Johan Davidsson

Dr. Johan Davidsson

Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences, Gothenburg, SWEDEN
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2011 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRM. Risling
M. Risling
SPS. Plantman
S. Plantman
MAM. Angeria
M. Angeria
ERE. Rostami
E. Rostami
BBB.-M. Bellander
B.-M. Bellander
JDJohan Davidsson
Johan Davidsson

1 January 2014 in Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ERElham Rostami
Elham Rostami
FKFrank Krueger
Frank Krueger
SPStefan Plantman
Stefan Plantman
JDJohan Davidsson
Johan Davidsson
DADenes Agoston
Denes Agoston
MRMårten Risling
Mårten Risling

1 January 2012 in Frontiers in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MRMårten Risling
Mårten Risling
JDJohan Davidsson
Johan Davidsson
A blast injury is a complex type of physical trauma resulting from the detonation of explosive compounds and has become an important issue due to the use of improvised explosive devices (IED) in current military conflicts. Blast-induced neurotrauma (BINT) is a major concern in contemporary military medicine and includes a variety of injuries that range from mild to lethal. Extreme forces and their complex propagation characterize BINT. Modern body protection and the development of armored military vehicles can be assumed to have changed the outcome of BINT. Primary blast injuries are caused by overpressure waves whereas secondary, tertiary, and quaternary blast injuries can have more varied origins such as the impact of fragments, abnormal movements, or heat. The characteristics of the blast wave can be assumed to be significantly different in open field detonations compared to explosions in a confined space, such an armored vehicle. Important parameters include peak pressure, duration, and shape of the pulse. Reflections from walls and armor can make the prediction of effects in individual cases very complex. Epidemiological data do not contain information of the comparative importance of the different blast mechanisms. It is therefore important to generate data in carefully designed animal models. Such models can be selective reproductions of a primary blast, penetrating injuries from fragments, acceleration movements, or combinations of such mechanisms. It is of crucial importance that the physical parameters of the employed models are well characterized so that the experiments can be reproduced in different laboratory settings. Ideally, pressure recordings should be calibrated by using the same equipment in several laboratories. With carefully designed models and thoroughly evaluated animal data it should be possible to achieve a translation of data between animal and clinical data. Imaging and computer simulation represent a possible link between experiments and studies of human cases. However, in order for mathematical simulations to be completely useful, the predictions will most likely have to be validated by detailed data from animal experiments. Some aspects of BINT can conceivably be studied in vitro. However, factors such as systemic response, brain edema, inflammation, vasospasm, or changes in synaptic transmission and behavior must be evaluated in experimental animals. Against this background, it is necessary that such animal experiments are carefully developed imitations of actual components in the blast injury. This paper describes and discusses examples of different designs of experimental models relevant to BINT.

1 January 2012 in Frontiers in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ERElham Rostami
Elham Rostami
JDJohan Davidsson
Johan Davidsson
KNKian Chye Ng
Kian Chye Ng
JLJia Lu
Jia Lu
AGAndrea Gyorgy
Andrea Gyorgy
MRMårten Risling
Mårten Risling
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is one of the most common neuronal insults and can lead to long-term disabilities. mTBI occurs when the head is exposed to a rapid acceleration-deceleration movement triggering axonal injuries. Our limited understanding of the underlying pathological changes makes it difficult to predict the outcome of mTBI. In this study we used a scalable rat model for rotational acceleration TBI, previously characterized for the threshold of axonal pathology. We have analyzed whether a TBI just above the defined threshold would induce any detectable behavioral changes and/or changes in serum biomarkers. The effect of injury on sensory motor functions, memory and anxiety were assessed by beam walking, radial arms maze and elevated plus maze at 3–7 days following TBI. The only behavioral deficits found were transient impairments in working and reference memory. Blood serum was analyzed at 1, 3, and 14 days after injury for changes in selected protein biomarkers. Serum levels of neurofilament heavy chain and Tau, as well as S100B and myelin basic protein showed significant increases in the injured animals at all time points. No signs of macroscopic injuries such as intracerebral hematomas or contusions were found. Amyloid precursor protein immunostaining indicated axonal injuries at all time points analyzed. In summary, this model mimics some of the key symptoms of mTBI, such as transient memory impairment, which is paralleled by an increase in serum biomarkers. Our findings suggest that serum biomarkers may be used to detect mTBI. The model provides a suitable foundation for further investigation of the underlying pathology of mTBI.

10 April 2012 in Journal of Neurotrauma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPStefan Plantman
Stefan Plantman
KNKian Chye Ng
Kian Chye Ng
JLJia Lu
Jia Lu
JDJohan Davidsson
Johan Davidsson
MRMårten Risling
Mårten Risling
A penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) occurs when an object impacts the head with sufficient force to penetrate the skin, skull, and meninges, and inflict injury directly to the brain parenchyma. This type of injury has been notoriously difficult to model in small laboratory animals such as rats or mice. To this end, we have established a novel non-fatal model for pTBI based on a modified air rifle that accelerates a pellet, which in turn impacts a small probe that then causes the injury to the experimental animal's brain. In the present study, we have focused on the acute phase and characterized the tissue destruction, including increasing cavity formation, white matter degeneration, hemorrhage, edema, and gliosis. We also used a battery of behavioral models to examine the neurological outcome, with the most noteworthy finding being impairment of reference memory function. In conclusion, we have described a number of events taking place after pTBI in our model. We expect this model will prove useful in our efforts to unravel the biological events underlying injury and regeneration after pTBI and possibly serve as a useful animal model in the development of novel therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.

1 November 2012 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAzra Habibovic
Azra Habibovic
JDJohan Davidsson
Johan Davidsson