The Covid‐19 pandemic has already affected many thousands of people and has become the greatest health challenge worldwide [1]. The range of clinical presentations varies from asymptomatic and mild clinical symptoms to acute respiratory‐distress syndrome (ARDS) and death. Due to the unknown number of asymptomatic viral‐shedding and pauci‐symptomatic people in the community, the total number of infections is uncertain. As yet, effective treatment is unavailable. However, the results of preliminary studies and clinical trials are improving our understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of Covid‐19. Herein, we share our personal opinions on the immunopathogenesis of this infection.

Significance Statement: This randomized trial demonstrates the safety and efficacy of conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)– to belatacept-based maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients 6–60 months post-transplant. Patients converted to belatacept showed sustained improvement in renal function associated with an acceptable safety profile consistent with prior experience and a smaller treatment difference in acute rejection postconversion compared with that observed in earlier studies in de novo renal allograft recipients. These results favor the use of belatacept as an alternative to continued long-term CNI-based maintenance immunosuppression, which is particularly relevant for CNI-intolerant patients, including those who experience nephrotoxicity. These data help inform clinical practice guidelines regarding the conversion of such patients to an alternative immunosuppressive drug regimen. Background: Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are standard of care after kidney transplantation, but they are associated with nephrotoxicity and reduced long-term graft survival. Belatacept, a selective T cell costimulation blocker, is approved for the prophylaxis of kidney transplant rejection. This phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of conversion from CNI-based to belatacept-based maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: Stable adult kidney transplant recipients 6–60 months post-transplantation under CNI-based immunosuppression were randomized (1:1) to switch to belatacept or continue treatment with their established CNI. The primary end point was the percentage of patients surviving with a functioning graft at 24 months. Results: Overall, 446 renal transplant recipients were randomized to belatacept conversion (n=223) or CNI continuation (n=223). The 24-month rates of survival with graft function were 98% and 97% in the belatacept and CNI groups, respectively (adjusted difference, 0.8; 95.1% CI, −2.1 to 3.7). In the belatacept conversion versus CNI continuation groups, 8% versus 4% of patients experienced biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), respectively, and 1% versus 7% developed de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs), respectively. The 24-month eGFR was higher with belatacept (55.5 versus 48.5 ml/min per 1.73 m² with CNI). Both groups had similar rates of serious adverse events, infections, and discontinuations, with no unexpected adverse events. One patient in the belatacept group had post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Conclusions: Switching stable renal transplant recipients from CNI-based to belatacept-based immunosuppression was associated with a similar rate of death or graft loss, improved renal function, and a numerically higher BPAR rate but a lower incidence of dnDSA. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: A Study in Maintenance Kidney Transplant Recipients Following Conversion to Nulojix® (Belatacept)-Based, NCT01820572

A new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation without the race variable has been recently proposed (CKD-EPI_AS). This equation has neither been validated outside USA nor compared with the new European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) and Lund-Malmö Revised (LMREV) equations, developed in European cohorts. Standardized creatinine and measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the European EKFC cohorts (n = 13 856 including 6031 individuals in the external validation cohort), from France (n = 4429, including 964 Black Europeans), from Brazil (n = 100) and from Africa (n = 508) were used to test the performances of the equations. A matched analysis between White Europeans and Black Africans or Black Europeans was performed. In White Europeans (n = 9496), both the EKFC and LMREV equations outperformed CKD-EPI_AS (bias of –0.6 and –3.2, respectively versus 5.0 mL/min/1.73 m², and accuracy within 30% of 86.9 and 87.4, respectively, versus 80.9%). In Black Europeans and Black Africans, the best performance was observed with the EKFC equation using a specific Q-value (= concentration of serum creatinine in healthy males and females). These results were confirmed in matched analyses, which showed that serum creatinine concentrations were different in White Europeans, Black Europeans and Black Africans for the same measured GFR, age, sex and body mass index. Creatinine differences were more relevant in males. In a European and African cohort, the performances of CKD-EPI_AS remain suboptimal. The EKFC equation, using usual or dedicated population-specific Q-values, presents the best performance in the whole age range in the European and African populations included in this study.

