Linda Chelan Li

Prof. Dr. Linda Chelan Li

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

28 October 2017 in Journal of Contemporary China
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HSH. Christoph Steinhardt
H. Christoph Steinhardt
Linda Chelan LiLinda Chelan Li
Linda Chelan Li
YJYihong Jiang
Yihong Jiang
This article addresses the challenges of understanding, measuring and explaining political identities in post-1997 Hong Kong. It shows that national and local identities are better conceptualized as two distinct attitudes and captured with separate scaled items than as opposite poles of one attitude measured in a single categorical item. This approach reveals that the key shift occurred not in local identity, but in nationalistic sentiments, which have initially increased but have been on a downward trend since 2008. It also shows that national and local identities were perceived as robustly compatible for most years since 1997, but have begun to drift apart in recent years. Considering competing accounts to explain national identity strength, trust in the central government stands out as the dominant factor. Discontent with livelihood conditions and socio-structural variables either have no significant effect or are to a large part the result of differences in political trust.

1 December 1997 in The China Quarterly
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Linda Chelan LiLinda Chelan Li
Linda Chelan Li
Central-provincial relations are an old issue which have plagued successive Chinese leaderships both before and after 1949. Indeed the spatial dimension, with its ramifications regarding power distribution and the complications around policy formulation and implementation, has been a perennial issue of concern in comparative politics. This old interest has been, in recent years, intensified by incessant central-provincial conflicts since reform, to the extent that the integration of the Chinese state has been called into question.


1 March 2000 in The China Quarterly
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Linda Chelan LiLinda Chelan Li
Linda Chelan Li
For two reasons the elevation of the law in government policy and political rhetoric in China in recent years inspires great interest and significance. The first is related to the perennial debate on the desirability and possibility of a “government of laws” versus a “government of men” in Chinese history. To what extent does the recent emphasis on the law indicate a movement towards the former from the latter? Given the importance of the issues of institutionalization and power distribution in the analysis of Chinese politics, what is the significance of this development of the law? What is, in other words, themeaningof the recent policy on the “rule of law”? Does it mean something new and what is that newness? The second cause of interest is the mere appearance of the topic itself. Why, and how, is it possible that the recent surge of deliberations on the rule of law occurred at all, if, as is often believed, individual leaders have heavily dominated Chinese politics? In other words, what underlyingprocessesare at work to motivate the leaders to advocate the supremacy of the law, rather than the supremacy of their own authority?

1 January 2005 in Journal of Contemporary Asia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Linda Chelan LiLinda Chelan Li
Linda Chelan Li
(2005). Understanding institutional change: Fiscal management in Local China. Journal of Contemporary Asia: Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 87-108.