Lingqiao Kong

Dr. Lingqiao Kong

Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 September 2023 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLingqiao Kong
Lingqiao Kong
TWTong Wu
Tong Wu
YXYi Xiao
Yi Xiao
WXWeihua Xu
Weihua Xu
XZXiaobiao Zhang
Xiaobiao Zhang
ZOZhiyun Ouyang
Zhiyun Ouyang
Globally, rising food demand has caused widespread biodiversity and ecosystem services loss, prompting growing efforts in ecological protection and restoration. However, these efforts have been significantly undercut by further reclamation for cropland. Focusing on China, the world’s largest grain producer, we found that at the national level from 2000 to 2015, reclamation for cropland undermined gains in wildlife habitat and the ecosystem services of water retention, sandstorm prevention, carbon sequestration and soil retention by 113.8%, 63.4%, 52.5%, 29.0% and 10.2%, respectively. To achieve global sustainability goals, conflicts between inefficient reclamation for cropland and natural capital investment need to be alleviated.

18 March 2018 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLingqiao Kong
Lingqiao Kong
Hua ZhengHua Zheng
Hua Zheng
YXYi Xiao
Yi Xiao
ZOZhiyun Ouyang
Zhiyun Ouyang
CLCong Li
Cong Li
BHBinbin Huang
Binbin Huang
The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services are widely discussed and recognized. However, explicit information for understanding and managing the complex relationships of multiple ecosystem services at regional scales is still lacking, which often leads to the degradation of important ecosystem services due to one ecosystem service being enhanced over another. We assessed the biodiversity and the production of nine ESs (ecosystem services) across 779 counties in the Yangtze River Basin, the largest basin in China. Then, we mapped the distribution of ES for each county and used correlations and “partitioning around medoids” clustering analysis to assess the existence of ES bundles. We found five distinct types of bundles of ecosystem services spatially agglomerated in the landscape, which could be mainly explained by land use, slope and altitude gradients. Our results also show landscape-scale tradeoffs between provisioning and almost all regulating services (and biodiversity), and synergies among almost all regulating services (and biodiversity). Mapping ecosystem service bundles can identify areas in a landscape where ecosystem management has produced exceptionally desirable or undesirable sets of ecosystem services, and can also provide explicit, tailored information on landscape planning for ecosystem service conservation and the design of payment policies for ecosystem services within diverse landscapes at watershed scales.

26 July 2021 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LKLingqiao Kong
Lingqiao Kong
WXWeihua Xu
Weihua Xu
YXYi Xiao
Yi Xiao
SPStuart Pimm
Stuart Pimm
HSHao Shi
Hao Shi
ZOZhiyun Ouyang
Zhiyun Ouyang

1 August 2018 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TDTian Dong
Tian Dong
WXWeihua Xu
Weihua Xu
Hua ZhengHua Zheng
Hua Zheng
YXYang Xiao
Yang Xiao
LKLingqiao Kong
Lingqiao Kong
ZOZhiyun Ouyang
Zhiyun Ouyang
Worldwide, most ecosystem services have declined. However, the theoretical and analytical frameworks for the ecological risk assessment of ecosystem services are still lacking. Here a framework for the risk assessment of ecosystem services was developed based on the formation, changes, risk, and management of ecosystem services. The framework was tested in Ganzi, the upstream area of the Yangtze River Basin, for the regional ecological warning of ecosystem services. Ecosystem services in the form of soil retention and sandstorm prevention and ecological risks including soil and wind erosion were modelled. The results showed that with the increase in area and quality of natural vegetation (forest and grassland), the soil retention service and sandstorm prevention service increased by 66.92% and 8.59% between 2000 and 2015, respectively. Correspondingly, the ecological risk of soil erosion decreased by 8.8%, and wind erosion remained stable. Despite the negative impacts from agricultural development on sandstorm prevention, the increase in vegetation and improvement in ecological quality led to a decrease in the ecological risks of soil erosion and sandstorm erosion by improvement of ecosystem services. This research provides a new perspective for ecological risk assessment, as well as direct management information on ecological risks, by incorporating ecosystem services.

18 April 2024 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LYLingyan Yan
Lingyan Yan
LKLingqiao Kong
Lingqiao Kong
LWLijing Wang
Lijing Wang
LZLi Zhang
Li Zhang
JHJinming Hu
Jinming Hu
ZOZhiyun Ouyang
Zhiyun Ouyang

MCMin Cheng
Min Cheng
BHBinbin Huang
Binbin Huang
LKLingqiao Kong
Lingqiao Kong
ZOZhiyun Ouyang
Zhiyun Ouyang
Landscape change is an important aspect of coastal ecological conservation and has an essential influence on the sustainable development of the coastal economy. With remoting-sensing (RS) images between 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015, using geographic information system (GIS) technologies, we examined ecosystem spatial changes in the Bohai coastal zone. Results showed that wetlands, mainly constituted by reservoirs/ponds, were the dominant landscape types. The urban ecosystem has the largest area increment and the fastest growth rate from 2000 to 2015. The quantification of landscape metrics revealed that spatial patterns have changed significantly, and the change direction of these ecosystems had moved toward increased heterogeneity and fragmentation. In addition, natural and socio-economic data were used to analyze the major driving forces triggering ecosystem spatial changes through redundancy analysis (RDA). The results revealed that the output of aquatic products (AQ) and population (Pop) were the main factors related to wetland ecosystem change. Pop and gross domestic product per capita (GDPpc) were closely related to the urban ecosystem change. Annual mean temperature (ATm), crop acreage (CA), and grain yield (GY) had positive correlations with the agriculture ecosystem changes.