Kiran Kumar Mohapatra

Dr. Kiran Kumar Mohapatra

Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, India
orcid
Scientist Soil Science

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 October 2021 in International Journal of Phytoremediation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BBBiswojit Biswal
Biswojit Biswal
SSSatish Kumar Singh
Satish Kumar Singh
APABHIK PATRA
ABHIK PATRA
KMKiran Kumar Mohapatra
Kiran Kumar Mohapatra
The pot experiment was conducted to explore the phytoremediation potential of two different marigold species grown in heavy metals contaminated red, black, alluvial, recent river clay, sewage irrigated, sewage sludge, and garden soil. Different soil types were treated uniformly with lead (20 mg Pb kg−1 soil), cadmium (5 mg Cd kg−1 soil), chromium (30 mg Cr kg−1 soil) and nickel (10 mg Ni kg−1 soil). Completely randomized design (CRD) was used with three replications. African marigold (Tagetes erecta) recorded ∼89.4% more dry matter yield over French marigold (Tagetes patula) when grown under metals treated soils. Both the marigold species were highly effective for removing Cd and Ni from contaminated soils (TF >1) however, Ni (TF ∼14.9) was more efficiently accumulated by T. patula and Cd (TF ∼12.1) by T. erecta. Higher biomass yield in T. erecta resulted higher accumulation of heavy metals (except Cr) compared to T. patula. Assessment of contamination factor (CF) and geo-accumulation index (Igeo) of heavy metals indicates that post-harvest soils had moderate to high degree of contamination by different metals, Cr being the highest. It may be concluded that T. erecta was more efficient in extracting heavy metals from different heavy metals contaminated soils. Novelty statement Contamination of land with heavy metals poses severe environmental threats. Physical and chemical remediation techniques are generally used for remediating metals contaminated sites. These methods are cost-intensive and therefore, commercially non-viable, besides being disruptive in nature and causing deterioration of soil. Alternatively, bio-remediation techniques are cost-effective and environment friendly. Among the various phytoremediation techniques, hyperaccumulator plants are most commonly used for the remediation of the contaminated sites. It has been found that different species of the same plant (marigold) differ in their ability to accumulate metals under various contaminated soils having different properties. Thus, this experiment provided an unique opportunity to investigate the effect of various soil properties on metal accumulation efficacy of marigold under metal-spiked soils. Marigold plants can grow rapidly by developing a robust root system which helps them to survive under contaminated soil environment. Thus, marigold being ornamental plant could be used to decontaminate polluted sites while providing ornamental value and may serve as a source of commercially valuable products extracting metals from biomass by way of incineration. However, meager information is available about the usage of various marigold species for phytoremediation of heavy metals under different metal-polluted soils. In the current experiment, we intend to evaluate the potential use of two different marigold species (Tagetes patula and Tagetes erecta) in remediating heavy metals under nine soils of different nature spiked with metals and assessing heavy metals pollution load indexes in these polluted soils.

14 April 2023 in Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJarupula Suman
Jarupula Suman
Amitava RakshitAmitava Rakshit
Amitava Rakshit
APABHIK PATRA
ABHIK PATRA
ADAsik Dutta
Asik Dutta
VTVinod Kumar Tripathi
Vinod Kumar Tripathi
SKS. Krishnamoorthi
S. Krishnamoorthi

22 August 2022 in Environmental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RPRanjan Kumar Patra
Ranjan Kumar Patra
DBDenish Behera
Denish Behera
KMKiran Kumar Mohapatra
Kiran Kumar Mohapatra
DSDebadatta Sethi
Debadatta Sethi
MMMitali Mandal
Mitali Mandal
Ravindran BalasubramaniRavindran Balasubramani
Ravindran Balasubramani

13 April 2021 in Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAdyasha Swain
Adyasha Swain
SSSatish Kumar Singh
Satish Kumar Singh
KMKiran Kumar Mohapatra
Kiran Kumar Mohapatra
APAbhik Patra
Abhik Patra

19 April 2022 in Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGSaheed Garnaik
Saheed Garnaik
PSPrasanna Kumar Samant
Prasanna Kumar Samant
MMMitali Mandal
Mitali Mandal
TMTushar Ranjan Mohanty
Tushar Ranjan Mohanty
SDSanat Kumar Dwibedi
Sanat Kumar Dwibedi
HNHari Sankar Nayak
Hari Sankar Nayak

18 April 2023 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KMKiran Kumar Mohapatra
Kiran Kumar Mohapatra
ANA. K. Nayak
A. K. Nayak
RPR. K. Patra
R. K. Patra
RTRahul Tripathi
Rahul Tripathi
CSChinmaya Kumar Swain
Chinmaya Kumar Swain
MTM. Tesfai
M. Tesfai
Introduction: Conventional rice production techniques are less economical and more vulnerable to sustainable utilization of farm resources as well as significantly contributed GHGs to atmosphere.Methods: In order to assess the best rice production system for coastal areas, six rice production techniques were evaluated, including SRI-AWD (system of rice intensification with alternate wetting and drying (AWD)), DSR-CF (direct seeded rice with continuous flooding (CF)), DSR-AWD (direct seeded rice with AWD), TPR-CF (transplanted rice with CF), TPR-AWD (transplanted rice with AWD), and FPR-CF (farmer practice with CF). The performance of these technologies was assessed using indicators such as rice productivity, energy balance, GWP (global warming potential), soil health indicators, and profitability. Finally, using these indicators, a climate smartness index (CSI) was calculated.Results and discussion: Rice grown with SRI-AWD method had 54.8 % higher CSI over FPR-CF, and also give 24.5 to 28.3% higher CSI for DSR and TPR as well. There evaluations based on the climate smartness index can provide cleaner and more sustainable rice production and can be used as guiding principle for policy makers.