Background: Breastfeeding in Syria is a common practice supported by social norms, family traditions, and cultural values. In Hungary, recent statistics show that exclusive breastfeeding is significantly lower than the recommendation of the World Health Organization. Understanding the perspectives of educated young ladies is crucial for discovering the difficulties of breastfeeding practices within Syrian–Hungarian societies. This study explores the sociocultural factors and their impact on breastfeeding behaviours among female students in Syria and Hungary. Methods: A comprehensive, multi-section questionnaire was administered to 317 students from Damascus University and 303 students from Hungarian universities, designed to assess breastfeeding behaviours evaluated through The Breastfeeding Behaviour Questionnaire (BBQ). Results: The results in both societies showed remarkable awareness and understanding among participants regarding breastfeeding. Traditions and culture affect Syrian society more than Hungarian society; the two societies have restricted responses toward breastfeeding in public and different reactions to breastfeeding in front of males or females. Most students disagree with preferring formula feeding to breastfeeding when it is related to the family or the husband’s desire only. At the same time, agreement with choosing the bottle when the mother returns to work instead of exclusively breastfeeding is valued differently in the two societies. Conclusions: This study elucidates the essential the sociocultural factors influencing breastfeeding attitudes among Syrian and Hungarian female students, highlighting the need for culturally suitable strategies to improve breastfeeding practices in both countries.

Background: Breastfeeding is the ideal source of nutrition for babies. Despite its benefits, breastfeeding practices and attitudes vary across cultures, influenced by societal norms, education, and personal experiences. This article shows the attitude differences among female students in Syria and Hungary and how sociocultural aspects impact their attitude towards breastfeeding. Methods: The questionnaire was a part of a multi-section questionnaire presented to 317 Syrian students and 303 Hungarian students. It assessed students’ attitudes towards breastfeeding through the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS). In addition to cross-tabulations, an exploratory data categorisation method, i.e., cluster analysis, was used in analysing the data. Results: Participants in both countries demonstrated strong agreement with statements highlighting the emotional and nutritional advantages of breastfeeding. In total, 67.2% of the participants disagreed with the idea that formula feeding is more convenient; similarly, 66.3% of them disagreed that breastfeeding causes fathers to feel emotionally excluded. Attitudes toward breastfeeding in public were more divided, reflecting the sensitivity of the topic and varying degrees of acceptance, with 48.7% of respondents disagreeing. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that nationality or age were significant predictors of belonging to various attitude clusters (SBM, SFF, FT): Syrian respondents and younger participants aged 21–30 years were more likely to belong to the Supporters of Breast Milk (SBM) cluster. In addition, paternal education level and urban residence also influenced feeding attitudes. Conclusions: This study shows the differences in attitude among Syrian and Hungarian female students, which is rooted in cultural diversity and its effect on individuals’ decisions.

Background: Breastfeeding is known as the perfect nutrition for babies. Despite its benefits, breastfeeding practices and attitudes vary across cultures, influenced by soci-etal norms, education, and personal experiences. This article studies the attitude dif-ferences among female students in Syria and Hungary and how sociocultural aspects impact their attitude towards breastfeeding. Methods: The questionnaire was a part of a multi-section questionnaire presented to 317 Syrian students from Damascus Uni-versity and 303 Hungarian students from Semmelweis University and Eötvös Loránd University. It assessed students’ attitudes towards breastfeeding through the Iowa In-fant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS). SPSS was used to analyse data. Results: Partici-pants in both countries demonstrated strong agreement with statements highlighting the emotional and nutritional advantages of breastfeeding. Many participants disa-greed with the idea that formula feeding is more convenient or that breastfeeding causes fathers to feel emotionally excluded. Attitudes toward breastfeeding in public were more divided, reflecting the sensitivity of the topic and varying degrees of ac-ceptance. Notable cultural differences emerged, with Syrian participants generally ex-pressing more traditional and favourable views of breastfeeding, especially regarding ease of digestion and emotional fulfilment. In contrast, Hungarian participants tended to be more neutral or uncertain on several issues, particularly those related to nutri-tional content and concerns about overfeeding. Conclusions: This study shows the differences in attitude among Syrian and Hungarian female students, which is rooted in cultural diversity and its effect on individuals’ decisions.

