Trotta
ECEleonora Canfora
Eleonora Canfora
HCHousen Chu
Housen Chu
DCDanielle Christianson
Danielle Christianson
DPDario Papale
Dario Papale
The FLUXNET2015 dataset provides ecosystem-scale data on CO2, water, and energy exchange between the biosphere and the atmosphere, and other meteorological and biological measurements, from 212 sites around the globe (over 1500 site-years, up to and including year 2014). These sites, independently managed and operated, voluntarily contributed their data to create global datasets. Data were quality controlled and processed using uniform methods, to improve consistency and intercomparability across sites. The dataset is already being used in a number of applications, including ecophysiology studies, remote sensing studies, and development of ecosystem and Earth system models. FLUXNET2015 includes derived-data products, such as gap-filled time series, ecosystem respiration and photosynthetic uptake estimates, estimation of uncertainties, and metadata about the measurements, presented for the first time in this paper. In addition, 206 of these sites are for the first time distributed under a Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0) license. This paper details this enhanced dataset and the processing methods, now made available as open-source codes, making the dataset more accessible, transparent, and reproducible.

1 January 2002 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JFJerry F Franklin
Jerry F Franklin
TSThomas A Spies
Thomas A Spies
RPRobert Van Pelt
Robert Van Pelt
ACAndrew B Carey
Andrew B Carey
DTDale A Thornburgh
Dale A Thornburgh
Jiquan ChenJiquan Chen
Jiquan Chen

22 November 2016 in Ecological Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YFYi Fan
Yi Fan
Jiquan ChenJiquan Chen
Jiquan Chen
GSGabriela Shirkey
Gabriela Shirkey
RJRanjeet John
Ranjeet John
SWSusie R. Wu
Susie R. Wu
CSChangliang Shao
Changliang Shao
This review was developed to introduce the essential components and variants of structural equation modeling (SEM), synthesize the common issues in SEM applications, and share our views on SEM’s future in ecological research. We searched the Web of Science on SEM applications in ecological studies from 1999 through 2016 and summarized the potential of SEMs, with a special focus on unexplored uses in ecology. We also analyzed and discussed the common issues with SEM applications in previous publications and presented our view for its future applications. We searched and found 146 relevant publications on SEM applications in ecological studies. We found that five SEM variants had not commenly been applied in ecology, including the latent growth curve model, Bayesian SEM, partial least square SEM, hierarchical SEM, and variable/model selection. We identified ten common issues in SEM applications including strength of causal assumption, specification of feedback loops, selection of models and variables, identification of models, methods of estimation, explanation of latent variables, selection of fit indices, report of results, estimation of sample size, and the fit of model. In previous ecological studies, measurements of latent variables, explanations of model parameters, and reports of key statistics were commonly overlooked, while several advanced uses of SEM had been ignored overall. With the increasing availability of data, the use of SEM holds immense potential for ecologists in the future.

3 September 2011 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMartin Jung
Martin Jung
MRMarkus Reichstein
Markus Reichstein
HMHank A. Margolis
Hank A. Margolis
ACAlessandro Cescatti
Alessandro Cescatti
ARAndrew D. Richardson
Andrew D. Richardson
CWChristopher Williams
Christopher Williams
[1] We upscaled FLUXNET observations of carbon dioxide, water, and energy fluxes to the global scale using the machine learning technique, model tree ensembles (MTE). We trained MTE to predict site‐level gross primary productivity (GPP), terrestrial ecosystem respiration (TER), net ecosystem exchange (NEE), latent energy (LE), and sensible heat (H) based on remote sensing indices, climate and meteorological data, and information on land use. We applied the trained MTEs to generate global flux fields at a 0.5° × 0.5° spatial resolution and a monthly temporal resolution from 1982 to 2008. Cross‐validation analyses revealed good performance of MTE in predicting among‐site flux variability with modeling efficiencies (MEf) between 0.64 and 0.84, except for NEE (MEf = 0.32). Performance was also good for predicting seasonal patterns (MEf between 0.84 and 0.89, except for NEE (0.64)). By comparison, predictions of monthly anomalies were not as strong (MEf between 0.29 and 0.52). Improved accounting of disturbance and lagged environmental effects, along with improved characterization of errors in the training data set, would contribute most to further reducing uncertainties. Our global estimates of LE (158 ± 7 J × 1018 yr−1), H (164 ± 15 J × 1018 yr−1), and GPP (119 ± 6 Pg C yr−1) were similar to independent estimates. Our global TER estimate (96 ± 6 Pg C yr−1) was likely underestimated by 5–10%. Hot spot regions of interannual variability in carbon fluxes occurred in semiarid to semihumid regions and were controlled by moisture supply. Overall, GPP was more important to interannual variability in NEE than TER. Our empirically derived fluxes may be used for calibration and evaluation of land surface process models and for exploratory and diagnostic assessments of the biosphere.

7 June 2005 in Conservation Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KHKaren A. Harper
Karen A. Harper
SMS. Ellen Macdonald
S. Ellen Macdonald
PBPhilip J. Burton
Philip J. Burton
Jiquan ChenJiquan Chen
Jiquan Chen
KBKimberley D. Brosofske
Kimberley D. Brosofske
PEPer‐Anders Esseen
Per‐Anders Esseen