Importance: The efficacy of niraparib maintenance therapy with an individualized starting dose (ISD) warrants further investigation in a broad population with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (aOC), including patients without postoperative residual disease.Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of niraparib with an ISD in a broad population with newly diagnosed aOC (R0 resection permitted).Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study was conducted in China and enrolled 384 patients with newly diagnosed aOC who received primary or interval debulking surgery and responded to treatment with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. By data cutoff (September 30, 2021), median follow-up for progression-free survival (PFS) was 27.5 (IQR, 24.7-30.4) months.Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive niraparib or placebo with ISD (200 mg/d for those with a body weight of <77 kg and/or platelet count of <150 ×10³/μL [to convert to ×10⁹/μL, multiply by 1] at baseline; 300 mg/d otherwise) stratified by germline BRCA variant status, tumor homologous recombination deficiency status, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.Main Outcomes and Measurements: The primary end point was blinded, independent central review–assessed PFS in the intention-to-treat population.Results: A total of 384 patients were randomized (255 niraparib [66.4%]; median [range] age, 53 [32-77] years; 129 placebo [33.6%]; median [range] age, 54 [33-77] years), and 375 (247 niraparib [65.9%], 128 placebo [34.1%]) received treatment at a dose of 200 mg per day. Median PFS with niraparib vs placebo was 24.8 vs 8.3 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34-0.60; P < .001) in the intention-to-treat population; not reached vs 10.8 months (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.68) and 19.3 vs 8.3 months (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.34-0.67) in patients with and without germline BRCA variants, respectively; not reached vs 11.0 months (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.34-0.68) and 16.6 vs 5.5 months (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.75) in homologous recombination deficient and proficient patients, respectively; and 24.8 vs 8.3 months (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32-0.61) and 16.5 vs 8.3 months (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.72) in those with optimal and suboptimal debulking, respectively. Similar proportions of niraparib-treated and placebo-treated patients (6.7% vs 5.4%) discontinued treatment due to treatment-emergent adverse events.Conclusion and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that niraparib maintenance therapy prolonged PFS in patients with newly diagnosed aOC regardless of postoperative residual disease or biomarker status. The ISD was effective and safe in the first-line maintenance setting.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03709316

Background: Considerable evidence suggests that the heterogeneity of ovarian cancer (OC) is a major cause of treatment failure. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a powerful tool to analyse the heterogeneity of the tumour at the single-cell level, leading to a better understanding of cell function at the genetic and cellular levels. Methods: OC scRNA-seq data were extracted from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and the FindCluster () package used for cell cluster analysis. The GSVA package was used for single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) analysis to obtain a Hallmark gene set score and bulk RNA-seq data were used to analyse the key genes of OC-associated immune cell subsets. CIBERSORT was used to identify immune scores of cells and the “WGCNA” package for the weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA). KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) and GO (Gene Ontology) analyses of subtype groups were performed by GSEA. Then, univariate Cox and lasso regression were performed to further establish a signature. Finally, qPCR and immunohistochemistry staining were used to evaluate the expression of signature genes in OC. Results: Two scRNA-seq (GSE154600 and GES158937) datasets were integrated to obtain 20 cell clusters. T cells or NK cells (cluster 5, 6, 7, 11), B cells (cluster 16, 19, 20) and myeloid cells (cluster 4, 9, 10) were clustered according to immune cell markers. The ssGSEA revealed that M1- and M2-like myeloid cell-related genes were significantly upregulated in P3 and P4 patients in the GSE154600 data. Immune cell analysis in TCGA-OC showed that a high abundance of M1-like tumour-associated macrophages (TAMS) predicts better survival. WGCNA, univariate Cox and lasso Cox regression established a two-gene signature (RiskScore=-0.059*CXCL13-0.034*IL26). Next, the TCGA-test and TCGA-OC were used to test the risk prediction ability of the signature, showing a good effect in the datasets. Moreover, the qPCR and immunohistochemistry staining revealed that the expression of CXCL13 and IL26 was reduced in OC tissues. Conclusion: A two-gene signature prognostic stratification system (CXCL13 and IL26) was developed based on the heterogeneity of OC immune cells to accurately evaluate the prognostic risk.

