Julián De La Torre Cisneros

Mr. Julián De La Torre Cisneros

Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Andalusia, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 June 2009 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJulián De La Torre Cisneros
Julián De La Torre Cisneros
ADAntonio Doblas
Antonio Doblas
JAJosé María Aguado
José María Aguado
RJRafael San Juan
Rafael San Juan
MBMarino Blanes
Marino Blanes
SDSpanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases
Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases
Background. It is necessary to clarify the incidence of and risk factors for tuberculosis (TB) among solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients as well

1 June 2017 in International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JCJuan J. Castón
Juan J. Castón
ILIsabel Lacort-Peralta
Isabel Lacort-Peralta
PMPilar Martín-Dávila
Pilar Martín-Dávila
BLBelén Loeches
Belén Loeches
STSalvador Tabares
Salvador Tabares
JPJosé R. Paño-Pardo
José R. Paño-Pardo
The primary objective was to describe clinical features, treatment and outcomes in patients with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) bacteremia. Additionally, patients treated with ceftazidime/avibactam (study group) were compared to the rest of the patients (comparator group) to determine the influence of the treatment in both crude mortality and clinical cure. Multicenter and retrospective study that included patients with hematologic malignancies who had CPE bacteremia. A bivariate analysis was performed to compare the clinical variables between the study group and the control group. 31 patients were included. Bacteremia was considered primary in 14 (45%) patients. Overall crude mortality at 30days was 45.2% (n=14). Mortality was more frequent when septic shock (78.6% vs 11.8%; p>0.001) and higher Pitt score (6+14 vs 1.5+4; p<0.01) were present. 8 patients (25.8%) received treatment with ceftazidime/avibactam. No significant differences in crude mortality were found between study and comparator groups (p=0.19). In contrast, patients in study group had higher clinical cure rates than the comparator group within 14days of initiating treatment (85.7% vs. 34.8%, respectively, p=0.031). CPE bacteremia is associated with high mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies. Ceftazidime/avibactam may be an effective alternative for treating these patients.

25 October 2014 in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMarcelino Gonzalez-Padilla
Marcelino Gonzalez-Padilla
JCJulián De La Torre Cisneros
Julián De La Torre Cisneros
FRFrancisco Rivera-Espinar
Francisco Rivera-Espinar
APAntonio Pontes-Moreno
Antonio Pontes-Moreno
LLLorena López-Cerero
Lorena López-Cerero
JBJesus Rodríguez Baño
Jesus Rodríguez Baño
Antimicrobial therapy for sepsis caused by carbapenem- and colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is not well established. We hypothesized that the early use of gentamicin in cases due to susceptible organisms would decrease the crude mortality rate of this infection. This retrospective cohort study examined 50 cases of sepsis caused by carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae occurring between June 2012 and February 2013 during an outbreak of K. pneumoniae ST512 producing KPC-3, SHV-11 and TEM-1. Survival curves categorized by the use of gentamicin were constructed using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Eight multivariate models using Cox regression were designed to study the risk factors for mortality and test the hypothesis. The 30 day crude mortality rate was 38%. The use of targeted gentamicin was associated with reduced mortality (20.7% versus 61.9%, P = 0.02). In all multivariate regression models, the use of gentamicin was independently associated with lower mortality until Day 30 (HR 0.17–0.29, P = 0.03–0.002 depending on the model) after controlling for other potential confounding variables such as age, optimal treatment, renal function, severity of infection, underlying disease, use of tigecycline and previous hospitalization. Gentamicin reduced the mortality from sepsis caused by this K. pneumoniae ST512 clone producing KPC-3, SHV-11 and TEM-1.

1 December 2011 in Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJulián De La Torre Cisneros
Julián De La Torre Cisneros
PMPatricia Munoz
Patricia Munoz
JCJuan José Castón
Juan José Castón
JAJosé María Aguado
José María Aguado
SCSara Cantisán
Sara Cantisán
FZFelipe Zurbano
Felipe Zurbano

22 June 2021 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APAurora Páez-Vega
Aurora Páez-Vega
BGBelén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez
Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez
MAMaria L Agüera
Maria L Agüera
CFCarme Facundo
Carme Facundo
DRDolores Redondo-Pachón
Dolores Redondo-Pachón
JCJulián De La Torre Cisneros
Julián De La Torre Cisneros
Antiviral prophylaxis is recommended in cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive kidney transplant (KT) recipients receiving antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as induction. An alternative strategy of premature discontinuation of prophylaxis after CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) recovery (immunoguided prevention) has not been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether it is effective and safe to discontinue prophylaxis when CMV-CMI is detected and to continue with preemptive therapy. In this open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to follow immunoguided strategy, receiving prophylaxis (valganciclovir 900 mg daily) until CMV-CMI recovery or to receive fixed-duration prophylaxis until day +90. After prophylaxis, preemptive therapy (valganciclovir 900 mg twice daily) was indicated in both arms until month 6. The primary and secondary outcomes were incidence of CMV disease and replication, respectively, within the first 12 months. Desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) assessed two deleterious events (CMV disease/replication and neutropenia). A total of 150 CMV-seropositive KT recipients were randomly assigned. There was no difference in the incidence of CMV disease (0% vs. 2.7%; P = 0.149) and replication (17.1% vs. 13.5%; log-rank test, P = 0.422) between both arms. Incidence of neutropenia was lower in the immunoguided arm (9.2% vs. 37.8%; OR, 6.0; P < 0.001). A total of 66.1% of patients in the immunoguided arm showed a better DOOR, indicating a greater likelihood of a better outcome. Prophylaxis can be prematurely discontinued in CMV-seropositive KT patients receiving ATG when CMV-CMI is recovered since no significant increase in the incidence of CMV replication or disease is observed.

25 February 2015 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJulián De La Torre Cisneros
Julián De La Torre Cisneros
RSRafael San-Juan
Rafael San-Juan
CRClara M. Rosso-Fernández
Clara M. Rosso-Fernández
JSJ. Tiago Silva
J. Tiago Silva
AMAgustin Muñoz-Sanz
Agustin Muñoz-Sanz
JAJose Maria Aguado
Jose Maria Aguado
Background. It is necessary to develop a safe alternative to isoniazid for tuberculosis prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin. Methods. An open-label, prospective, multicenter, randomized study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin (500 mg q24h for 9 months) initiated in patients awaiting liver transplantation and isoniazid (300 mg q24h for 9 months) initiated post-transplant when liver function was stabilized. Efficacy was measured by tuberculosis incidence at 18 months after transplantation. All adverse events related to the medication were recorded. Results. CONSORT guidelines were followed in order to present the results. The safety committee suspended the study through a safety analysis when 64 patients had been included (31 in the isoniazid arm and 33 in the levofloxacin arm). The reason for suspension was an unexpected incidence of severe tenosynovitis in the levofloxacin arm (18.2%). Although the clinical course was favorable in all cases, tenosynovitis persisted for 7 weeks in some patients. No patients treated with isoniazid, developed tenosynovitis. Only 32.2% of patients randomized to isoniazid (10/31) and 54.5% of patients randomized to levofloxacin (18/33, P = .094) completed prophylaxis. No patient developed tuberculosis during the study follow-up (median 270 days). Conclusions. Levofloxacin prophylaxis of tuberculosis in liver transplant candidates is associated with a high incidence of tenosynovitis that limits its potential utility.