Kenta Fujimura

Dr. Kenta Fujimura

Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 November 2019 in Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KFKenta Fujimura
Kenta Fujimura
HKHitoshi Kagaya
Hitoshi Kagaya
CEChiharu Endou
Chiharu Endou
AIAkihito Ishihara
Akihito Ishihara
KNKozue Nishigaya
Kozue Nishigaya
ESEiichi Saitoh
Eiichi Saitoh

1 April 2024 in European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KFKenta Fujimura
Kenta Fujimura
HKHitoshi Kagaya
Hitoshi Kagaya
RIRyoka Itoh
Ryoka Itoh
CEChiharu Endo
Chiharu Endo
HTHiroki Tanikawa
Hiroki Tanikawa
HMHirofumi Maeda
Hirofumi Maeda
Article: Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for preventing shoulder subluxation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2024 Mar 14 - Minerva Medica - Journals

1 May 2018 in Gait & Posture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Hiroki TanikawaHiroki Tanikawa
Hiroki Tanikawa
HKHitoshi Kagaya
Hitoshi Kagaya
KIKeisuke Inagaki
Keisuke Inagaki
YKYusuke Kotsuji
Yusuke Kotsuji
KSKeita Suzuki
Keita Suzuki
YKYoshikiyo Kanada
Yoshikiyo Kanada

30 March 2022 in Frontiers in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KFKenta Fujimura
Kenta Fujimura
MMMasahiko Mukaino
Masahiko Mukaino
SIShota Itoh
Shota Itoh
HMHaruna Miwa
Haruna Miwa
RIRyoka Itoh
Ryoka Itoh
YOYohei Otaka
Yohei Otaka
Background: Spasticity is defined as a velocity-dependent increase in tonic stretch reflexes and is manually assessed in clinical practice. However, the best method for the clinical assessment of spasticity has not been objectively described. This study analyzed the clinical procedure to assess spasticity of the elbow joint using an electrogoniometer and investigated the appropriate velocity required to elicit a spastic response and the influence of velocity on the kinematic response pattern. Methods: This study included eight healthy individuals and 15 patients with spasticity who scored 1 or 1+ on the modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Examiners were instructed to manually assess spasticity twice at two different velocities (slow and fast velocity conditions). During the assessment, velocity, deceleration value, and angle [described as the % range of motion (%ROM)] at the moment of resistance were measured using an electrogoniometer. Differences between the slow and fast conditions were evaluated. In addition, variations among the fast condition such as the responses against passive elbow extension at <200, 200–300, 300–400, 400°/s velocities were compared between the MAS 1+, MAS 1, and control groups. Results: Significant differences were observed in the angular deceleration value and %ROM in the fast velocity condition (417 ± 80°/s) between patients and healthy individuals, but there was no difference in the slow velocity condition (103 ± 29°/s). In addition, the deceleration values were significantly different between the MAS 1 and MAS 1+ groups in velocity conditions faster than 300°/s. In contrast, the value of %ROM plateaued when the velocity was faster than 200°/s. Conclusion: The velocity of the passive motion had a significant effect on the response pattern of the elbow joint. The velocity-response pattern differed between deceleration and the angle at which the catch occurred; the value of deceleration value for passive motion was highly dependent on the velocity, while the %ROM was relatively stable above a certain velocity threshold. These results provide clues for accurate assessment of spasticity in clinical practice.

23 April 2019 in European Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KFKenta Fujimura
Kenta Fujimura
HKHitoshi Kagaya
Hitoshi Kagaya
HOHisae Onaka
Hisae Onaka
NNNao Nagasawa
Nao Nagasawa
AIAkihito Ishihara
Akihito Ishihara
ESEiichi Saitoh
Eiichi Saitoh
Background: Treatment with Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is effective in decreasing upper limb spasticity. Objective: This study aimed to determine the differences in the outcome based on the upper limb motor function before BoNT-A treatment. Methods: The subjects were 61 patients who underwent BoNT-A treatment for upper limb spasticity. Limb function was evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity (FMA-UE), modified Ashworth scale, passive range of motion and disability assessment scale before treatment as well as 2, 6, and 12 weeks after treatment. We divided the total and each subscale of FMA-UE before BoNT-A administration into beyond-the-mean-score group (higher score group) and below-the-mean-score group (lower score group). Results: In both the higher and lower score groups of the FMA-UE total and modified Ashworth scale scores improved significantly after treatment. In FMA-UE, the higher score group of subscale A improved significantly, but subscale C decreased significantly at 2 and 6 weeks after the administration. The lower score group of total, subscale A, and B improved significantly. In the disability assessment scale, the self-dressing capability at 6 weeks and limb position at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the administration improved significantly in the higher score group. In the lower score group, the hygiene capability at 2 weeks as well as the dressing capability and limb position improved significantly at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after administration. Conclusions: The time course after administration of BoNT-A differed based on upper limb motor function before injection. When administering BoNT-A into the finger flexor muscles of a patient, we should carefully judge the indications for administration.

3 January 2025 in Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKenji Kawakami
Kenji Kawakami
STShigeo Tanabe
Shigeo Tanabe
DKDaiki Kinoshita
Daiki Kinoshita
RKRyo Kitabatake
Ryo Kitabatake
HKHiroo Koshisaki
Hiroo Koshisaki
HSHiroaki Sakurai
Hiroaki Sakurai
Objective: To identify factors associated with earlier independence in “real-life walking” during hospitalization in subacute stroke patients. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Subjects/Patients: Two hundred and six hemiplegic patients. Methods: Functional Independence Measure (FIM) walking items were measured biweekly from admission to discharge. Patients were grouped by achieving independent “real-life walking” (FIM-walking score ≥6). Time to independence, stratified by age, FIM motor score (FIM-M), FIM cognitive score (FIM-C), and Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC) scores were compared using Kaplan–Meier plots and log-rank tests. Hazard ratios were calculated via multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Results: The median time to independence was 4 weeks, with significant differences (p < 0.05) by age, FIM-M, FIM-C, and FAC stratification. Age ≤64 years (hazard ratio 1.92, 95% confidence interval 1.21–3.06), FIM-C ≥25 (hazard ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.52–3.86), and FAC ≥3 (hazard ratio 1.98, 95% confidence interval 1.22–3.21) significantly affected earlier walking independence (all p < 0.01). Impeding factors were FIM-M ≤38 (hazard ratio 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.13–0.40; p < 0.01) and FAC = 0 (hazard ratio 0.184, 95% confidence interval 0.06–0.62; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Early improvement in “real-life walking” was associated with younger age, greater cognitive function, and greater “test-setting walking” ability on admission. Low activities of daily living independence and “test-setting walking” ability hindered early progress.