João Pinto

Prof. João Pinto

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2020 in Journal of Corporate Finance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMManuel O. Marques
Manuel O. Marques
JPJoão Pinto
João Pinto

5 December 2019 in The European Journal of Finance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JPJoão Pinto
João Pinto
Mário Coutinho dos SantosMário Coutinho dos Santos
Mário Coutinho dos Santos
We examine the factors that influence nonfinancial firms’ choice of issuing standard corporate bonds vis-à-vis contracting structured finance, in the form of project finance or asset securitization arrangements. Using a data set of deals closed by 4,700 European borrowers between 2000 and 2016, we find that informational frictions and issuance costs affect public firms’ borrowing source choices. Findings suggest that borrowers choose structured finance when they are relatively smaller, less profitable, have lower asset tangibility, and seek long-term financing. Our findings also document that borrowers resorting to asset securitization tend to have larger growth opportunity sets. Borrowers resorting to project finance are less creditworthy than corporate bond issuers and, on average, asset securitization deals have an 87.6 basis points borrowing cost advantage over corporate bond deals for switchers.

4 March 2016 in Investment Management and Financial Innovations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JPJoão Pinto
João Pinto
PAPaulo Alves
Paulo Alves
This paper surveys the literature examining securitization. Besides describing the economic motivation for the use of securitization, the paper provides details on securitization characteristics and players, presents the recent trends of securitization markets, describes the role played by securitization in the 2007-2008 financial crisis, and compares the financial characteristics of securitization transactions for a large cross-section of ABS, MBS and CDO tranches issued during the 2000-2011 period. Securitization creates value by increasing liquidity, reducing the cost of funding, allowing originators to diversify funding sources, improving originators’ risk management, and allowing originators to benefit from regulatory arbitrage and to improve key financial ratios. However, securitization transactions are complex undertakings, they are expensive to set up, and increase the deadweight transaction costs associated with principal-agent and asymmetric information problems when used inappropriately

1 January 2021 in Finance Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJoão Pinto
João Pinto
CSCátia S. Silva
Cátia S. Silva

8 May 2017 in Investment Management and Financial Innovations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJoão Pinto
João Pinto
Project finance is the process of financing a specific economic unit that the sponsors create, in which creditors share much of the venture’s business risk and funding is obtained strictly for the project itself. Project finance creates value by reducing the costs of funding, maintaining the sponsors financial flexibility, increasing the leverage ratios, avoiding contamination risk, reducing corporate taxes, improving risk management, and reducing the costs associated with market imperfections. However, project finance transactions are complex undertakings, they have higher costs of borrowing when compared to conventional financing and the negotiation of the financing and operating agreements is time-consuming. In addition to describing the economic motivation for the use of project finance, this paper provides details on project finance characteristics and players, presents the recent trends of the project finance market and provides some statistics in relation to project finance lending activity between 2000 and 2014. Statistical analysis shows that project finance loans arranged for U.S. borrowers have higher credit spreads and upfront fees, and have higher loan size to deal size ratios when compared with loans arranged for borrowers located in W.E. On the contrary, loans closed in the U.S. have a much shorter average maturity and are much less likely to be subject to currency risk and to be closed as term loans.

18 June 2022 in European Financial Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMafalda C. Correia
Mafalda C. Correia
JPJoão Pinto
João Pinto