Background.: Tacrolimus trough concentrations (mean/variability), as well as concentration-to-dose ratio (C/D ratio), affect kidney allograft outcomes. We investigated the link between the C/D ratio and death-censored kidney graft survival (DCGS). Methods.: We performed a retrospective study on 1029 kidney transplant patients (2004–2016) with the following criteria: tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, >1-year graft survival, no initial use of everolimus, and available anti–human leukocyte antigen antibody data. We analyzed the impact of the time-varying C/D ratio on DCGS. Fast metabolizers were defined by a C/D ratio < 1.05. We also investigated the effect of an early (mo 3 to mo 6 post transplantation) C/D ratio below 1.05. Cox survival analyses were performed, adjusting for potential confounders (tacrolimus trough, variability of tacrolimus trough, de novo donor-specific antibody development, cytochrome P450 3A5 genotype, pregraft sensitization, mo 3 glomerular filtration rate). Results.: Time-varying C/D ratio was significantly associated with DCGS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.35; P < 0.001) in a univariate model, on the full analysis set comprising 1029 patients. In the multivariate time-varying model, based on 666 patients with available cytochrome P450 3A5 genotypes, the effect of the C/D ratio remained significant (HR, 2.26; P = 0.015); even when glomerular filtration rate at month 3 < 30 mL/min/1.73 m² (HR, 2.61; P = 0.011), de novo donor-specific antibody development (HR, 4.09; P < 0.001) and continued steroid prescription (HR=2.08, P = 0.014) were taken into account (other covariates, including tacrolimus trough concentrations, were nonsignificant). In the same multivariate model, the effect of early C/D ratio (median at mo 3 and mo 6) remained significantly associated with DCGS (HR, 2.25; P = 0.041). Conclusions.: C/D ratio is an independent and early predictor of DCGS. Identification of fast metabolizers could be a strategy to improve graft survival, for example, by optimizing tacrolimus formulation. Mechanistic studies to understand the C/D ratio effect are required.

Background: Immunosuppression after kidney transplantation is mainly guided via plasma tacrolimus trough level, which cannot sufficiently predict allograft rejection and infection. The plasma load of the non-pathogenic and highly prevalent torque teno virus (TTV) is associated with the immunosuppression of its host. Non-interventional studies suggest the use of TTV load to predict allograft rejection and infection. The primary objective of the current trial is to demonstrate the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of TTV-guided immunosuppression. Methods: For this purpose, a randomised, controlled, interventional, two-arm, non-inferiority, patient- and assessor-blinded, investigator-driven phase II trial was designed. A total of 260 stable, low-immunological-risk adult recipients of a kidney graft with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression and TTV infection after month 3 post-transplantation will be recruited in 13 academic centres in six European countries. Subjects will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio (allocation concealment) to receive tacrolimus either guided by TTV load or according to the local centre standard for 9 months. The primary composite endpoint includes the occurrence of infections, biopsy-proven allograft rejection, graft loss, or death. The main secondary endpoints include estimated glomerular filtration rate, graft rejection detected by protocol biopsy at month 12 post-transplantation (including molecular microscopy), development of de novo donor-specific antibodies, health-related quality of life, and drug adherence. In parallel, a comprehensive biobank will be established including plasma, serum, urine and whole blood. The date of the first enrolment was August 2022 and the planned end is April 2025. Discussion: The assessment of individual kidney transplant recipient immune function might enable clinicians to personalise immunosuppression, thereby reducing infection and rejection. Moreover, the trial might act as a proof of principle for TTV-guided immunosuppression and thus pave the way for broader clinical applications, including as guidance for immune modulators or disease-modifying agents. Trial registration: EU CT-Number: 2022-500024-30-00

Background: The prognosis for kidney survival is poor in patients presenting with circulating anti–glomerular basement membrane (GBM) antibodies and severe kidney injury. It is unknown if treatment with an endopeptidase that cleaves circulating and kidney bound IgG can alter the prognosis. Methods: An investigator-driven phase 2a one-arm study (EudraCT 2016–004082–39) was performed in 17 hospitals in five European countries. A single dose of 0.25 mg/kg of imlifidase was given to 15 adults with circulating anti-GBM antibodies and an eGFR <15 ml/min per 1.73m². All patients received standard treatment with cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids, but plasma exchange only if autoantibodies rebounded. The primary outcomes were safety and dialysis independency at 6 months. Results: At inclusion, ten patients were dialysis dependent and the other five had eGFR levels between 7 and 14 ml/min per 1.73m². The median age was 61 years (range 19–77), six were women, and six were also positive for anti–neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Then 6 hours after imlifidase infusion, all patients had anti-GBM antibodies levels below the reference range of a prespecified assay. At 6 months 67% (ten out of 15) were dialysis independent. This is significantly higher compared with 18% (nine out of 50) in a historical control cohort (P<0.001, Fisher's exact test). Eight serious adverse events (including one death) were reported, none assessed as probably or possibly related to the study drug. Conclusions: In this pilot study, the use of imlifidase was associated with a better outcome compared with earlier publications, without major safety issues, but the findings need to be confirmed in a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Trial registration number: EUDRACT 2016–004082–39 https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2007-001377-28/results