Jonathan Guez

Prof. Jonathan Guez

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 April 2011 in Journal of Traumatic Stress
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jonathan GuezJonathan Guez
Jonathan Guez
MNMoshe Naveh‐Benjamin
Moshe Naveh‐Benjamin
YYYan Yankovsky
Yan Yankovsky
JCJonathan Cohen
Jonathan Cohen
ASAsher Shiber
Asher Shiber
HSHadar Shalev
Hadar Shalev

2 June 2014 in Memory
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jonathan GuezJonathan Guez
Jonathan Guez
ARAinat Rogel
Ainat Rogel
NGNir Getter
Nir Getter
EKEldad Keha
Eldad Keha
TCTzlil Cohen
Tzlil Cohen
DTDoron Todder
Doron Todder
The relationships between memory processes and oscillatory electroencephalography (EEG) are well established. Neurofeedback training (NFT) may cause participants to better regulate their brain EEG oscillations. The present study is a double-blind sham-controlled design investigating the effect of NFT on memory. NFT included up-training upper alpha (UA) band, up-training sensory-motor rhythm (SMR) band and sham protocol. Thirty healthy adult volunteers were randomly divided into three treatment groups. NFT sessions (30 min each) took place twice weekly for a total of 10 sessions while memory testing took place pre- and post-training. The results indicate dissociation between SMR and UA NFT and different memory processes. While the SMR protocol resulted in improving automatic, item-specific and familiarity-based processes in memory, the UA protocol resulted in improved strategic and controlled recollection. The implications of the results are discussed.

12 April 2016 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jonathan GuezJonathan Guez
Jonathan Guez
RSRotem Saar-Ashkenazy
Rotem Saar-Ashkenazy
EKEldad Keha
Eldad Keha
CTChen Tiferet-Dweck
Chen Tiferet-Dweck
Psychological stress, induced by the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), has repeatedly been shown to alter memory performance. Although factors influencing memory performance such as stimulus nature (verbal /pictorial) and emotional valence have been extensively studied, results whether stress impairs or improves memory are still inconsistent. This study aimed at exploring the effect of TSST on item versus associative memory for neutral, verbal, and pictorial stimuli. 48 healthy subjects were recruited, 24 participants were randomly assigned to the TSST group and the remaining 24 participants were assigned to the control group. Stress reactivity was measured by psychological (subjective state anxiety ratings) and physiological (Galvanic skin response recording) measurements. Subjects performed an item-association memory task for both stimulus types (words, pictures) simultaneously, before, and after the stress/non-stress manipulation. The results showed that memory recognition for pictorial stimuli was higher than for verbal stimuli. Memory for both words and pictures was impaired following TSST; while the source for this impairment was specific to associative recognition in pictures, a more general deficit was observed for verbal material, as expressed in decreased recognition for both items and associations following TSST. Response latency analysis indicated that the TSST manipulation decreased response time but at the cost of memory accuracy. We conclude that stress does not uniformly affect memory; rather it interacts with the task’s cognitive load and stimulus type. Applying the current study results to patients diagnosed with disorders associated with traumatic stress, our findings in healthy subjects under acute stress provide further support for our assertion that patients’ impaired memory originates in poor recollection processing following depletion of attentional resources.

1 October 2013 in Psychiatry Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jonathan GuezJonathan Guez
Jonathan Guez
JCJonathan Cohen
Jonathan Cohen
MNMoshe Naveh-Benjamin
Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
ASAsher Shiber
Asher Shiber
YYYan Yankovsky
Yan Yankovsky
HSHadar Shalev
Hadar Shalev

10 November 2024 in Journal of Loss and Trauma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Rotem SaarRotem Saar
Rotem Saar
OBOfir Ben-Yaakov
Ofir Ben-Yaakov
Jonathan GuezJonathan Guez
Jonathan Guez
YBYoav Bergman
Yoav Bergman

17 July 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jonathan GuezJonathan Guez
Jonathan Guez
RSRotem Saar-Ashkenazy
Rotem Saar-Ashkenazy
LMLiran Mualem
Liran Mualem
MEMatan Efrati
Matan Efrati
Eldad KehaEldad Keha
Eldad Keha
The effect of emotional arousal on memory presents a complex pattern with previous studies reporting conflicting results of both improved and reduced memory performance following arousal manipulations. In this study we further tested the effect of negative emotional arousal (NEA) on individual-item recognition and associative recognition of neutral stimuli in healthy participants, and hypothesized that NEA will particularly impair associative memory performance. The current study consists of two experiments; in both, participants studied a list of word-pairs and were then tested for items (items recognition test), and for associations (associative recognition test). In the first experiment, the arousal manipulation was induced by flashing emotionally-negative or neutral pictures between study-pairs while in the second experiment arousal was induced by presenting emotionally-negative or neutral pictures between lists. The results of the two experiments converged and supported an associative memory deficit observed under NEA conditions. We suggest that NEA is associated with an altered ability to bind one stimulus to another as a result of impaired recollection, resulting in poorer associative memory performance. The current study findings may contribute to the understanding of the mechanism underlying memory impairments reported in disorders associated with traumatic stress.