The lateral organ boundary domain (LBD) gene is a plant-specific transcription factor that plays a crucial role in plant growth and development, including the development of lateral vegetative organs such as leaf and root development, as well as floral organs such as sepal, petal, and pollen development. Passion fruit is a tropical fruit with important agricultural, economic and ornamental value. However, there is no systematic research report available on the LBD gene family of passion fruit. In this study, a genome-wide analysis of passion fruit LBD genes identified 33 PeLBDs that were unevenly distributed across nine chromosomes. According to phylogenetic and gene structure analysis, PeLBDs were divided into two categories: Class I (27) and Class II (6). Homologous protein modeling results showed that the gene members of the two subfamilies were structurally and functionally similar. Cis-acting element and target gene prediction analysis suggested that PeLBDs might participate in various biological processes by regulating diverse target genes involved in growth and development, metabolism, hormones and stress response. Collinearity analysis indicated that the expansion of the PeLBD gene family likely took place mainly by segmental duplication, and some duplicated gene pairs such as PeLBD13/15 might show functional redundancy, while most duplicated gene pairs such as PeLBD8/12 showed different expression profiles indicating their functional diversification. After filtering low expressed genes, all Class Id PeLBDs were more highly expressed during pollen development. At the same, all Class Ic and many other PeLBDs were relatively highly expressed during ovule development, similar with their homologous LBD genes in Arabidopsis, indicating their potential regulatory roles in reproductive tissue development in passion fruit. PeLBDs that were highly expressed in floral tissues were also expressed at a higher level in tendrils with some differences, indicating the close relationships of tendrils to floral tissues. Some genes such as PeLBD23/25 might be simultaneously related to floral development and leaf early formation in passion fruit, while other PeLBDs showed a strong tissue-specific expression. For example, PeLBD17/27/29 were specifically expressed in floral tissues, while PeLBD11 were only highly expressed in fruit, suggesting their specific function in the development of certain tissues. A qRT-PCR was conducted to verify the expression levels of six PeLBDs in different tissues. Our analysis provides a basis for the functional analysis of LBD genes and new insights into their regulatory roles in floral and vegetative tissue development.

Heat shock transcription factors (HSFs) activate heat shock protein gene expression by binding their promoters in response to heat stress and are considered to be pivotal transcription factors in plants. Eucalyptus is a superior source of fuel and commercial wood. During its growth, high temperature or other abiotic stresses could impact its defense capability and growth. Hsf genes have been cloned and sequenced in many plants, but rarely in Eucalyptus. In this study, we used bioinformatics methods to analyze and identify Eucalyptus Hsf genes, their chromosomal localization and structure. The phylogenetic relationship and conserved domains of their encoded proteins were further analyzed. A total of 36 Hsf genes were identified and authenticated from Eucalyptus, which were scattered across 11 chromosomes. They could be classified into three classes (A, B and C). Additionally, a large number of stress-related cis-regulatory elements were identified in the upstream promoter sequence of HSF, and cis-acting element analysis indicated that the expression of EgHsf may be regulated by plant growth and development, metabolism, hormones and stress responses. The expression profiles of five representative Hsf genes, EgHsf4, EgHsf9, EgHsf13, EgHsf24 and EgHsf32, under salt and temperature stresses were examined by qRT-PCR. The results show that the expression pattern of class B genes (EgHsf4, EgHsf24 and EgHsf32) was more tolerant to abiotic stresses than that of class A genes (EgHsf9 and EgHsf13). However, the expressions of all tested Hsf genes in six tissues were at different levels. Finally, we investigated the network of interplay between genes, and the results suggest that there may be synergistic effects between different Hsf genes in response to abiotic stresses. We conclude that the Hsf gene family played an important role in the growth and developmental processes of Eucalyptus and could be vital for maintaining cell homeostasis against external stresses. This study provides basic information on the members of the Hsf gene family in Eucalyptus and lays the foundation for the functional identification of related genes and the further investigation of their biological functions in plant stress regulation.

SUMMARY: Grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) frequently faces challenges from various pathogens, among which Plasmopara viticola is the most devastating one hindering grape production. During infection, P. viticola secretes a series of effectors into host cells to manipulate plant immune responses. Here, an RXLR effector of P. viticola , PvRXLR13, was identified as one that could disrupt immune processes and thus promote pathogen colonization. PvRXLR13 contained a functional signal peptide and was highly conserved across different destructive oomycetes. PvRXLR13 was significantly induced during P. viticola infection and could suppress elicitor chitin‐induced reactive oxygen species (ROS), callose deposition, and INF1‐triggered cell death. Furthermore, PvRXLR13 could also inhibit P. viticola ‐ and P. capsici‐ triggered H ₂ O ₂ accumulation and promote pathogen colonization in both grapevine and Nicotiana benthamiana , respectively. VvHY5, a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor, was found to be the host target of PvRXLR13. Further analysis revealed that overexpression of VvHY5 enhanced grapevine resistance to P. viticola and P. viticola ‐triggered H ₂ O ₂ accumulation. Furthermore, we found that VvHY5 directly bound to the promoter of the positive immune factor VvEDS1 and activated its expression, whereas PvRXLR13 attenuated the DNA‐binding activity of VvHY5 during P. viticola infection. Further analysis revealed that other members of grape bZIPs, VvbZIP6/9/21/32/34/37, were also involved in the defense response against P. viticola invasion. Just like HY5/HYH, all these bZIP family members were targeted by the effector PvRXLR13. Collectively, our findings suggest that P. viticola secretes a key effector PvRXLR13 to compromise the function in immune regulation of bZIP transcription factors to promote infection in grapevine.

Prostrate hairs are one of the anatomic barriers for grapevine resistance to pests and diseases, as well as in environmental adaptability, making them valuable for breeding programs. This study investigates the genetic determinants underlying prostrate hair density in grapevine, a key trait associated with resistance to pests and pathogens. Using an F₁ hybrid population derived from Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet Sauvignon cv.’ and V. pseudoreticulata W.T.Wang ‘Huadong1058’, we performed a combination of quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping and genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify the genomic regions influencing the density of prostrate hair. We identified a major locus on 9.56–10.54 Mbp of chromosome 17, designated as ‘LH2’, which accounts for 43% of the phenotypic variation. This locus was delineated with high precision, and 92 candidate genes were identified within the region. Functional enrichment analysis suggested that these genes are potentially involved in binding, catalytic activity, and various cellular processes. In particular, the SNP markers ‘chr17_10130288’ and ‘chr17_10428273’ were significantly associated with prostrate hair density, providing valuable information for marker-assisted selection. These findings offer a reliable target for analyzing the hair development mechanism of grapevine leaves and breeding new cultivars rich in prostrate hair on the back of the leaves.