Background/Objectives: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major public health challenge, and several lifestyle-related factors associated with later T2DM may already emerge during the secondary school years. Socioeconomic status (SES), nutrition-related behaviors, physical activity, and basic diabetes-related knowledge may shape these early risk-related patterns. This study examined the relationships between SES, adapted FINDRISC-based T2DM-related risk patterns, and diabetes-related knowledge among Hungarian secondary school students aged 16–20 years. Methods: A nationwide, cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted among students attending Hungarian Baptist secondary schools (N = 1585). SES was classified by Two-Step cluster analysis based on parental education, parental occupation, number of books in the household, and frequency of travel abroad. Relative T2DM-related risk patterns were described using an age-adapted FINDRISC-based screening approach, and basic diabetes-related knowledge was assessed using a 12-item questionnaire. Associations were examined using cross-tabulation and regression analyses in SPSS version 27.0. Results: Most respondents fell into the lower categories of the adapted FINDRISC-based screening framework, whereas 7.4% were classified into the moderate or high adapted FINDRISC-based screening categories. SES was significantly associated with adapted FINDRISC-based screening categories (p < 0.001). Compared with the medium-SES group, students in the low-SES group had higher odds of belonging to a higher adapted FINDRISC-based screening category (OR = 1.81; 95% CI: 1.27–2.57; p = 0.001). SES was also significantly associated with basic diabetes-related knowledge profiles (p = 0.015); students with high SES were less likely to be in the low-knowledge group than in the high-knowledge group (OR = 0.62; p = 0.039). Conclusions: Social inequalities in T2DM-related risk patterns and diabetes-related knowledge are already visible among secondary school students aged 16–20 years. The adapted FINDRISC-based approach may be useful as a school-based, non-invasive descriptive screening framework for characterizing relative T2DM-related risk patterns, but it is not a validated risk prediction instrument for this age group.

Introduction: The current shortage in the global nursing workforce underscores the importance of understanding factors associated with career choice and professional retention. This study aimed to identify background profiles among Hungarian Bachelor of Science in Nursing students and to examine their associations with career-choice patterns and perceptions of the Graduate Nursing Residency Program (GNRP). Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 1 September 2025 and 1 March 2026 at seven Hungarian higher education institutions. Of 979 questionnaires screened, eight were excluded because of incomplete cluster-analysis data, resulting in an analytical sample of 971 students. Student background profiles were explored using TwoStep cluster analysis. The four-cluster solution was retained on the basis of model-fit change, cluster-size balance, parsimony, and substantive interpretability; the average silhouette value was 0.20, indicating weak separation. Results: Four exploratory profiles were identified: students from families with a university degree (17.3%), students with a rural healthcare orientation (37.3%), urban middle-class students (24.2%), and students with an urban mobility background (21.2%). The timing of career choice differed across profiles (p < 0.001; Cramer’s V = 0.179). Awareness of the GNRP was limited, with 69.7% reporting no prior knowledge. Perceived contribution to professional development differed statistically across profiles (p = 0.033; partial η² = 0.009), but the effect was small. Conclusions: The findings describe exploratory background profiles and modest associations rather than stable student categories or causal effects. Limited awareness and generally favorable perceptions of the GNRP suggest potential relevance for future communication and evaluation, but the present study does not establish program effectiveness.

Breastfeeding in Syria is fraught with many challenges due to the ongoing war. In Hungary, recent statistics show that exclusive breastfeeding is significantly lower than the recommendation of the World Health Organization. Understanding the perspectives of educated young ladies is crucial for discovering the difficulties of breastfeeding practices within Syrian and Hungarian societies. This study explores the socio-cultural factors and their impact on breastfeeding behaviours among female students in Syria and Hungary. A comprehensive, multi-section questionnaire was administered to 317 students from Damascus University and 303 from Hungarian universities, designed to assess breastfeeding behaviours evaluated through The Breastfeeding Behaviour Questionnaire (BBQ). The results in both societies showed remarkable awareness and understanding among participants regarding breastfeeding. Traditions and religion affect Syrian society more than Hungarian society; the two societies have restricted responses toward breastfeeding in public and different reactions to breastfeeding in front of males or females. Most students disagree with preferring formula feeding to breastfeeding when it is related to the family or the husband’s desire only. At the same time, agreement with choosing the bottle when the mother returns to work instead of exclusively breastfeeding is valued differently in the two societies. This study shows essential socio-cultural factors influencing breastfeeding attitudes among Syrian and Hungarian female students, highlighting the need for culturally suitable strategies to improve breastfeeding practices in both countries.