Martin Edwards

Dr. Martin Edwards

Newcastle University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2004 in Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NFNatalie Ferry
Natalie Ferry
Martin EdwardsMartin Edwards
Martin Edwards
JGJohn A Gatehouse
John A Gatehouse
AGA. M. R. Gatehouse
A. M. R. Gatehouse

1 January 2004 in Journal of Insect Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EFElaine Fitches
Elaine Fitches
Martin EdwardsMartin Edwards
Martin Edwards
CMChristopher Mee
Christopher Mee
EGEugene Grishin
Eugene Grishin
AGAngharad M.R. Gatehouse
Angharad M.R. Gatehouse
JGJohn A. Gatehouse
John A. Gatehouse

12 May 2011 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGA. M. R. Gatehouse
A. M. R. Gatehouse
NFNatalie Ferry
Natalie Ferry
Martin EdwardsMartin Edwards
Martin Edwards
HBH. A. Bell
H. A. Bell
With a projected population of 10 billion by 2050, an immediate priority for agriculture is to achieve increased crop yields in a sustainable and cost-effective way. The concept of using a transgenic approach was realized in the mid-1990s with the commercial introduction of genetically modified (GM) crops. By 2010, the global value of the seed alone was US $11.2 billion, with commercial biotech maize, soya bean grain and cotton valued at approximately US $150 billion. In recent years, it has become evident that insect-resistant crops expressing δ -endotoxin genes from Bacillus thuringiensis have made a significant beneficial impact on global agriculture, not least in terms of pest reduction and improved quality. However, because of the potential for pest populations to evolve resistance, and owing to lack of effective control of homopteran pests, alternative strategies are being developed. Some of these are based on Bacillus spp. or other insect pathogens, while others are based on the use of plant- and animal-derived genes. However, if such approaches are to play a useful role in crop protection, it is desirable that they do not have a negative impact on beneficial organisms at higher trophic levels thus affecting the functioning of the agro-ecosystem. This widely held concern over the ecological impacts of GM crops has led to the extensive examination of the potential effects of a range of transgene proteins on non-target and beneficial insects. The findings to date with respect to both commercial and experimental GM crops expressing anti-insect genes are discussed here, with particular emphasis on insect predators and parasitoids.

1 February 2006 in Transgenic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NFNatalie Ferry
Natalie Ferry
Martin EdwardsMartin Edwards
Martin Edwards
JGJ. Gatehouse
J. Gatehouse
TCTeresa Capell
Teresa Capell
PCP. Christou
P. Christou
AGA. M. R. Gatehouse
A. M. R. Gatehouse


22 July 2014 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ENErich Yukio Tempel Nakasu
Erich Yukio Tempel Nakasu
SWSally M. Williamson
Sally M. Williamson
Martin EdwardsMartin Edwards
Martin Edwards
EFElaine C. Fitches
Elaine C. Fitches
JGJohn A. Gatehouse
John A. Gatehouse
AGA. M. R. Gatehouse
A. M. R. Gatehouse
Evidence is accumulating that commonly used pesticides are linked to decline of pollinator populations; adverse effects of three neonicotinoids on bees have led to bans on their use across the European Union. Developing insecticides that pose negligible risks to beneficial organisms such as honeybees is desirable and timely. One strategy is to use recombinant fusion proteins containing neuroactive peptides/proteins linked to a ‘carrier’ protein that confers oral toxicity. Hv1a/GNA ( Galanthus nivalis agglutinin), containing an insect-specific spider venom calcium channel blocker (ω-hexatoxin-Hv1a) linked to snowdrop lectin (GNA) as a ‘carrier’, is an effective oral biopesticide towards various insect pests. Effects of Hv1a/GNA towards a non-target species, Apis mellifera , were assessed through a thorough early-tier risk assessment. Following feeding, honeybees internalized Hv1a/GNA, which reached the brain within 1 h after exposure. However, survival was only slightly affected by ingestion (LD 50 > 100 µg bee −1 ) or injection of fusion protein. Bees fed acute (100 µg bee −1 ) or chronic (0.35 mg ml −1 ) doses of Hv1a/GNA and trained in an olfactory learning task had similar rates of learning and memory to no-pesticide controls. Larvae were unaffected, being able to degrade Hv1a/GNA. These tests suggest that Hv1a/GNA is unlikely to cause detrimental effects on honeybees, indicating that atracotoxins targeting calcium channels are potential alternatives to conventional pesticides.