Background: Metastasis is the main cause of mortality in cervical cancer (CC). Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been demonstrated to play a crucial role in carcinoma biology. However, the expression and function of circRNAs in cervical cancer metastasis are still unclear.Methods: In the present study, we identified a circRNA with an N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification, circCCDC134, whose expression was increased in CC tissues by circRNA-Seq and qPCR. CircCCDC134 upregulation in CC was fine-tuned by ALKBH5-mediated m6A modification, which enhanced its stability in a YTHDF2-dependent manner. The functional experiments illustrated that circCCDC134 enhanced tumour proliferation and metastasis in vitro and in vivo. For the comprehensive identification of RNA-binding proteins, circRNA pull-down and mass spectrometry (ChIRP-MS), chromatin immunoprecipitation-seq (Chip-seq), RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP) and luciferase reporter assays were used to perform mechanistic investigations.Results: The results revealed that circCCDC134 recruited p65 in the nucleus and acted as a miR-503-5p sponge to regulate the expression of MYB in the cytoplasm, ultimately stimulating HIF1A transcription and facilitating CC growth and metastasis. Conclusion: These findings indicate that circCCDC134 is an important therapeutic target and provide new regulatory model insights for exploring the carcinogenic mechanism of circCCDC134 in CC.

PURPOSE: This phase III trial aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of fuzuloparib (formerly fluzoparib) versus placebo as a maintenance treatment after response to second- or later-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with high-grade, platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer previously treated with at least two platinum-based regimens were assigned (2:1) to receive fuzuloparib (150 mg, twice daily) or matching placebo for 28-day cycles. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) in the overall population and PFS by BIRC in the subpopulation with germline BRCA 1/2 mutation. RESULTS: Between April 30, 2019, and January 10, 2020, 252 patients were randomly assigned to the fuzuloparib (n = 167) or placebo (n = 85). As of July 1, 2020, the median PFS per BIRC assessment in the overall population was significantly improved with fuzuloparib treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.36; one-sided P < .0001) compared with that with placebo. The HR derived from a prespecified subgroup analysis showed a consistent trend of benefit in patients with germline BRCA 1/2 mutations (HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.28) or in those without mutations (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.74). The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events reported in the fuzuloparib group were anemia (25.1%), decreased platelet count (16.8%), and decreased neutrophil count (12.6%). Only one patient (0.6%) discontinued fuzuloparib because of treatment-related toxicity (concurrent decreased white blood cell count and neutrophil count). CONCLUSION: Fuzuloparib as maintenance therapy achieved a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer versus placebo, regardless of germline BRCA 1/2 mutation, and showed a manageable safety profile.

Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most common gynecological cancers, with 313 959 newly diagnosed cases and 207 252 deaths in women worldwide predicted in 2020; of these, 17.6% of new cases and 18.1% of deaths occur in China.¹ Because of atypical early symptoms, more than 70% of patients receive a diagnosis at an advanced stage.² Currently, for patients with a new diagnosis, cytoreductive surgery combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (with or without bevacizumab) is the standard treatment. Almost all patients will experience relapse and eventually develop platinum resistance. In this setting, monotherapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), docetaxel, paclitaxel, or topotecan remains the predominant therapeutic option but results in a remarkably short survival, reflecting substantial unmet therapeutic needs.²

Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation has shown the potential in the detection and prognostic testing in multiple cancers. Herein, we thoroughly investigate the performance of cfDNA methylation in the detection and prognosis of ovarian cancer (OC). The OC-specific differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified by sequencing ovarian tissue samples from OC (n = 61), benign ovarian disease (BOD, n = 49) and healthy controls (HC, n = 37). Based on 1,272 DMRs, a cfDNA OC detection model (OC-D model) was trained and validated in plasma samples from patients of OC (n = 104), BOD (n = 56) and HC (n = 56) and a prognostic testing model (OC-P model) was developed in plasma samples in patients with high-grade serous OC (HG-SOC) in the training cohort and then tested the rationality of this model with International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) tissue methylation data. Mechanisms were investigated in the TCGA-OC cohort. In the validation cohort, the cfDNA OC-D model consisting of 18 DMRs achieved a sensitivity of 94.7% (95% CI: 85.4%‒98.9%) at a specificity of 88.7% (95% CI: 78.7%‒94.9%), which outperformed CA 125 (AUC: 0.967 vs 0.905, P = 0.03). Then the cfDNA OC-P model consisting of 15 DMRs was constructed and associated with a better prognosis of HG-SOC in multivariable Cox regression analysis (HR: 0.29, 95% CI, 0.11‒0.78, P = 0.01) in the training cohort, which was also observed in the ICGC cohort using tissue methylation (HR: 0.56, 95% CI, 0.32‒0.98, P = 0.04). Investigation into mechanisms revealed that the low-risk group had higher homologous recombination deficiency and immune cell infiltration (P < 0.05). Our study demonstrated the potential utility of cfDNA methylation in the detection and prognostic testing in OC. Future studies with a larger population are warranted. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.